Earth Day

Showing posts with label George Lakoff. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Lakoff. Show all posts

Friday, March 19, 2021

Sermon: B Christmas 2, January 3, 2021, "Breaking out of our blecchy vanilla frames"

 B Christmas 2 SJUCC 2021
Sirach 24:1-12
January 3, 2021

 

         In his book, Don’t Think of an Elephant, University of California at Berkley linguistic professor, George Lakoff, describes what happens when he begins his intro-level linguistics class with an exercise for his students.  He challenges his students to not think of an elephant.  Whatever you do, do not think of an elephant!

Lakoff knows, of course, with that frame, that students will immediately go to visual images of floppy ears and a large trunk, perhaps even a visual picture of Disney’s Dumbo.  Lakoff created a frame—an elephant.  The frame acts like a language box for the students’ thoughts and imaginations.  As Lakoff defines it, “Frames are mental structures that shape the way we see the world.”[1]  For example, once I say the phrase “tax relief”, taxes themselves become a negative, an onerous responsibility, not a way to support public schools, pay our public servants, or support infrastructure.  Using the word “relief” with taxes, reminds us that we need some respite from taxes.

Once a frame is created, Lakoff asserts, we basically create the parameters for thought, discourse, and imagination.  “Reframing is changing the way the public sees the world. It is changing what counts as common sense. Because language activates frames, new language is required for new frames. Thinking differently requires speaking differently.”[2]  

Framing is about using language that not only evokes your worldview and makes clear your values.  Framing and reframing can leave us entrenched in an old way of thinking and being; or, alternatively, help our heart follow our head into a new reality.

           So it is in our faith as well.  Once we create a frame for faith in prayer and devotion, we set about thinking of God and faith and life within that frame.  I might tell you to draw a visual picture of God.  Imagine God and, in so doing, imagine the gifts God wants to give to you.   And many of you, though you would resist and know it not to be true, would picture a grandfatherly-like figure in a white robe, and a long white beard.  These days, based on the frames we have been given, God might look more like Dumbledore or Gandalf.  Those images then dictate how we see ourselves, each other, and our world.  Though we might not agree with that worldview, because we employ a well-worn frame, this visual picture of God works on us.  The frame we draw in our picture or naming for God determines how the rest of our faith shall remain stalled in concrete or, alternatively, ever-flowering and ever-growing.

Gordon Hempton, who refers to himself as an audio ecologist, shares that he likes to challenge assumptions.  One of the major assumptions out there is that scientists, who have studied human hearing, have believed for a long time that our ears evolved to hear the human voice.  Intuitively, it sounds right.  Sounds natural.  Would not human ears be attuned to hear the timbre and meter of the human voice?  But if that were true, Hempton argues, we would be the only species on the planet that evolved so separate and apart from the rest of nature.  

           So Hempton investigated.  Is our ear specifically attuned to other human voices?  What he found is that human nature has a bandwidth of super-sensitive hearing.  Most of human speech falls well below that level.  There is a sound that is a perfect match for the bandwidth of super-sensitive human hearing.  What can we hear for miles and miles, ever so faintly?  Does anybody know?  Birdsong.  Birdsong is the perfect match.  “Birdsong,” Hempton said, “is the primary indicator of habitats prosperous to humans.”[3]  It is once again those kinds of truths that remind us that our God loves diversity and that, as humans, we live in an interdependent world.   To ignore God’s love and passion for diversity is to miss out on the beauty and joy that God intends for us, one of the primary ways we know our own safety and security.

           What Hempton found in his life’s work is that humankind was created and evolved to go outside its own melodies and rhythms to find a life that thrives and prospers.  What if God looks more like nature than like us?  What if beauty and joy and thriving are gifted to us outside frames we might have created?  Just waiting to be found?

           Wow, where did we miss out on all of that?  How did faith become so much about rules and regs and hanging onto  carved-in-concrete realities such that we wring all the beauty and joy out of faith? 

Whether we be conservative, middle of the road, or progressive, this time of year sometimes seems to be all about starting anew with resolutions that will make us more dour or stodgy or blechy vanilla than we were the previous year.  Blecchy vanilla, it is making its way into the English lexicon.  You just wait. 

