Earth Day

Showing posts with label economic justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economic justice. Show all posts

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Sermon for the Twelfth Sunday in Ordinary Time, June 21, 2015

B Proper 7 BFC 2015
1 Samuel 17:1-49
June 21, 2015

        In Greek, the root word for both “economy” and “ecology” is the word “house,” “home,” or “household.”[1]  Etymologically then, “economy” means the “managing of the household.”  Remember that as we go forward.  “Economy” is the managing of the household.
          Our Biblical creation myth is a derivative of a Mesopotamian myth written sometime earlier than the one we have in Genesis.  The parable of the lost tree of immortality is found in both the Mesopotamian myth and the Biblical myth teaching that humankind’s striving after immortality is a delusion.  In the Biblical story, that impossibility of immortality is replaced by the necessity of conscience.  In the end, that is all human has for its future:  conscience.  
You will forever hear me relate this factoid shared by Biblical scholar John Dominic Crossan.  Contrary to popular teaching, the word “sin” first appears in the Bible not with the story of Adam and Eve but with the story of their two children in Genesis, Chapter 4, humankind’s transition from a role as nomadic shepherd to settled gardener.  In a departure from the Mesopotamian story, the Biblical story is not decided peacefully.  Rather, the word “sin” is introduced and the advent of civilization begins, when Cain kills his brother Abel.  Cain then goes off to build a city and the violence increases exponentially.  God declares that whoever kills Cain will suffer sevenfold vengeance.  Lamech declares that he has killed a young man for wounding him, and whoever kills him will be avenged greater than one who would kill Cain, seventy-seven fold. 
Crossan therefore says, that escalatory, retributive violence is humankind’s original sin, laced within our primal myth as to how we build and keep civilization.  It comes with a warning:  “Sin is lurking at the door.  Its desire is for you; you must master it.”  Genesis, chapter 4, verse 9.  The teaching in the story says that this original sin is innate and unavoidable but a free choice.  It is not a matter of God sanctioning this violence which makes the violence escalate.  Rather, violence escalates due to human consequences.  All humankind has for its future is conscience.
What one tradition in the Bible teaches is, that human civilization does not necessarily need to be built by violence and violence is not necessarily woven into our human nature.[2]  As a Christian, Crossan believes Jesus looked deep into his tradition to counter the idea that retributive, escalatory violence is necessary.  Retributive, escalatory violence is necessary to protect me and my own, to get the jump on you who will harm me, to show my armor and weaponry superior to yours, there is a need to go bigger, to exact more damage so that civilization might be secured and peace might be achieved.  In contrast, Jesus taught:  we belong to each other.
Crossan outlines this whole argument in his most recent book, Is God Violent? How to Read the Christian Bible and Still be a Christian.  Against this normalcy of retributive, escalatory violence in human civilization meted out by those who believe they are doing justice, Crossan believes, is the Radicality of God found in distributive justice.  Two traditions, one Bible.  Which one will carry the day?
For example, the Radicality of God says, “The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants.” (Leviticus 25:23).  In contrast, the normalcy of violence through civilization building says, “All right, but I can still make loans with land as collateral.  That is not buying and selling but about loaning and foreclosing.”[3]  Hear the violence that happened to so many American families, our family included, in the recent debt and mortgage crisis.  Hear within that the idea that I outlined a couple weeks ago, “The king takes away as a spiritual practice that normalizes the violence of civilization.”
The normalcy of civilization’s violence over and against the Radicality of God is what is at issue in the David and Goliath story.  Shall Israel be shaped by normalizing the violence of civilization or shall it be shaped by the Radicality of God?  In a critique of the sin to go bigger, get the jump, and show my weaponry and armor superior to yours, David pushes aside the armor offered to him by King Saul and goes to meet Goliath in the valley between the two armies. 
