Earth Day

Sunday, August 2, 2026

Sermon, Year A, Third Sunday of Advent, "Invitation to a Science Fiction Project" or "What are we willing to walk a long time for?"

 

A Advent 3 AL Col Paul 2025
Matthew 2:1-12
December 21, 2025

 Former Detroit author and activist, Adrienne Maree Brown, has written:

all organizing is science fiction.

we are creating a world we have never seen. we are whispering it to each other cuddled in the dark, and we are screaming it at people who are so scared of it that they dress themselves in war regalia to turn and face us.[1]

In effect, this is what the gospels are.  They are a form of science fiction mystery which call us to an imagining with God, an imagining of a different future--without violence and war, without hunger, poverty, and oppression.  We require imagination, a different way, for as the great Audre Lorde said, “the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.  They may allow us to temporarily beat him at his own game, but they will never enable us to bring about genuine change.”[2] 

The gospels knew this.   Though they used the language of the Roman Empire to critique the Roman Empire, the world the gospels imagined borrowed the language and vision, the science fiction of prophets who spoke from the time after the Exile.  The Exile was one of the nightmares in Jewish history when violence and warfare, oppression and dispossession were everyday realities. 

Remembering a Scripture verse I quoted from last week, God imagines a different future during that Exile.

The Living God shall judge between many peoples,
    and shall arbitrate between strong nations far away;
they shall beat their swords into plowshares,
    and their spears into pruning hooks;
nation shall not lift up sword against nation,
    neither shall they learn war any more;
4 but they shall all sit under their own vines and under their own fig trees,
    and no one shall make them afraid
;[3]

Those science fiction words imagine peace, shalom, and rest—something counter to their whole experience living in Exile 600 to 700 years before the birth of Christ.  The gospel writers believed they were now living in a similar time.  And  as Adrienne Maree Brown writes about such science fiction writing, “it’s neither utopian nor dystopian, it’s more like life.”[4]  

It is the science fiction imagined by those prophets who wrote after the Exile, envisioning a time when people might grow food that they might eat themselves, build homes they might inhabit themselves.  They imagined that science fiction when all that they could remember of the Exile was growing food for others to eat, building homes for others to inhabit.[5]   From these writers, like the prophet Isaiah and his tradition, the gospel writers borrowed heavily to imagine with God, to create their own science fiction. 

That science fiction is necessary because the world they live in is brutal, hard, and scary in the matrix of Roman occupation, oppression, and everyday violence.  Last week I spoke of Rome’s client-king, Herod the Great, who prided himself on being the King of the Jews.  How Herod was so brutal that he killed one of his sons he saw as a threat to his throne, leading the Romans to say, “Better to be Herod’s pig than his son.”

Our passage today begins with Herod.  Spiritual Director Erna Kim Hackett summarizes how the Biblical story reads us.  Again, sometimes we read the Bible so that we might discern meaning.  And sometimes the Bible reads us to discern who we are in the world:  She writes.

I found myself fixated on Herod this year.  I’ll let you figure out why I couldn’t stop thinking about an insecure leader who panders to empire and feigns interest in religion to try and secure his authority.  In the history books, Herod is remembered as a good leader.  He was prolific and visionary when it came to infrastructure.  He remodeled and expanded the Second Temple.  And he maintained a long-lasting relationship with the most powerful empire of his time and its most powerful leaders.  By many metrics, he could be viewed as a very successful leader.  But the Bible does not give a [bleep] about any of that.  If success under empire were the measure of success, Herod would stand at the center of the story as its hero.  Instead, he becomes its warning, a mirror showing what happens to a soul distorted by empire.  Herod reveals how power twists a person, how it turns faith into theater and people into pawns.  So much of America Christianity is desperate to succeed the way Herod succeeded:  political access, proximity to power.  It confuses elections with favor and wealth and blessing.  But Advent confronts us with a different truth.  Empire’s victories are not God’s victories.  The story opens with a tyrant on a throne and [Christ] in the arms of a refugee woman.  Only one of them is worth following.  God shows up on the margins, not in the halls of power.  Advent is an invitation to scrub off every way empire has wooed us, and to quit confusing Herod like ambition with Jesus’s way. [6]