 

We look with uncertainty
beyond the old choices for
clear-cut answers
to a softer, more permeable aliveness
which is every moment
at the brink of death;
for something new is being born in us
if we but let it.
We stand at a new doorway,
awaiting that which comes…
daring to be human creatures,
vulnerable to the beauty of existence.
Learning to love.[4]

 

           In that poem by Anne Hillman, hear the joy of not knowing, the risk of transformation, the call to love wildly, and the adventure of learning something new as a Christian pilgrim beginning a new year.  Rather than resolutions, these are the points of discernment to which God is calling us for a new year.  Spiritual teacher, Parker Palmer, reflects Hillman’s poem with these questions for a new year.  Ask yourself:

• How can I let go of my need for fixed answers in favor of aliveness?
• What is my next challenge in daring to be human?
• How can I open myself to the beauty of nature and human nature?
• Who or what do I need to learn to love next? And next? And next?
• What is the new creation that wants to be born in and through me?[5]

          

But here’s the thing.  We come here together in worship today because we say that God is involved.  And too often we think we can experience the joy of not knowing, the risk of transformation, the call to love wildly, and the adventure of learning something new without having our understanding and knowledge of God, the frame in which we have long placed God, reframed or radically changed.  How can we be more fully alive and spiritually growing and keep the understandings of God we have had since we were a small child?

 I remember being on a mission trip and looking in the night sky to see a moon so full and bright, like a moon I had never seen before.  In that moment, I knew that I needed a new image or frame for God that was different than one I had ever had before.  I became certain that God held me and was tracking me and I became aware of gifts that God was holding out to me that I could not possibly have known before.  And I am sure, just sure, that God smiled, She smiled, well-aware that I had grown.  From that point forward, I could never go back to the smaller god I had known before.

  As Roman Catholic sisters and teachers, Janet Schaffran and Pat Kozak state in their book, More Than Words, “An image of God held at the age of five that remains largely unchanged at the age of forty reveals very little about a God of infinite love and response.  It does, however, reveal something tragic about that individual’s lack of growth and inability to experience and reflect upon God’s action in his or her own life.”[6]

           Some time ago, Tracy shared with me a matrix she learned in seminary.  That matrix created an X and Y axis with the Trinitarian names for God (traditionally, “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit”) above the horizontal line and the corresponding names we call the world around us and we call ourselves in relation to God below the horizontal line.  Changes above the horizontal line required corresponding changes below the horizontal line.  For example, if God is Father then we are God’s children.  If God is loving Creator above the line, then below the line might be the “wonderful world” sung about by Louie Armstrong.  What we call and name God reflects upon what we call and name ourselves and our world.   In the same way, what we call and name ourselves and our world, corresponds with what we then call and name God.  If we are the diverse strands of community woven together, then God is the Holy Spirit who calls us together, the Divine Weaver, the One who in weft and warp makes of us one garment.

           In the work I have done as a spiritual director and teacher, one of the first things I ask people to do is to pick two images or metaphors of God.  The first image I ask people to select is a name for God they have used historically, the image or metaphor of God they learned in childhood, most probably an image of comfort and security.  The second image or metaphor I ask them to select is one of aspiration, an image or metaphor for God to which they feel God is leading them or calling them.  Not surprisingly, almost universally, the image of comfort and security people choose has been some version of “Father.”  The images of aspiration, the image or frame to which God is leading or calling us, on the other hand, in my experience, end up being very diverse.  

           So think on these things.  In this new year, to what image or metaphor of God are you being led or called?  For it may be that in knowing God differently and in diversity, we begin to discern the answer to Parker Palmer’s questions.  What image or metaphor of God would move you out of your comfortable life to one that is alive and what is that life?  (God as Walking Partner, Befriender of the Friendless, or God of Struggle) Out of that image or metaphor, how are you being challenged by God to be more fully human?  (Maybe a God who is Mystery, Daring One, or Breath of the Cosmos) What new beauty in humanity or the created world does the image or metaphor of God open you up to?  (Giver of Gifts, Keeper of Promises, or Flower of My Heart) With this new image or metaphor of God, what new people or place are you now called to love next?  (Immigrant God, Resilient and Homeless Youth) And then next?  (God of My Enemies, Sister to My Soul) And with this new image or metaphor of God, what is now being born in you?  How will you be transformed by it over the course of the year?  (Perhaps God acting as Midwife, Birth Mother, Risk Taker.)