And Goliath is the epitome of armed-to-the-teeth violence—a culture and civilization driven and operating by its value that violence and all of its trappings—triumphs.  Not only is Goliath an impressive physical specimen, we learn that the Philistines are far more technologically advanced than the Israelites.  The Philistines drive chariots, Goliath wears a helmet of bronze, armor of bronze upon his chest and legs, and holds a spear that is an impressive weight of iron.  Goliath walks out into what we have come to proverbially refer to as “No-Man’s Land”, the space between two warring armies.  Scripture literally refers to Goliath as “The Man In Between” or the one who walks into inhuman country.[4]  For, inevitably, as we normalize civilization with our violence, escalate that violence to maintain and keep civilization, this is who we become over the long haul.  We become inhuman. 
The very caution of this story begins way back at the beginning of Israel’s history with its own demand for a king.  The prophet Samuel tells the people of Israel that if they demand a king other than the Living God, it is the nature of kings to take, and take, and take.  In choosing the next king for Israel, the prophet Samuel goes to the sons of Jesse and relates that God does not look on the outward appearance, like other nations may, but upon the heart, the insides, the character, what drives a person from within.  David, as the youngest, is chosen with that very criteria.  It is a reminder that Israel’s king will rule not like all the other kings of other nations, but with the heart of God. 
So who are we?  David or Goliath?
As Rev. Dr. Samuel Wells has said, we are a nation of 300 million people, and we all have one thing in common.  We all like to think that we are the little guy.  We talk about standing up for the little guy.  And in the reading of this story, 99% of us identify with David and not Goliath.  We want the inspiring movie where the little guy wins out over the mighty giant.  But then we spend the rest of our lives amassing our armor to become more like Goliath.  It’s quaint that David, pushed aside Saul’s armor, but look at the degree, look at the job, look at the car, look at the house, look at the country!  We have stockpiled so many spears and helmets and breastplates and swords that we cannot even imagine life with a sling. And then we spend so much money on safety and security devices and procedures, that we can hardly move around in them. 
The story is a caution to human nature which likes its underdog stories but seems to act with the character of Goliath.  And it happens in the Biblical story.  David became Goliath.  David became a bully.  David raped Bathsheba.  David killed her husband.  David became a merciless military power broker.  David became a ruthless acquisitor of pleasure and advantage. David became the overblown beached whale he had begun his career by destroying.[5]  He did it all with a sense that God’s chosen have full license to do as they will, outside the character of God, because they are the ones who maintain civilization’s boundary between what it means to be human and inhuman.
Two weeks ago I also reminded us that we continue to be a country at war.   We order our household through the most escalatory violent means possible—war.  We live in a war economy.  And through two prolific incidents this past week, we were reminded how deeply rooted that economics of violence is in our country.   
With the killing of 9 people gathered for Bible study, including the pastor and State Senator, Clementa Pinckney, at historic Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina, we cannot keep pretending the room in our household is absent of racism.  Mother Emanuel AME is a church bubbling with God’s historic work in the liberation from the sin of slavery and the freedom of slaves. Charleston is a place where Denmark Vesey, in the 1820s, a class leader in Mother Emanuel, planned a slave revolt.  That revolt was discovered and Vesey and other leaders of the movement lynched.  From our faith tradition, how can we possibly not see these lynchings of African American folk as the equivalent of the crucifixion of Christ?  Why does that not register in our conscience? 
Pastor and State Senator Pinckney once shared that the military college of South Carolina, The Citadel, once trained its guns on the homes of members of Mother Emanuel Church in case there was another slave revolt.[6] 
We cannot keep pretending the room in our household is absent of racism.  Indeed, when the flag that flies over the capitol building in Charleston is the Confederate flag and the streets are named after Confederate generals, we can assume that the young white man got the message when his room is literally wallpapered with racism.  In the not so distant history, a little over two months ago, in North Charleston, South Carolina, not too far from the place where this recent terrorist attack on nine African-American church members took place, Walter Scott was shot several times in the back as he fled from police on foot, posing no immediate threat.[7]  Eric Liu, former White House speech writer and CNN editorialist wrote,