 

The passage starts with Herod but the Scripture continues with the Magi playing their traditional role.  The Magi were the ones who read the way the Earth and Sky moved to tell us who were the true kings, the kings blessed by nature’s wisdom.  As a result, the Magi forever posed a threat to ruling powers.[7] 

We have regularly assumed three Magi made the journey because there are three gifts.  But the story does not tell us how many.  Imagine at least 12 Magi, in their traditional role, taking a little side trip to Jerusalem just to stick it in and twist it by innocently asking Herod, “Where will we find the King of the Jews?”  In the movie version of this scene, I imagine Herod, who believes King of the Jews is a title reserved exclusively for him, excusing himself and finding a private room where he punches his royal purple walls for about a half hour before he returns.

The question by the Magi is a form of Biblical humor, sarcasm aimed at the upper-crust and powerful.   In our modern world, it might be a number of radical Muslim clerics arriving in Washington, D.C., asking where they might find “the leader of the free world.”  Making it clear that they don’t think it’s the president, they move on to Haiti to follow the star they have seen.  

The story is told as a snub, a diss, to move from the seat of Rome’s client-king, the seat of local political and religious power in Jerusalem to a place on the margins. 

The Magi come from the East, the place of the Roman Empire’s mortal enemy, the Parthian Empire.  Imagine not only 12 magi arriving in Jerusalem but maybe 50 to 100 of them with all of their royal servants and accoutrements.  For the Biblical passage says that when the Magi tell Herod of the star they have seen Herod and all of Jerusalem are frightened.  The king-makers show up to say they are looking for the King of the Jews.  And, oh by the way, Herod, it isn’t you!  The Magi have been looking for portents, signs in the natural world, which would tell of the passing of an old order in favor of something new.  

As the seat of Roman-controlled Jewish power, everyone in Jerusalem knew that a star sighted by the Magi could only mean that change and transformation were about to occur, a new king was on the rise.  Three times in Matthew, Chapter 2, it says that these “king-makers” prostrate themselves before the infant child, a form of worship and reverence for a ruler or an emperor.  Not once did these same Magi do so for King Herod.[8]  They have made their choice.  The Magi proclaim who is the true king, the king for whom heaven and nature sing.

Long have Christian scholars misinterpreted what the Magi bring to symbolize gifts that reflect the life and death of Christ.  Rather, the gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh evoke the words of Psalm 72, the Psalm that was the basis for our responsive reading for today.  That Psalm is considered a coronation Psalm to be spoken as every Israelite ruler takes the throne. 

Psalm 72 says that the king shall practice social justice.  This value is affirmed as nations and kings from all over the known world shall make a pilgrimage to Zion to lay these gifts at the feet of the king.  This king shall be the champion for the economically poor and downtrodden.  The king who shall crush the oppressor.  The Magi bring these gifts to affirm Psalm 72, to affirm the true king’s primary value.

Three times in Chapter 2, Herod’s death is mentioned, as a way of suggesting that when God’s narrative and the narrative of imperial power come into conflict, imperial power is not ultimate.  The imperial system, a system exposed as ruthless and murderous, opposes the presence and power of God.  And at each turn the imperial system is thwarted in trying to kill the new king.  1) The Magi are uncooperative. 2)  Angels and dreams further the will of God and frustrate Herod’s plans..  3) Though the Holy Family must quickly leave for exile in Egypt, they do escape with their lives. 

All to say that the imperial system is not the ultimate.  Rome has its limits.  While Caesar claims the god, Jupiter’s presence, for Rome, throughout the Gospel of Matthew claims are made for Jesus’s presence among the community of the disciples.  Even after the Empire crucifies Jesus and he dies, his presence is still afoot for those weaving together the Empire of Heaven.[9]

The title of king is not taken lightly by the Romans.  Those who claimed the title without ordination by Rome were routinely executed.  The historian Josephus chronicles that others who took the title king did not fare well.  This is an ominous sign of what is in store for Jesus.  Simon was beheaded. Athronges was captured.  Menachem was killed.  And another Simon, who led one of the longest and most successful revolts against the empire, was executed in Rome’s capital city as a dramatic presentation of Rome’s superiority and intolerance for any challenges to its superiority.[10]

Jesus of Nazareth became a symbol of hope and resistance because of the very real and gritty ways of living he offered that helped Galileean communities to be sustainable and resilient at a time when they were fracturing.  Roman imperialism and its Caesar exerted everyday intense stress, pressure, poverty, and violence against their subject peoples. 