           As Schaffran and Kozak relate, (quote) “[T]he development of positive, life-giving images is vital for adult faith.  This use of the imagination involves openness to being influenced by something or someone outside of ourselves in order to learn life’s meaning, depth, and possibilities.  We will be creating new images of God.  In the process, we are changed.  We grow.  We respond to a God who is revealed in a marvelous variety of ways.  Through these new images of God we find ourselves challenged to live, to love, and to act justly.”[7] (end quote)

           These names, frames, images, and metaphors for God orient us in the universe.  And, too often, what we do not realize, is that when we learn new details of the mystery and breadth of God, gifts we did not know were possible begin to emerge.  The world becomes bigger and brighter.  God’s love expands in ways we could not have thought possible.  We do not think of God as just an elephant.  We become aware that not only a human voice, but a bird’s song may be calling us to a place where we experience prosperous health and life we could not have otherwise imagined possible. 

           Today we read a Scripture passage that is one of the passages the author of the Gospel of John probably referenced to write the 1st Chapter of John.  In the beginning was the Word or Wisdom, and Wisdom, the Divine Architect, the One who seems to be both creature and divine at the beginning of all creation, is definitively female. 

More than any other issue that gets me in trouble in churches is when I use a metaphor or image for God that is profoundly female. 

In a previous church I served, I preached what I thought to be a liturgically beautiful sermon.  God was a Grandmother who left a light on in every section of the house, hoping we would come home.  When we did not, God, as Grandmother, put on her best winter coat and tightened her scarf to go out into the wind and snow to find us.  Someone in the church was so alarmed at this female image, that he campaigned for equal time when a more conservative voice might offer neglected male images to offset one Sunday when I used a female reference.  Every Sunday praying “Our Father.” Many Sundays hearing about Mike’s failed attempts at baseball excellence.  And he was alarmed by one Sunday when I referenced God as Grandmother.  Are we really that afraid of our own growth that we think God needs to be defended by circling the wagons and battening down the hatches of our souls?

           It would seem that one of the reasons we or others who have left the church might experience faith as “blecchy vanilla” much too often is that we consistently make choices for our own lives and our lives together that rhyme with comfort rather than risk.  Perhaps we are entangled in frames that are about what we learned and recited as creed with no thought given to growth, that do not open us to the many gifts and joys and energy God intends for us. 

           In the Scripture read, we learn that Wisdom came forth from the mouth of the Most High and covered the earth like a mist.  She was co-creating the earth and all of its foundations with God at the beginning of time.  What would it mean if we saw the activity of God not intervening in some miraculous events once in a grand while, but like a mist that pervaded all of creation, reflecting and refracting the goodness of God throughout—that the flower petal was a result of the tender finger of God outstretched to us in beauty, that the buffalo might be a sign and symbol God intended for our sustenance and well-being, that you, in all your diverse physical flaws might be known to God as beautiful and treasured . . . as you are? 

I had a colleague in seminary who would say with frequency, “If we knew God as a poor, pregnant refugee woman, we would indeed know why God loves so much.”  What might happen in our lives if we learned that God suffered and struggled in love such that the image or frame we called forward was tender and kind in mercy?  Because God knew what it was to need tenderness and kindness and mercy so desperately?

           What is that image of aspiration, that metaphor, that name for God to which you are being called or led?  Maybe it is not something you know for certain but something that allows you to unravel with life’s questions.  Perhaps it is like the great poet, Rainer Marie Rilke wrote in 1903, counseling a young friend:

I want to beg you, as much as I can, dear Sir, to be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and to try to love the questions themselves like locked rooms and like books that are written in a very foreign tongue.  Do not seek now seek the answers, which cannot be given you because you would not be able to live them.  And the point is, to live everything.  Live the questions now.  Perhaps you will then gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answer.[8] 

 

God is not an elephant and cannot solely be defined by the frame of Father.  We would do best, to live into the joy and the adventure and risk of a new year by listening for the almost imperceptible sound of a birdsong that might lead us to a new place where we might grow and prosper and live into life’s answers.  God has far more intended for us than we could imagine.  Ah, but we have to imagine outside the childhood frames and boxes that a living faith outgrows so that we might receive the new and extravagant gifts God intends for us. 

For the new year, I also had Lily, our new Office Administrator, send ahead a coloring page with New Year’s frames that you might decorate and beautify and answer these three questions: 

Question 1:  What name for God do I use that brings me a sense of comfort and peace to guide me throughout 2021?

 

Question 2:  What name for God do I use that will call me to growth and a deeper love in 2021?

 

Question 3:  What name for God will I use in 2021 that will move me to action?  