There is a sickness in our society, as Senator Rand Paul said, that is about violence and mental illness. But there is a deeper sickness -- race hatred -- which is "weaponized" by such easy access to guns. And underlying that is a deeper sickness still: the American penchant for avoiding the past and its meaning.[8]

What we continue to do is normalize the violence done against people of color in our country pretending that what we do is protect and hedge against the inhuman Goliaths who seek to bring down civilization.  The survivors of the young man’s massacre at Mother Emanuel A.M.E. said that he responded to pleas to stop by saying, “No, you've raped our women, and you are taking over the country . . . I have to do what I have to do."[9]  That is iconic racist rhetoric stated as a person who believes he has to get the jump, escalate violence, weaponize and arm his people, to protect against the coming barbarians.[10]  Did he read it in a book?  Was it taught to him by his parents?  Did he belong to a wider group that repeated that so much it was part of his bloodstream?  Or was it just that thick in the culture?
In the media, we protect that notion of civilization by stating that young white men are mentally ill and young black men are thugs.  We know who the real Goliaths are—the inhuman giants and beasts.  So we rob the common, deprive, lynch, circle the wagons, to protect the civilization we know out of fear that inhuman creatures will rob us of our “culture.”  We institutionalize our violence and point out any violence in response to our violence as barbaric. 
I listened as Fox News’ Sean Hannity tried to do his level best on Thursday to talk about the violence in Charleston, South Carolina, and somehow differentiate violence from racism.  It was an impossible task and he ducked and bobbed and wove around the points made by his guests because racism is in and of itself, not prejudice, but institutionalized violence.
Though our church has a beautiful, wonderful history to be told, we should also be honest, as people of faith who are forever being born anew, about how this area of the world was settled by many of our ancestors:  the bodies split open, the children ripped from their families and “civilized” in our schools and churches, and the land confiscated and ravaged.   Layer upon layer of our history has normalized violence against our Native American sisters and brothers and labelled it as bringing civilization in the form of severing almost every connection they might have to meaning.  And we belong to each other.
Canadian doctor Gabor Maté, a specialist in addiction, stress, and childhood development, has made an amazing discovery as to the causes of addiction.  It is not as liberals assume, a disease taking place in a chemically hijacked brain, or as conservatives assume, the result of too much hedonistic partying.  Rather, addiction is about the loss of connection.  Addicts have often led terribly difficult lives, in their early childhood, perhaps very lonely and sometimes brutally abused, many times highly stressed.  They develop a “hungry ghost” persona, always seeking to fill their empty bellies from something on the outside.[11]   So imagine what it would mean if whole communities of people were severed from connection and meaning, how addiction rates for a whole people would soar.  What is need, at the root are policies and programs that build community, create opportunities for early childhood development and well-being, and provide for early health.  Those forms of connection are the best antidotes against later addiction. 
But we seem to be addicted to severing connections to keep the barbarians at bay, a form of institutionalized violence, in this continuing economy of war, so that we might keep “civilization” as we know it. 
The other prolific incident was the release of the papal encyclical on climate change.  Again, remember that ecology comes from that same root word as economy, the ordering of the household.  And Pope Francis makes it clear that economic growth and technology will not save us from the coming devastation to our household.  Our armor will not protect us.  We order our household, create an economy, that runs against the wisdom of the household, our ecology.  Rather, our present policies amount to a war on not only the environment but a war on the poor of the world.  What does Pope Francis recommend, broadly? A turn from our individualism to a building of community to care for the diverse color of the coral reefs as well as a connection with the poorest of our sisters and brothers.  Ecologist Bill McKibben hopes this will be a return to a rethinking of what it means to be human.[12]  The very function of violence and war is to view our opponent as inhuman so that we might justify inhuman acts and behaviors.  We are at war with each other and at war with God’s creation to maintain “our civilization.”  We must turn from our addiction to this war economy.
Today we baptized Lucas Robert Page.  We baptized him with the earliest baptismal formula of the Christian Church:  “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female in Christ Jesus.”  No ethnic difference, political or social standing, gender identification shall keep us separate, apart, or unconnected from one another.  We promise to live into this reality on his behalf, to build community and connection, so that he might live in a world not dependent on a war economy.  We want him to know his full humanity among a Christian community that is coming into its full humanity.  We want him to know:  we belong to each other across ethnicity, social standing, or gender identity.  We belong to each other.
At the time of Paul, Jews and Greeks hated one another and took turns slaughtering each other during the social events within the Roman Empire.  Christians . . . Christians sought to imagine a different world, a world shaped by the economy, community, connection, and Radicality of God. 
Today we said we will engage with Lucas Robert Page to welcome the Radicality of God.  We will engage this war economy to welcome something wholly different.  We will engage and re-connect with the earth and our Native American and African American sisters and brothers to so that this institutionalized violence we call civilization might come to an end.  No more circling the wagons.
Indigenous activist, Audrey Siegl, standing up bravely with her ceremonial drum, the heartbeat of all creation, raised in protest to Shell’s monster oil rig, this week, said, “When we unite, become one and move with open minds and hearts, we are unstoppable. When we connect and stand as an indivisible and determined force for good, we can only succeed."[13] 
Today we baptized Lucas Robert Page.  May we live out that radical baptismal formula by engaging our African-American and Native American sisters and brothers anew, living out the creed of St. Francis’ Canticle of the Sun.  We belong to each other.  May we, as Billings First Church, both historically and prophetically, welcome Lucas into the Radicality, the economy, the household of God.   Amen. 