Jesus did not counsel people to engage this struggle righteously alone.  We sit in places like this church today because Jesus encouraged people to fortify one another by piecing together community, sharing food with one another, participating in mutual healing, darning back together fractured relationships destroyed by the economic violence, challenging the system which robbed those with those living with their backs against the wall.  And in the way Jesus practiced this movement, he had fun doing it.  I want to remind us again and again that they called Jesus a glutton and a drunkard.    

As I preached last week, these Bible stories are a threat to those who want to romanticize Christmas.  As a preacher and a pastor, I don’t know if I have ever been challenged to make Advent and Christmas more Biblically real.  Again and again, however, I have been challenged to practice the more imperial, sentimental Christmas with the right hymns, the right Christmas Eve words said at the right times, and to preach in a way that makes everyone feel all snug in their beds while visions of sugar plums dance in our heads. 

I hope.  I hope and pray for just a second, however, that like last week we might consider that the Biblical Advent and Christmas are needed in places throughout our world where people are imagining what God is imagining, entering into a science fiction project that speaks to our hearts of a new dawn, a new day where we might all experience the goodness of God.

Because again, for some in the world,  the pain is all too real.  And a sentimental and vanilla Christmas does not rhyme with their family’s tremendous debt, the fear of one more medical bill, violence some face in their everyday life as a spouse or child, people caught struggling with trauma and addiction, and the worry for some that they will be stopped without proper papers. 

 Or, now in our own country, what happens if Herod or Caesar come for my family and my children?  What am I to do?  Do we pack up our family and head for the safety of Egypt?  How do we make sure that the Holy Family escapes the mass slaughter of someone who calls himself the King of the Jews?

The Gospel of Matthew makes it clear that even Jesus’s arrival does not prevent the slaughter of children, poverty and disease, and deep, deep pain in the world.  What Jesus brings is the idea that God wants a decidedly different world, wants us to imagine it, to do our own project work in science fiction, and that God is inviting us in to be collaborators on the project. 

Spiritual guide, Matthew Fox, has written, “Sentimentalism is feelings without care for justice.  Nazi concentration camp hierarchy would torture prisoners during the day and return home at night and weep listening to Beethoven.”[11]

“The tamed piety of the conventional church wants an innocent baby who comes gently into our secure lives and keeps everything benign and friendly.  It may be conventional and it may be tame but it is not biblical and it is not Christian.”[12]   The Biblical story is all too messy and real.  That story is about both hope and hurt; pain and risk, as well as excitement and joy.  All were part of the adventure.

I want to invite us all over again to be Christ’s church, a symbol of hope and resistance over and against Herods and Caesars in each age.  How might we join with, be good allies with,  peoples that seeks liberation from the everyday warfare aimed at its people?  What would that look like to create a space where every person might be able to rest under a vine and fig tree--to offer refuge and sanctuary? 

 In this day, the Magi come looking for the people who walk the path of a new king, people who seek to be collaborators on the imagined project God has set before communities of sustainability and resilience.  Goodness knows Advent hope, peace, and joy begin when we ask what God might be imagining for the world and then begin to weave that together.  We begin where the prophet Isaiah and all the Gospel writers began—at a time when people have trouble even thinking it’s possible.  It’s not born yet.  We can only describe it along the edges.

Coloma/Watervliet or Bainbridge has/have never been the center of the universe, but neither were Bethlehem and Nazareth.  People of good courage, let us begin, with imagination and vision to walk the road to begin the science fiction project God has placed before us.  Like the Magi, what are we willing to walk a long time for?  

Last night and promised tonight the beauty of the Geminid meteor shower tells us that a new world awaits us.  The Herods and the Caesars of the world quake in their boots knowing they could not control or commodify it.  Let us scrub off every way the Domination system has tried to woo us to remember who we are as followers of the refugee child on the move from Bethlehem.  Let us be scrubbed clean to journey with Magi and to imagine with God.  Amen. 