 

I invite you to post that coloring page, however you beautify it, with those answers in the frames, somewhere prominently in your home.  Maybe place it on your night stand near your bed?  Or you could use a magnet to attach it to your fridge?  Wherever you place it, make it a location that helps you to reflect on your relationship with God on a daily basis.  As you reflect, you will become more aware of God's presence bringing peace, calling you to growth, and move you to action.   As your pastor, my prayer is that these frames will help you to have a faith that is ever-flowering and ever-growing.  May it be so.  Amen. 



[1] George Lakoff, Don’t Think of an Elephant:  Know Your Values and Frame the Debate (White River Junction, Vermont:  Chelsea Publishing, 2004), p. xv.

[2] Ibid.

[3] “Interview with Gordon Hempton,” On Being with Krista Tippett, December 25, 2014.  http://onbeing.org/program/gordon-hempton-the-last-quiet-places-silence-and-the-presence-of-everything/transcript/7149#main_content. 

[4]Anne Hillman, “Life Prayer,” A Pilgrim’s Journey to the Great Better http://heartsteps.org/2014/life-prayer-2/.

[5] Parker Palmer, “Five Questions for Crossing the Threshhold,” On Being with Krista Tippett, December 31, 2014, http://onbeing.org/blog/five-questions-for-crossing-the-threshold/7167.

[6] Janet Schaffran and Pat Kozak, More Than Words:  Prayer and Ritual for Inclusive Communities  (Oak Park, IL:  Meyer Stone Books, 1986), p. 12.

[7] Ibid, p. 13.

[8] Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet, Worpswede, near Belgium, July 16, 1903.  http://www.carrothers.com/rilke4.htm

 

Monday, June 10, 2019

Seventh Sunday after Epiphany, February 24, 2019, "Unmasking a violent system"


C Epiphany 7 2019 BFC
Luke 6:27-38
February 24, 2019
         
          One of the great mythological questions asked in each age is, “What does it mean to be human?”  To even state the question that way is to somehow put all of creation under our feet and suggest that the rest of God’s creation is somehow less than, not as important, as a tool for our welfare and benefit.  I have found myself bristling when those well-intentioned about our Conference church camp, Camp Mimanagish, have asked, with all good intent, “How might we use Camp Mimanagish and be good stewards of this gift rather than seeing intrinsic value in the goodness of the pine and moose, water and rock?”  To ask, “How might we be in relationship with Camp Mimanagish?  What might we learn from it and what does the Boulder River sing to us?”  Those are significantly different questions.  One set of the questions says the camp is valued but disposable outside of human relationship.  The other questions suggest that this earth has intrinsic value outside of human reach. 
Returning to the question, “What does it mean to be human?”  We have historically disguised the question to suggest that some of us are more human than others in a hierarchy of being that some are not worthy, disposable, and some are of intrinsic value to God. 
George Lakoff, retired linguistic professor at UC-Berkley, regularly repeats the conservative moral hierarchy to help understand why there is such social, political, and economic polarization in this day and age.  People who are progressive in the social, political, and economic spheres cannot possibly understand conservative people unless they see this moral hierarchy at work.  Lakoff relates that hierarchy as follows:

• God above Man
• Man above Nature
• The Disciplined (Strong) above the Undisciplined (Weak)
• The Rich above the Poor
• Employers above Employees
• Adults above Children
• Western culture above other cultures
• America above other countries
• Men above Women
• Whites above Nonwhites
• Christians above non-Christians
• Straights above Gays[1]