[1] oikos (oikos) is the Greek word.  For a more detailed discussion of how these words develop from Greek to English see Letty Russell’s book, Household of Freedom:  Authority in Feminist Theology  (Annie Kinkead Warfield Lectures, 1986).  See also, M. Douglas Meeks, God the Economist:  The Doctrine of God and Political Economy  (Minneapolis:  Fortress Press, 1989). 
[2] John Dominic Crossan, “The Character of the Covenantal God: Toward a Christian Theology of the Christian Bible,”  Transforming Christian Theology:  Shaping the Future of the Church, June 18, 2013, Lecture 1. 
[3] John Dominic Crossan, “Christianity’s Criterion:  Historical Jesus Christ or Biblical Jesus Christ,” Transforming Christian Theology:  Shaping the Future of the Church, June 20, 2013, Lecture 4.
[4] Everett Fox, Give Us a King!:  Samuel, Saul, and David (New York:  Schocken Books, 1999).
[5] Samuel Wells, “Five Smooth Stones,” Faith and Leadership:  Where Christian Leaders Reflect, Connect, and Learn.  http://www.faithandleadership.com/sermons/five-smooth-stones?page=0,0, May 14, 2010, Duke University Chapel, Duke University Baccalaureate. 

[6] “Massacre at South Carolina’s Emanuel AME an Attack on Historic Landmark of African-American Freedom,” Democracy Now!  June 19, 2015.  http://www.democracynow.org/2015/6/19/massacre_at_south_carolinas_emanuel_ame.

[7] Lawrence Brown, “This is American terrorism: White supremacy’s brutal, centuries-long campaign of violence,” Salon, June 19, 2015. http://www.salon.com/2015/06/19/this_is_american_terrorism_white_supremacys_brutal_centuries_long_campaign_of_violence/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow.

[8] Eric Liu, “Race Hatred Is a Deep Sickness in American Society,” CNN, June 18, 2015.  http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/18/opinions/liu-charleston-shooting/index.html

[9] Greg Botelho and Ed Payne, “Charleston church shooting: Suspect confesses, says he sought race war,” CNN http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/19/us/charleston-church-shooting-main/index.html

[10] James H. Cone relates what an iconic statement it is in his book, written four years ago, The Cross and the Lynching Tree (Maryknoll, NY:  Orbis Books, 2011)