[1]Adrienne Maree Brown, “afrofuturism and #blackspring (new school, #afroturismtns),” adrienne maree brown, May 2, 2015

[2] Audre Lorde, “The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House,” Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Ed. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press. 110-114. 2007

[3] Micah 4:3-4a

[4] Brown, “afrofuturism.”

[5] Isaiah 65:21

[6] Erna Kim Hackett, “Liberated Together” on Instagram, https://www.instagram.com/p/DR_Qssskdkj/?img_index=1.

[7] Warren Carter, Matthew and Empire:  Initial Explorations (Harrisburg, PA:  Trinity Press International, 2001), pp. 66-67.

[8]  Carter, Matthew and Empire, p. 66.

[9] Ibid, p. 67

[10] Ibid, p. 161.

[11] Matthew Fox, The Pope’s War:  Why Ratzinger’s Secret Crusade Has Imperiled the Church and How It Can Be Saved  (New York:  Sterling Ethos, 2011), p. 39.

[12] Ken Sehested quoting Kyle Childress, “Wiseguys and one scared king,” Prayer and politiks, January 1, 2012.  http://www.prayerandpolitiks.org/articles-essays-sermons/2019/01/04/wiseguys-and-one-scared-king.3418910.

Thursday, July 30, 2026

Sermon, Year A, Second Sunday of Advent, "We need a story that saves us"

A Advent 2 ColPaul AL 2025
Matthew 1:1-17
December 7, 2025

          I wanted to offer a trigger warning this morning knowing that we are going to talk about rape.  It is spoken about to neither glamorize or trivialize but to recognize it as the violence done to others.  Please be good to your own emotional and mental well-being as I share.  (Prayer)

In 1962, the son of a tribal chieftan, an attorney, member of the African National Congress and founder of the powerful Youth League within the African National Congress was arrested.  South African security police arrested Nelson Mandela for his opposition to the white government and its apartheid ("separateness") policies of racial, political, and economic discrimination against the nonwhite majority. In 1964, the government brought further charges including sabotage, high treason, and conspiracy to overthrow the government. At the opening of his defense in the 1964 trial, Mandela made a statement that would result in him receiving a sentence for 27 years.

He began that speech by speaking about the basis for his authority before the South African court.

In my youth in the Transkei I listened to the elders of my tribe telling stories of the old days. Amongst the tales they related to me were those of wars fought by our ancestors in defence [sic] of the fatherland. The names of Dingane and Bambata, Hintsa and Makana, Squngthi and Dalasile, Moshoeshoe and Sekhukhuni, were praised as the glory of the entire African nation. I hoped then that life might offer me the opportunity to serve my people and make my own humble contribution to their freedom struggle. This is what has motivated me in all that I have done in relation to the charges made against me in this case.

Later in that same speech, as he defined who he was and his political position, Mandela said,

 

I have always regarded myself, in the first place, as an African patriot. After all, I was born in Umtata, forty-six years ago. My guardian was my cousin, who was the acting paramount chief of Tembuland, and I am related both to the present paramount chief of Tembuland, Sabata Dalindyebo, and to Kaizer Matanzima, the Chief Minister of the Transkei.

 

We may think genealogies in the Bible the most boring and unimportant information found, other than the number of cubits God gave Noah to construct the ark. But in the ancient world, genealogies communicated important information. Much like Mandela defines himself through his family history, ancient genealogies were about a “claim to authority, to place, to political or civil rights, various social roles, or even the right to speak. Genealogies justified privilege, provided a written pedigree, and a long genealogy was a mark of honor. Genealogies were guides to social interaction” and where one ranked in the world. In keeping with a male-dominated society, genealogies like the one in Matthew were traced through Joseph and established a man’s social status in the world.  

But there is something odd going on in the Gospel of Matthew’s genealogy.