This hierarchy suggests that all those beneath another are not as “human” or not as worthy as others so that if I should treat one as less-deserving down the hierarchical ladder, why would anyone object?  Either explicitly or just by repeating this as a cultural norm, is this not the personal, economic, and governmental history of our country?  I recognize that this moral hierarchy unfortunately moves through me and dictates some of the worst part of me.  As I watch the full force of the United States government, Democrat and Republican, begin the ramping up to affirm American exceptionalism, I recognize that we are not only seeking justification to invade another sovereign country, almost sure to happen now, but also affirming this moral hierarchy as not just conservative.
          The poisonous, evil Doctrine of Discovery which allowed Europeans to dispossess Native peoples of their land used this moral hierarchy.  It was Governor Harvey of Virginia who said that “savages” had no claim or right to the land any more than “wild beasts” in the forest.[2]  Governor Winthrop of the Massachusetts Colony invoked the very Bible passage I use to say that God has given the land to the community for its welfare and benefit.  Winthrop had an addendum.   He stated that the Natives of New England had not used the land as any European might so the land was available for the taking.[3]  With such an understanding, what is now known as southern and central Illinois, the birthplace of yours truly, was taken from the great Illinois people, because they weren’t really using it in the grand, ole European way.
          Who is human?  Who is worthy of the full rights and privileges of the personal or household, the business place or the courtroom, the government or equal?  If I take a nonviolent knee to protest police brutality or racism as a pro football player of color or as Ole Miss basketball players did yesterday[4], is that more human than an NFL owner breaking the law at least twice through solicitation of prostitution?  Which is more Patriot-ic?  Which is more human?
          At the time of Jesus, the moral hierarchy was even more stratified.  Jesus seeks to upend that hierarchy in teaching we have from the Gospel of Luke we have for today using a shared source that was also before the author of the Gospel of Matthew.  First, Jesus cuts through the idea that anyone’s moral hierarchy is better.  “See that enemy over there?” Jesus says.  “You know, the one you would like to move further down the ladder to place yourself over the top of?” 
          “Yeah?  Don’t they suck, Jesus?”  And Jesus says, “Love them.”
          “Whaaaaaaaaat, dude?”
          “Yeah, love them.  Do good by them.  Treat them justly, honorably, rightly.  Bless them.  Speak well of them.  Confer God’s blessing on them.  Praise them when you see them do right.  Pray for them.  Lift them up to God on their behalf.  Find common cause and solidarity with them.”[5] 
          “Duuuuuuude.” 
          “Yes,” Jesus teaches, “you are to show whole-hearted, unreserved, unconditional desire for the well-being of another.  And stop this transactional relationship thing that makes somebody beholden to you or to create people ‘owing’ you.  Give because people need it not to obligate or indebt.”
          “Duude.”
          “(shaking head), Yes.”
          Jesus does not allow our enemies to become another part of the moral hierarchy.  He does not allow violence to come to them because they somehow deserve it, are less than, or are not worthy of our respect, praise, or prayer.  And in upending the moral hierarchy, Jesus makes it clear to all in hearing distance that we are to be made and re-made in the image of a nonviolent, benevolent God.  
          But Jesus is not calling us to be a doormat.  Oh no.  In this teaching, expanded upon more in the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus uses three common scenes of disproportionate power in the ancient world:  the household with master and slave, the courtroom, with wealthy against indebted peasant, and the one not included in Luke, the Roman centurion and the Jew. 
          If I am facing you, as Master to slave, I will not hit you with the unclean hand, the left hand.  I will use my right hand to hit you on the right cheek.  We are not in a fight.  I am using the back of my hand to indicate you are not my equal, not human like I am.  It is a slap of insult.  If I use my open hand or my right fist to hit you on the left cheek, I would be indicating that I see you as my equal.  I insult you, tell everyone that you are “less than”, by backhanding you on the right cheek.  You now turn your left cheek to me.  You offer me an impossible dilemma.  If I strike you with my left hand, the left hand being unclean, I bring shame upon myself.  If I strike you with an open-handed right, I indicate you are my equal.  You are indicating that you are my equal, inviting me to treat you as such.  It is a sign of resistance to the moral hierarchy.  I, as the one seeking to make sure you know your place in the honor and shame code, am now caught in a moral quandary. 