[11] Johann Hari, “The Likely Cause of Addiction Has Been Discovered and It Is Not What You Think,” HuffPost Politics, January 20, 2015, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-real-cause-of-addicti_b_6506936.html.  See also “Dr. Gabor Maté on the Stress-Disease Connection, Addiction and the Destruction of American Childhood,” Democracy Now!  December 25, 2012.  http://www.democracynow.org/2012/12/25/dr_gabor_mat_on_the_stress


[12] Bill McKibben, “The Cry of the Earth,” The New York Review of Books, June 18, 2015.  http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2015/jun/18/pope-francis-encyclical-cry-of-earth/

Monday, April 6, 2015

Sermon for Easter Day!, Sunday, April 5, 2015

Easter Day B BFC 2015
Mark 16:1-8
April 5, 2015

            In the gospel of Mark, the Jesus movement begins in Galilee, one of the breadbaskets of the Roman Empire, an agricultural area.  Mark says that Jesus comes from Nazareth a satellite to the Jewish rebellion city of Sepphoris, Nazareth a rural peasant community four miles outside of Sepphoris.  Cities like Sepphoris and Emmaus had been reduced to rubble around the time of Jesus birth, Roman soldiers killing all the young men for miles around and raping all the young women.[1]
          Peasant peoples can endure much.  And they will often endure exploitation, avoiding direct confrontation, as long as they can maintain life at subsistence level. Peasants can maintain their honor as a village community and their ties with their kin farming and fishing on their own little plot.  Jewish peasants losing that little plot of land and their hold on the covenantal promise established in the land would have been in crisis in 1st Century Rome.[2]  Subsistence farmers and fisherfolk would have been pushed to the brink at this time as the wealthy chose to invest in land or loans, royalty taxing ever more to build and re-build cities, leveraging debt to squeeze the peasantry from land ownership to tenants (adding insult to injury by being a tenant on what might have formerly been their land).  And squeezing even harder to move tenants to day-laborers or even slaves.[3] 
          In looking for leadership, Jewish peasants would not have found solace in the religious leaders and authorities from Jerusalem.  Taxes to supplement the commercialism of the Jewish Temple and land grabs by the religious elites themselves would have left Jewish peasants in Galilee sour on the idea of finding leadership from well-placed, traditional religious leadership.[4]
In Galilee, breadbasket to the Roman Empire, Jesus begins his ministry teaching that the Empire of God is at hand.  With his opening line, using the word “Empire” and declaring that Empire for a God other than Rome or its Caesar, Jesus declares that his mission and program will be full of danger.  By using the word “Empire” to define God’s activity, Jesus and his followers are to be understood as counter to the already existing Empire, as anti-Empire.  The mission and program begin in Galilee with exorcisms, healings, communal meals, and teachings. 
As I shared in my first sermon about the gospels, the Gospel of Matthew defines Jesus as a “Righteous Teacher” following the tradition of Moses. Luke defines Jesus as “the Center of Time” between the Law and the Prophets and the age of the holy Spirit. And the Gospel of John defines Jesus as the divine “God” or “Son of God.”  Mark, believed to be the earliest written gospel, defined Jesus as an exorcist.  Jesus spends his time casting out the oppressive demons of Rome who possess the Galileean land and the Jewish people who live on that land.  While I was always perplexed as to why this good and peaceable Jesus might be crucified in the Christianity of my childhood and youth, the author of Mark makes it clear that Jesus knew such intentional opposition to Empire would lead to his execution.
The Easter story we have before us in Mark today has no resurrection appearance like Matthew, John, or Luke.  Almost all good study Bibles will let you know in their notes that the gospel of Mark originally ends with verse eight of chapter sixteen—the verse we have before us today.  The tomb is just……empty.  One interpretation of this Scripture verse ends abruptly with “talk about terrified” as if the ending to the gospel has yet to be written. The whole passage ends in a prepositional phrase, as if the gospel is not finished.  And maybe that’s the point.
The telling of this gospel story reminds me of the circular essays Ms. Bullock had us write in our high school sophomore creative writing class.  The gospel ends where it began.  The young man sitting on the stone tells the women to round up the disciples and go back to Galilee.  In other words, the mission and the program of Jesus now start over again.  Death, this political execution, does not stop the movement, does not end the story.  Begin again.  Exorcise oppression and domination, heal the sick and dying laid low by their poverty, share food with one another to preserve community, and teach and preach nonviolence to counter the violence and death you see all around you.  Jesus goes ahead of you and the activity of the Empire of God continues.  The message is that simple.  The message is that radical.