Much like you might know me as from the ancient clan of Mulberrys who were hallowed kings and prolific speakers, known for stirring speeches and calls to virtuous lives.  Revered and praised for his silver-tongued soliloquies and referenced as the first-ever Renaissance man, the Grand Duke of Dansbury, Pip Mulberry, was known as a teller of stories, baron of commerce, and a maker of a great souffle. Isn't that what we're all looking for when we put together those family genealogies?

Yeah, well, the real story is that James Mulberry was caught stealing a silken handkerchief, was brought before the English court, and told that he could either go to Turtle Island as an indentured servant or be hung for his crime. Luckily, my good man, ancestor James, may have been a criminal, but he was not stupid. The Mulberry clan settled in the lands of the Shawnee and Cherokee as indentured servants and moved north through lands of the Osage, Miami, and Peoria. I'm sure Mulberry royalty is somewhere back in the history.   If our family genealogist had only dug a little deeper . . .  Maybe.

One of the things Scripture teaches is that God does not see the world as we might see it.  Too often, we see things as they are and do not recognize what might happen if viewed through the eyes of God, when God arrives.  Isaiah 35 relates that transformation where wilderness and dry land bloom and blossom, the blind see, the deaf hear, the lame leap, and violent predators are nowhere to be found.  Salvation has come.  The land is now a safe place for community life and conduct.  It is almost as if joy cannot be known unless we know the flip side of suffering and struggle.  One has to know how vast and empty the wilderness is to know how bountiful it is when pools appear, springs of water show, and color and blossom break out.  God arrives in the messiness of the wasteland. 

By the same measure, today we have the genealogy of Jesus found in the Gospel of Matthew.  Matthew’s genealogy is different than Luke’s in some significant ways.  For example, Matthew includes four women in his genealogy.  And they are all women who are sexually suspect.  Tamar’s name appears two other times in Scripture.  She disguises herself as a prostitute to have sex with her father-in-law in Genesis.  In another incarnation, in I Samuel, Tamar is the daughter of David who is raped and abducted.  The second female name is Rahab who is a prostitute and a foreigner who helped Israelite spies.  The third female name is Ruth who was a foreigner from Moab and offered herself sexually to Boaz to protect herself and her Israelite mother-in-law, Naomi.    The fourth female name mentioned is the foreigner Bathsheba who was raped by King David only to have the child born as a result of that rape, die.  Finally, Mary of Nazareth is mentioned among all these women who are sexually suspect in a patriarchal world.  Almost all the women are not ethnically Jewish.  What is the author of Matthew trying to say about the unwed, pregnant Mary?  And why wasn’t she stoned for presumably breaking Jewish Law by having sex before marriage?  Maybe some historical background would help. 

Shortly before the birth of Jesus of Nazareth, Herod the Great, a much-disliked, paranoid territorial ruler, died. Herod the Great, known as the King of the Jews, was so paranoid he even had one of his sons executed for high treason. He was so ruthless that the Romans would say of him, “It is better to be Herod’s pig than Herod’s son.”  Herod’s the Great’s economic, political, and religious policies put a huge strain on Jewish peasant life.  For he was known as a city builder, and building opulent cities mined the resources of Jewish communities to export out and demanded higher taxes of the rural populace.  Herod the Great built these cities for the lifestyles of the rich and famous and named one of those cities after Caesar himself.  In today’s world, caring nothing for the remainder of the populace, we might say that Herod was “politically smart” and knew how to keep his head on his shoulders by serving these wealthy and elite interests.  When Herod the Great died, Jewish rebels and revolutionaries saw a power void and an opportunity.   Jewish rebellion, which had been simmering just below the surface, exploded upon Herod's death.

One of the leaders of that rebellion was Judas the Galileean, his father killed by Herod the Great.  One of the centers of that rebellion was the city of Sepphoris, four miles north of the rural, backwater town of Nazareth. 

Following Herod the Great’s death, Augustus Caesar divided the territory of Herod’s kingdom up among three other sons.  But the military forces of Herod's sons could not quell the Jewish rebellion. As a result, Rome took notice. The military commander Quinctillius Varus had been set up in Syria to provide a boundary to Rome's greatest military threat to the east—the Parthian Empire. You may know the Parthian Empire by the names of their independent, royal spiritual advisors—the Magi.