          Similarly, we are now in the court room.  Peasants would not have used the courts to pursue justice.  This is someone who has means, showing his privilege, his ability to take the basic needs of a peasant.  The ancient world was a two-garment world—cloak or coat and shirt.  In your debt to me, after I have taken your crops, your land, your possessions, you now have nothing left but your garments.  and you are unable to pay.  I now insult you by taking your coat.  Shame is leveled on you as I enforce the moral hierarchy of rich over poor.  But a wry smile creases your face.  You know that in the ancient world, to see another person naked, brings shame not on the naked person but on the person seeing the nakedness.  I take your coat.  You now take off your shirt and my eyes grow wide as you give that to me as well.  The shame I intended for you, you now hand over to me in an unmasking of an evil and unjust system—I with one arm holding your coat and one arm holding your shirt.  Shame is brought upon me as I view your nakedness.  You are now no longer an object I dictate to.  You are a subject who has turned the tables on the moral hierarchy and unmasked the injustice of the court room.
          Finally, within the Roman Empire, centurions could impress conquered peoples to walk one mile with their heavy pack.  It is a way that the centurions can remind everyone who is in charge and whose schedule matters.  Roman civil law dictated that if centurions were to impress someone to walk more than one mile, a heavy penalty could be levied on them.  Imagine this.  As Jesus says it.  They now imagine a Jewish peasant walking that extra mile while the Roman centurion, trails them,  pleads with them to give the pack back, begging to get the pack back.  It is a way of saying that you will not rob me of my humanity.  You will not enforce a violent, moral hierarchy that robs me of what it means to be human.   It is saying that God sees me as quite different than you might see it.  And I will use all my humor, wisdom, resistance, and civil disobedience to say, “I am a beloved Child of God, not worthy of your abuse, your exploitation, or your occupation and persecution.  I am a beloved Child of God.  I am not a doormat. (beating chest)   I . . . am . . . a beloved . . . Child . . . of God!”
          Now we should remember.  We might be able to do this once or twice.  And then those who see themselves further up the moral hierarchy will figure out a response to reinforce the cultural norm.  That means we will have to be creative, engaged, and experimental to know how we will continue to unmask the violence of the system and remember our humanity.   
          Jesus has not asked us to employ violence to counter the violence of the system.  He has not asked us to be doormats.  He is teaching a third way.  What Jesus holds open is the possibility that the Master, the creditor, and the centurion might become transformed by our action and become just too.  Evil can be opposed without being mirrored.[6] 
          Sisters and brothers, siblings and cousins, it is time that we seek to put an end to these moral hierarchies through resistance to evil in creative, confrontational, nonviolent ways.  This is the third way of Jesus.  We must do that in a way that also sees the animals and trees as sisters and brothers but also our enemy who is not beneath us.  Rather, we must also say that we are not doormats to express the beauty, the courage, the divinity that moves in and around us, between us and underneath our feet.  God seeks to smudge us that we all might know ourselves as Beloved Children of God. 
How do we offer this creative, nonviolent confrontation to bring an NDO to Billings?  How do we offer this creative, nonviolent confrontation so that the scourge of violence against Native people comes to an end?  How do we creatively cut the purse strings to a pharma/soporific/addiction culture loosens its evil grip on our loved ones?  Let us begin the revolution of a nonviolent, creative third way, and tear down the walls of a moral hierarchy that are absolutely empty of meaning in God’s eyes.  Beloved children of God:  Love.  Turn the other cheek.  Give them your shirt.  Walk the extra mile.  Repeat.  Then creatively unmask and repeat again.  Amen. 