The author of Mark writes about the circular activity of God throughout the gospel.  John the Baptist preaches in the first chapter of Mark and is delivered up.  Jesus follows him in preaching the gospel and then talks about how he is to be delivered up in chapters nine and ten.  So it is, the author of Mark writes in chapter thirteen, that Christians are to take up preaching and will be delivered up.  When this act is culminated in the imminent future, the full drama will play out and Jesus will return.[5] 
Mark is written just before, during, or after the Romans are leveling the holy city of Jerusalem and the holy Temple.  In the year 70 C.E., Rome was starving Jerusalem and laying siege to the city.  The Romans were crucifying upwards near 500 Jews a day, ringing the city with their crosses, as a way of robbing the inhabitants of any hope that their God was at work to save them.  And we know that Jesus did not return during that time.  At least, in a way that would have saved faithful people from their torture, execution, and death.  Later gospel writers, like Luke, had to come to grips with this reality—wrote about the church going on in the age of the Holy Spirit.
Mark knows none of that.  The author of Mark defines faithfulness as our willingness to imitate the life, ministry, and mission found within the gospel.  Indeed, we must decide what that means when the tomb is merely empty, there are no angel chorus “alleluias”, and Jesus has not returned.  That is important, because to Mark, the earliest gospel written, resurrection only happens when we return to Galilee to start Jesus’ ministry all over again.
Biblical scholar N.T. Wright has argued, what else could plausibly explain “the rise of the early Christian faith as we know it” but the literal resurrection?[6]  Wright goes on to suggest that no other explanations but the literal resurrection are adequate, so that the literal resurrection remains the truth “however unlikely.”[7]
Talk about robbing the mission, ministry, and program of Jesus of its power.  I would suggest the rise of early Christian faith happened because Jewish peasants in Galilee became animated by a way of life that emboldened them to challenge assumptions in the Roman Empire by understanding themselves as the Children of God, cutting across the grain of their divisions to touch, heal, and share meals with one another, and finally, to teach an alternative lifestyle that not only allowed them to survive at subsistence but to thrive in community.  As Dr. Stephen J. Patterson wrote this past week, “Easter is not an historical fact that gives Jesus and all his followers the final victory.  It is a myth expressing the hope that Jesus’ death was not the end of Jesus’ vision, and the daring thought that the triumph of his reign of love and peace might still live out there somewhere in the near or distant future.”[8] 
I sometimes think we rob the gospel of its power when we say only the miracles matter.  What great power the author of Mark saw to be in the everyday struggle to confront, to heal, and to live in community.  We want resurrections, miracles, and second comings that do not depend our willingness to enter the struggle.  Mark’s world is a little too real, devoid of happy endings, to suggest that miracles save the story.
To confront the everyday violence and war preached by systems of domination is hard work.  To engage others and the world at the place where suffering and death occur is hard work.  To live in community with all the diverse personalities, cultures, and understandings is hard work.  But the good news of the gospel says that this hard work has the possibility to not only bring about life but to bring about life abundantly. 
To focus on the resurrection of Jesus as the be all, end all of Christian faith robs this radical Jewish movement and story of its power.  I believe the Gospel of Mark indeed says is that if the resurrection of Jesus is going to be real and possible, it will have to happen through the disciples who return to Galilee to live out the gospel again and again. 
For empty tombs and resurrection stories were a staple of Greek and Roman romance novels.[9]  In Jewish mythology, resurrections meant that a person was a righteous Jew or was a vindicated martyr.  The most widely known Son of God in the first century was Octavian Caesar, later taking the title, Augustus Caesar, “Augustus” meaning the one to be worshipped.  You may not be surprised to know then that the most widely known resurrections in the first century were Julius Caesar, uncle and adopted father of Octavian or Augustus, and Augustus himself, both their souls transported to the divine heavens, Julius through a comet and Augustus through flames.[10]   In a wider cultural context, resurrections meant that the program and mission of the deceased person continued.  Julius and Augustus, their program and mission of military might and economic domination, continued to live on as Rome ruled. 
So the question for any Christian community is whether the program and mission of Jesus continues to be rehearsed and replayed year by year, month by month, week by week, day by day.  Is Jesus resurrected through us?  Does the program and mission of Jesus continue to be rehearsed and replayed at Billings First Church?
Martyred Archbishop Oscar Romero understood this meaning when he said, “If they kill me, I will rise again in the El Salvadoran people.”  And to date, there is no question but that Romero has not only been resurrected in the El Salvadoran people’s non-violent struggle for justice but in non-violent justice movements throughout all of Latin America.  It is a meaning conveyed by Irish philosopher, Peter Rollins,