Just around the year of Christ’s birth, Commander Varus had up to 36,000 soldiers at his disposal and he moved in with all of his Roman legions and burned the cities of Sepphoris and Emmaus to the ground. Two thousand men were crucified. All other able-bodied men were enslaved and/or sent to the galleys where they were kept just barely alive, chained in the dark, living in their own filth, probably surviving less than a year. All of the girls and women in the Roman military path, particularly in defenseless rural communities like Nazareth, would have been raped.

Caesar Augustus appointed Herod the Great's son, Herod Antipas, to govern Galilee. In a display of patronage, and in keeping with the city building tradition of his father, Antipas rebuilt Sepphoris as a thoroughly Roman city with marble palaces, colonnaded streets, a theater, and Roman baths, such that Sepphoris became known in the Roman Empire as the “jewel of Galilee.” While the rural area around Sepphoris remained Jewish, Sepphoris was the city set upon a hill, four miles north of Nazareth, that reminded Galileean Jews of the opulence, oppression, and cruelty of the Roman Empire every day.

That is the context for Matthew’s genealogy.  Every day, the people of Nazareth could look four miles to the north, where they could see the city of Sepphoris and remember the Roman legions as they marched toward them.  Every day, they could look four miles north to see Sepphoris, the city set upon a hill, and know that the city was being re-done in Rome’s image.  The Nazareth farmers who were left, probably only older men, would never pose a threat to a Roman centurion.  Many of those farmers had lost their land due to leveraged debt.  The former farmers would make their way to Sepphoris and make a little money by re-building the city, a city where they had probably lost countless friends and relatives.  Tradespeople, like carpenters, were peasants who had lost their land.  And every day they would walk to Sepphoris to rebuild Sepphoris in Rome’s image.

Every day, Roman imperial presence was in the face of those Jews remaining in Sepphoris or coming to town to ply their trade from rural backwater towns like Nazareth, all who had survived the military massacre wrought by Quinctillius Varus. 

In this wilderness and wasteland, stands Mary of Nazareth.  The Virgin Birth may be important to many of you and your faith understanding.  If that is important, I don’t want to take that away from you.  But in the messiness of our own lives—the imperfection, sometimes the wilderness and wasteland, the places where trauma and pain and the impossible are held, God arrives.  God arrives.  And because we have known suffering, wilderness and wasteland, we might also know joy.  (long pause)

One of the projects I had the most fun doing in my almost 30 years of ordained ministry was using a Senior High Youth Group in central Illinois to retell the Christmas story through video camera.  Mary and Joseph are dating at Olivet Nazarene College in Kankakee, Illinois, when just around the holidays Mary confirms that she does indeed see a plus sign on the home pregnancy test.  Joseph is in disbelief.  Must have been some other guy but it wasn’t me.  Our Mary was great at giving Joseph “side-eye” when he delivered these lines.  Our angel was Mary’s sister, Beth, who convinces Joseph that he does need to go home with Mary for the holidays and face the music.

Mary and Joseph return home to Morton, Illinois, on school break, where they chatter with Mom and Dad about how school is going in stilted sentences, until . . . Mary blurts out, “Mom, Dad, I’m pregnant.”  A TV news director helped us splice together the minivan passing by, screeching to a halt, and then dad throwing luggage and Joseph and Mary out into a nearby cornfield.  Joseph and Mary try to get into one of the nearby hotels but an impending Barry Manilow concert makes it impossible.  Mary and Joseph ask the pastor of our church if they can use his garage.  We just happened to do it on the night of Church Council meeting so the last shot is Joseph and Mary and the babe and the Church Council behind them singing “Silent Night,” all done in the Senior Pastor’s garage.  The kids loved it, and they remarked that they had never thought through how scandalous and messy the Christmas story truly was. 

Some adults hated it.  And they let me know.  How dare I promote pre-marital sex!   I had rubbed the romance off the Christmas story.  But that’s the difference, right?  Many of us want a story that makes the holiday more bright and cheery.   And some of us need a story that saves our lives, that identifies with the pain and suffering, trauma and wasteland that is our lives.  Some of us need a story that reminds us that God arrives into the mess, however painful and scarred, wilderness and wasteland, fragile and vulnerable to create a space for us.  Where in the world does the story have to remain romantic so that transformation never happens?  And where does the story become real so that transformation is possible, because people have been waiting to hear that good news in painful, waste, and suspect places?

Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba, and Mary of Nazareth magnify the Living and Holy God with an understanding that their stories do not end when all seems lost.  As the author of Matthew observes, this is not one-time thing.  God keeps arriving.  In the midst of the suffering, pain, and trauma of your life, my prayer is that those wildernesses have opened your eyes for joy.  Because God keeps arriving.  God keeps arriving.  During this season, we desperately need a story that does not make things cheery and bright.  We need a story that saves us.  God keeps arriving.  Amen. 

Sources:  Richard L. Rohrbaugh and Bruce J. Malina, Social Science Commentary on the Gospels  Minneapolis, Fortress Press, 2002;  Article by Jona Lendering, http://www.livius.org/q/quinctilius/varus.htmlRev Dawn Hutchings, December 17, 2012  http://pastordawn.com/tag/advent-sermon-mary-of-nazareth-raped/www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/14647-varus-quintilius


Friday, July 24, 2026

Sermon, Year A, Second Sunday of Advent, "The Begats Matter"

 

A Advent 2 Pilg AL 2022

Matthew 1:1-17

December 4, 2022

(Trigger warning:  Within this sermon are allusions to sexual violence.)

           As I hope anybody who has been a part of our Bible 101 and Bible 201 classes can tell you, I don’t get really excited about providing answers when it comes to Bible study.  Certainty and answers are not what the Bible even tries to provide.  What really gets me going, has me super stoked, is when the class starts to realize that many of the questions they have long had, questions many people thought disqualified them from garnering meaning from the Bible, are the real and true questions needed to engage Biblical story, parable, and genealogy.  And that happened in both Bible 101 and Bible 201. 

           Wonderful questions, great questions by people in each class showed folks to be deep and courageous thinkers, willing to challenge the tradition they grew up to sometimes feel isolated our out of place in that tradition.  The two Bible studies described who we are as a United Church of Christ church.  We are a people of good questions rather than certainty and final answers—true of any healthy and deep and whole spirituality.

           In that vein, I would like to read the gospel passage for today, one rarely included in church services.  It is the genealogy of Jesus, according to the writer of Matthew.  I don’t know about you, but when I first began reading the Bible, all of those “begats” added to my boredom with the Bible.  Puhlllllease.  Why?  Why include all these begats? 

The ”begats” are important.  And this one is different and unique.  The Biblical text is usually male-dominated, patriarchal, particularly genealogies.  In other words, Biblical genealogies are exclusively male in tracing our ancestors.  Except this one.  Matthew’s genealogy includes some interesting females from the stories of faith. 

Begore we begin, I’ll need a good question from you to help me move through Matthew’s genealogy, as a way of imagining how that genealogy must have fallen on the ear of the reader or listener in ancient times.

           Six years ago, Dean James Ryan gave the address at the Harvard Graduate School of Education’s diploma ceremony.[1]  Ryan told the soon-to-be graduates that life had five essential questions.  The first one was, “Wait.  What?”  as in talking to his kids, the first thing they must hear from him is “Blah, blah, blah, blah,” and then he breaks into their consciousness with “and then clean your room.” 

“Wait.  What?” they respond.  This is a question of clarification to ensure understanding, a question to ask before making decisions or coming to conclusions.  The “wait” is a reminder that we need to slow down to make sure we truly understand.  Dean Ryan goes on to share that the final question is, to which hopes the graduates will all respond, “I did,” is, from a poem by Raven Carver called, “Late fragment.”[2]  In that poem, Carver asks, “Did you get what you wanted out of life, even so.”  Even so, is a wonderfully poetic phrase which reminds us that there will be tragedy, trauma, pain, and suffering in life.  Did you get what you wanted out of life, even so—even with the tragedy, trauma, and pain?  And the answer in the poem is, “I did.  I wanted to call myself beloved, to know myself as seen.”  I am able to say, “I did,” because I faithfully moved through life’s essential questions.