[1] George Lakoff, “The Conservative Moral Hierarchy,” July 1, 2017, https://georgelakoff.com/2017/07/01/two-questions-about-trump-and-republicans-that-stump-progressives/.
[2]Eric Kades, “History and Interpretation of the Great Case of Johnson v. M’Intosh,” Law and History Review, Spring 2001, p. 72.
[3] Ibid
[4] “Eight Ole Miss players kneel during anthem in response to Confederacy rally,” ESPN, February 23, 2019.  http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/26063456/eight-ole-miss-players-kneel-anthem-response-confederacy-rally.  You know, the place with a mascot of a southern plantation owner.
[5] David Ewart, “Year C, Epiphany 7, February 24, 2019, Luke 6:27-38,” Holy Textures. 
[6] Walter Wink, The Powers That Be:  Theology for a New Millennium (New York:  Doubleday, 1998), pp. 98-111.  Wink’s incredible description of this can be found here:  https://cpt.org/files/BN%20-%20Jesus%27%20Third%20Way.pdf.

Wednesday, May 16, 2018

Christmas Eve, "Sing her song"


Christmas Eve Narrative 4 BFC 2017
Luke 1:46-55
December 24, 2017

          What song are you singing tonight?  What lyric poetry gives definition to your life?  I know Sophia and I regularly ride to Sunday worship listening to Kelly Clarkson’s “Love So Soft” or Cake’s “Short Skirt, Long Jacket.”  We like to car jam and we’re quite embarrassing once we get rocking.  Or maybe the song you are singing tonight has a holiday flare, something that puts you in the mood, has you ready for tonight’s Christmas Eve or tomorrow’s Christmas Day.  Away in a manger?  Joy to the world?  O come, all ye faithful?  Darn hymnal writers.  Changing all the words. 
Tonight, before us, the first Scripture read, was the song of a young Jewish girl, Mary of Nazareth.  The song is one deep within the memory of the Jewish people, similar to the one the Jewish matriarch, Hannahm sang.[1] 
In a gloss of the Bible, prophets appear as future predictors.  We are told in some traditions of Christian faith that they arrive on the scene to tell us of the coming of the Messiah, the Second Coming, the rapture.  In a deeper read, however, prophets are truth-tellers.  They see an alternative reality, a deeper reality, and they know that if the present political and economic practices continue, practices that contradict the heart of God, the path to disaster is being made.   And these prophets have their ear to the ground.  These prophets know that slowly, surely, like an underground stream, like a soft heartbeat, God is carving, piecing together, finding an alternative way, sometimes with practices that seem nonsensical in the wider world.  These practices are fundamental to bringing about God’s hope, peace, justice, and joy for the flourishing of God’s good earth.  These prophets poetically, boldly, with developing clarity, call out the powers and principalities and their practices.[2] 
          Prophets often call out with poetic language or odd public displays and re-enactments because they know that the empire has bought off its wonks, its experts, to provide facts and statistics repeated, repeated, and repeated to reinforce the empire’s dominant, eternal status.   
          And in the Bible, the prophet is often marked by a liturgical call and response.  It begins with Moses.  God calls, tells Moses his vocation, and Moses responses, “Here am I.”
The angel Gabriel beams into Nazareth and shares with the young girl Mary the vocation to which God calls her. Mary responds with the classic faithful rejoinder of the prophet, “Here am I.”  Here am I.  Immediately, we know who Mary is.  She is a prophet.  She is a truth-teller.  In lyrical poetry, she sings and reveals to the world God’s heart.  Though we might reference Mary as “tender and mild”[3] in the Christmas hymn we sing with candlelight tonight, her song is a vision of radical reversal.  The arrogant and wealthy are torn down.  The lowly and poor are lifted up. 
As Gustavo Gutierrez wrote, “Any exegesis [or interpretation] is fruitless that attempts to tone down what Mary’s song tells us about preferential love of God for the lowly and the abused, and about the transformation of history that God’s loving will implies.”[4]
But I’m not sure we are ready for that.  I’m not sure we want to catch that rhythm and then sing that song.  One of the most difficult struggles people of progressive faith often have is “God.”  We do not know what to do with God.  We have reduced God to a romantic notion of a former time--when people were a little bit more open, hate was not as strong, and, “Oh, do you remember that time when we raised that whole ark of animals for the Heifer Project?”  We have no healthy fear of a God who may be working to change the world as it is.  Evangelical Christianity created an expectation for all of us that worship would be entertainment and have better production value.  Progressive Christianity made God for all of us into a romantic, superstitious notion with no healthy fear of what God might be doing to transform history on behalf of the poor.  We like the tune of Mary’s song, the Magnificat, but the words are problematic.  We dare not take the words seriously.  They are subversive.

        • When the evangelical Anglican missionary Henry Martyn went out to Calcutta as chaplain to the East India Company in 1805, he was appalled to discover that the British authorities had banned the recitation of the Magnificat at Evensong. On the final day of British rule in India in 1947, Mahatma Gandhi, who was not a Christian, requested that this song be read in all places where the British flag was being lowered.
        • After Chilean dictator General Augustine Pinochet came to power in a 1973 military coup, he banned the Magnificat as a public prayer.
        • The Magnificat’s prophetic speech was banned in the mid 1970s in Argentina after the Mothers of the Disappeared used it to call for nonviolent resistance to the military junta.
        • During the 1980s, the government of Guatemala found the ideas raised by Mary’s proclamation of God’s special concern for the poor to be so dangerous and revolutionary that the government banned any public recitation of Mary’s words.[5]