Without equivocation or hesitation I fully and completely admit that I deny the resurrection of Christ. This is something that anyone who knows me could tell you, and I am not afraid to say it publicly, no matter what some people may think. I deny the resurrection of Christ every time I do not serve at the feet of the oppressed, each day that I turn my back on the poor; I deny the resurrection of Christ when I close my ears to the cries of the downtrodden and lend my support to an unjust and corrupt system. However there are moments when I affirm that resurrection, few and far between as they are. I affirm it when I stand up for those who are forced to live on their knees, when I speak for those who have had their tongues torn out, when I cry for those who have no more tears left to shed.[11]

The Gospel of Mark knows this understanding of resurrection.  Nowhere, nowhere, is the more commonplace nature of resurrection in first century Rome made more evident than in the Gospel of Mark itself.  In Mark chapter 6, verse 16, King Herod is quaking in his boots because he believes John the Baptist who he had beheaded has been resurrected in this Jesus of Nazareth.  Herod fears that John has come back from the dead.  For those who preach the everyday violence and war of the domination system, authentic resurrection strikes fear into their hearts.   For those who have forgotten the earth given as a gift and the land as covenant promise, authentic resurrection threatens them with the creative and re-creative powers of God.  For those who spew hatred and venom in the name of their own private freedom, authentic resurrection seeks to transform their hearts.  For those who seek to limit God’s abundance to the wealthy few and cast out the hurting and the poor, John and Jesus are resurrected and the Herods of the world tremble.
And let the Herods of the world quake!  Alleluia!  God is at work in communities like ours to exorcise violence, share meals, tend to the sick, and seek righteousness and justice for those in sore need of it.   And today, this day, our whole world is in sore need of it.  Christ is not dead.  The words of Galilee resound.  Resurrection is happening.  Our world is in crisis and leaders are needed.
Today is a day when we say that God is still active, that the Jewish movement and story initiated by Jesus and his community begins again in Galilee, in Columbus as fires raged and in California where drought becomes the norm, in Crow Agency, Tanazania, and Chiapas where poverty and racism and ethnocentrism still hold sway, in Billings and Indiana where hate seeks to deny and discriminate against love, in Kenya, the Middle East, and in seemingly every American city where everyday violence and war gives exponential rise to more violence and war, in Sidney and in Texas where fracking threatens to despoil the land given in covenant promise.
So sisters and brothers, in the midst of the violence and war perpetrated by Rome on the peoples, hear the good news.  I say that the way back to God is possible.  Among those communities who do the hard work to confront the violence and war preached by systems of domination, Jesus is vindicated, and Christ is risen!  Among those communities who do the hard work to engage the world where suffering and death occur to bring about healing, Jesus is vindicated, and Christ is risen!  Among those communities who do the hard work of communal sharing and reaching across the great divide of ethnicity, race, class, and gender, Jesus is vindicated, and Christ is risen!
Jesus goes ahead of you and the activity of the Empire of God continues.  Not only in Galilee but just outside our door.  Today, this day, we proclaim that the resurrection of Christ happens because Billings First Church goes to school . . .in Galilee and once again re-lives the mission and ministry of Christ in our world. 
The world is in crisis.  And the resurrection only happens through people who are willing to lead as Christ led.  And I say today, through you, you beautiful, beloved, Children of God, Jesus is vindicated.  And Christ is risen!  Alleluia!  Amen. 