When rightly heard, the song of a young Jewish girl, Mary’s song, the Magnificat, is considered subversive and dangerous to those who take it seriously.  But you have to believe that God might just be at work to effect the transformation of history.  Otherwise, we’ll dress Mary in blue, place her next to Joseph in the nativity and have her reflecting and pondering in her heart. 
          I want to suggest something that might seem a little strange for what should be assumed in a place of faith like ours.  Tonight, I want you to take God seriously.  I want you to begin believing that you are not alone.  That is one of the great imperial lies in our time, as people praise a new tax reform proposal that will put money in their individual pockets.  It is the lie we are told over and over--that we are alone in this world.  We are not supposed to be piecing together the great Commonwealth or midwifing the great transformation to God’s empire where the economically poor are seen as the people of God’s own heart . . . God’s empire where people in recovery are not immoral but symptoms of a societal tear that is ruptured, a community wound that needs to be tended . . . God’s empire where the good earth is given to us as a shared inheritance and a reflection of God’s communal image . . . God’s empire where we belong to each other and are to see one another as keeper and neighbor.  In some Native American traditions, one of the harshest criticisms one can make about another is to say, ‘You behave as if you have no relatives.’”[6] In God’s empire, you know that relatives are everywhere.
          You behave as if you have no relatives, like you are self-made, in all of your arrogance and self-congratulatory patriotism, in all of your aggrandizement of war and militarism, as if the good earth were yours to exploit, use, and mine. 
          George Lakoff, linguistic professor and author, recently wrote out the conservative moral hierarchy, beginning with God above Humankind, Humankind above Nature, The Disciplined (Strong) above The Undisciplined (Weak), The Rich above the Poor, going on and on.  If there is anything that should be self-evident from Mary’s song, it is that Christmas is all about God overthrowing this moral hierarchy.  We are not alone.  Emmanuel.  God is not above us.  God is with us. 
          I know, for many of us, it is difficult to have hope in this winter of moral values.  But that is how it was for a young Jewish woman from a backwater town in the Roman Empire.  Remember as author Mary Hood said, that as far as the eye can see, “There’s no difference between a bare tree and a dead tree in the winter.”[7]  We are in a church season and perhaps a time in our world where we must pay attention to the light in the midst of the deep night and carefully stoke the embers of our communal souls, calling to ourselves sisters and brothers, siblings and cousins, those people who look nothing like our family, and caring for and tending the good earth even when the sap is not running.
          For those who have ears to hear, Mary is once again lifting up her song.  I pray it is the song you are singing tonight and will be singing in all future nights so that tyrants and tax reform artists will know that your soul is not up for sale.  I pray that the lyrical poetry of Mary’s song gives definition to all of our lives.  God is piecing together the universe with thimble and thread.  Your square is required to make a quilt of extravagant welcome and love for the new day that is seeking to be born on this evening.  I beg of you, on this evening, I want you to believe God is at work. 
Mary of Nazareth lifts her voice.  Sing her song.  Sing her song.  Amen. 


[1]This is a common practice among faith storytellers.  So that the present leader might have authority, the name of an ancient leader or their language is invoked.  The Qur’an tells the story of Mary invoking the story of the Muslim faith ancestor, Hagar:  Then [Mary] conceived him; and withdrew with him to a remote place. ‏And the throes of childbirth drove her to the trunk of a palm-tree. She said: Oh, would that I had died before this, and had been a thing quite forgotten! ‏So a voice came to her from beneath her: Grieve not, surely thy Lord has provided a stream beneath thee. ‏ And shake towards thee the trunk of the palm-tree, it will drop on thee fresh ripe dates. ‏So eat and drink and cool the eye.” —Qur'an 19:22-26
[2]“How God Intervenes:  Kenyatta Gilbert talks with Walter Brueggemann about the prophetic call in 2018,” Sojourners, January 2018.
[3]“The song of Mary is the oldest Advent hymn. It is at once the most passionate, the wildest, one might even say the most revolutionary Advent hymn ever sung. This is not the gentle, tender, dreamy Mary whom we sometimes see in paintings; this is the passionate, surrendered, proud, enthusiastic Mary who speaks out here. . . . This song . . . is a hard, strong, inexorable song about collapsing thrones and humbled lords of this world, about the power of God and the powerlessness of humankind.” —German theologian and pastor Dietrich Bonhoeffer
[4]Elizabeth Johnson, Truly Our Sister: A Theology of Mary in the Communion of Saints, (Continuum, New York, 2003), p. 269.
[5]Ken Sehested, “Signs of the Times,” Prayer & politiks, December 13, 2017.  http://www.prayerandpolitiks.org/signs-of-the-times/2017/12/13/news-views-notes-and-quotes.2968921 citing these sources:  Bonnie Jensen, “We Sing Mary’s Song,” World and World; John Dear, Mary of Nazareth, Prophet of Peace; Frederic and Mary Ann Brussat, “Birthday of Mary, the Mother of Jesus”; Craig Greenfield, “Here’s what you need to know about the REAL war on Christmas” ; Dietrich Bonhoeffer, quote from The Mystery of Holy Night, a compilation of Bonhoeffer’s sermons and writings on Christmas; Dan Clendenin, “The Subversive Song of the Mother of God: Mary's Magnificat,” in The Journey with Jesus: Notes to Myself
[6]Ken Sehested, “Silent Night:  An Advent Poem,” Prayer & politiks,http://www.prayerandpolitiks.org/other-poems/2017/12/04/silent-night.2955702.
[7]Ibid.

Sermon, Year A, Second Sunday of Advent, "We need a story that saves us"

A Advent 2 ColPaul AL 2025 Matthew 1:1-17 December 7, 2025           I wanted to offer a trigger warning this morning knowing that we...