[1] In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus casts out the Roman legions from the Gerasene demoniac.  The ancient Jewish historian Josephus recounts that, in the year 60,  in response to Jewish revolt, the Roman legions took the town of Gerasa, the setting for Mark, Chapter 5, verses 1 through 20.  The Roman military swept in to Gerasa in the late 60s, killed a thousand young men, held their families captive, plundered their property, and set their homes on fire.  Found in Ched Myers, Binding the Strong Man:  A Political Reading of Mark’s Story of Jesus, (Maryknoll, New York:  Orbis Books, 1988), p. 191, quoting Josephus, War, IV, ix, 1.
[2] Werner Herzog, “Why Peasants Responded to Jesus,” A People’s History of Christianity:  Christian Origins (Minneapolis:  Fortress Press, 2005), pp. 51-52.
[3] John Dominic Crossan, The Historical Jesus:  The Life of a Mediterranean Jewish Peasant (San Francisco:  HarperSanFrancisco, 1991), p. 222.
[4] Herzog, “Why Peasants,” p. 51.
[5] Norman Perrin and Dennis C. Duling, The New Testament:  an Introduction (New York:  Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1998), p. 238.
[6] Richard N. Ostling, “Did Jesus really rise bodily from the grave?” The News-Gazette, Friday, April 14, 2006, C-8.
[7] Ibid.
[8] Dr. Stephen J. Patterson, “Three Myths of Easter,” http://www.stephenjpatterson.org/posts,   March 31, 2015.
[9] Robert Price, Deconstructing Jesus (Amherst, New York:  Prometheus, 2000), pp. 214-215.  Some examples, occuring in such stories as Chaereas and Callirhoe, Xenophon's Ephesian Tale, Leucippe and Clitophon, Daphnis and Chloe, Heliodorus' Ethiopian Story, The Story of Apollonius, King of Tyre, Iamblichus' Babylonian Story, and in places in Apuleius' The Golden Ass.
[10] Gary R. Habermas, “Resurrection Claims in Non-Christian Religions,” Religious Studies v25.n2 (June 1989): pp.167(9).  Cambridge University Press, citing,  Suetonius, The Twelve Caesars, translated by Robert Graves (Baltimore: Penguin Books, 1957), 1.88, II.100
[11] Peter Rollins, “My Confession:  I Deny the Resurrection,” January 1, 2009.  http://peterrollins.net/2009/01/my-confession-i-deny-the-resurrection/. 

Monday, November 10, 2014

Praying the News, Monday, November 10, 2014

Another Progressive Hypocrite

When I bristle against those who demonize the poor, am I just hedging my own bets?  I pray that I am not just another progressive hypocrite.  You know, I find things by which I can demonize others and remain self-satisfied.  For do I not demonize the poor with my actions?  What show of solidarity do I have to offer?  What way have I made my faith known with and through them?  Am I just talking a good game?  Convict me, Mother of Mercies.  May your real solidarity work through me so that I, too, can see your power manifest through them.  Then transform me.  Do not let sermons be empty platitudes or self-righteous judgments against others.  I know belief is
cheap.  Make my life real.  In the name of the Christ.  Amen.

Sermon, Year A, Christmas Eve, "Playing our part in the Christmas story resistance"

  A Christmas Eve Col/Paul 2025 Matthew 1-3 December 24, 2025              My Advent spiritual guides this year have been two writer...