So I am going to read through the genealogy of Jesus responsively.  Responsively, because when I say one of the women included in the genealogy, you all are going to be great United Church of Christ people and ask that great clarification, “Wait, what?”  And then I will help with the clarification.  When you hear the females in the story of faith—Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, the wife of Uriah, Bathsheb—I would like you to respond with, “Wait, what?”

Ready?  Matthew, chapter 1, verses 1 through, well, we’ll go through about the first seven verses.

1 An account[of the genealogy of Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham.  Abraham was the father of Isaac, and Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers, and Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar,

Wait, what?

Tamar disguised herself as a prostitute and deceived Judah, her father-in-law, in order to have sex with him, become pregnant from that sex, and have a child from him. From this union, Perez was born

 

and Perez the father of Hezron, and Hezron the father of Aram, and Aram the father of Aminadab, and Aminadab the father of Nahshon, and Nahshon the father of Salmon, and Salmon the father of Boaz by Rahab,

Wait what?

Rahab wasn’t even a Jew or Israelite.  But was a foreign woman who was a prostitute living in Jericho who hid the messengers Joshua sent to spy in Jericho.

and Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth,

 

Wait what?

 

Ruth the Moabite was certainly not a Jew and  did something that must surely have felt “improper”: after Boaz had eaten and drunk… she came softly, uncovered his feet (a euphemism for genitalia in the Hebrew Bible) and lay down.  In other words, Ruth offered to have sex with Boaz to redeem her life and the life of her mother-in-law.

 

and Obed the father of Jesse, and Jesse the father of King David.  And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah, 

Wait what?

Well, the wife of Uriah was Bathsheba, who was married to a Hittite and raped by King David.  She lost this pregnancy but was later taken as David’s wife and gave birth to the child who would become King Solomon.[3] 

           I’m going to end it there, the final woman mentioned in the genealogy being Mary who gave birth to Jesus.  All of these women named by the writer of Matthew, sexually suspect in some way, all of them included in genealogies that are almost always exclusively male.  Could it be that Matthew includes these women to say something about Mary of Nazareth?

Just before the birth of Jesus, the city of Sepphoris was considered a Jewish city of rebellion, strongly anti-Roman, and within view of the rural community of Nazareth.  When King Herod the Great died, Jews saw an opportunity, and revolted.  Rome had had enough.  Quinctilius Varus marched with his legions from Antioch and burned Sepphoris to the ground, wiping the city off of the map and then turning to do that to the city of Emmaus.  Men of fighting age would have been slaughtered or enslaved.  Every implement of rebellion or revolt impounded, taken as treasure, or burned.  All of the women would have been raped.  This was the way the Roman Empire, the Roman legions would have maintained the peace, by crushing any hope of conquered peoples, to traumatize those already living in so much poverty, sickness, and death.

Wait.  What?  What do we think the writer of Matthew is trying to say to include these women in the genealogy of Jesus, to then also include Mary of Nazareth?

I share this genealogy so that all of us might be able to see ourselves in the Biblical story.  Too often we think the story of faith is about pretty, romantic stories that are for the “in crowd,” the ones who live charmed lives, the people who live lives without pain or blemish or suffering or death.  What I want us all to hear is that if our lives have been messy, maybe filled with trauma, or a life that has sometimes felt like everything has been against you, what these stories tell us, is that we can get what we want out of life, even so.  That even so, even when our lives might be marked by pain or torment, we can know that we are beloved by God, seen by God. 

Tamar, Rahab, Ruth, Bathsheba, and Mary of Nazareth were beloved by God, seen by God.  Into such a scandalous family tree, Jesus is born, to bring a different kind of peace.  So let us continue to be people of questions, remembering that though we may think our lives too scandalous for us to be known as beloved or seen by God, the scandalous has already been written into the story for us. 

Too often, during this time when we tell the Christmas story, we read these stories with so much romanticism and a lack of critical questioning that we wonder how we might be worthy of them—that there must be something we do to believe this season is written on behalf of the scandalous, the suspect, and those who are regularly seen as unworthy. 

Do not believe that anything we have done or that has been done to us has taken us outside God knowing us as beloved and seen.  For we are.  Wait, what?  Yes, that’s right.  Did you get what you wanted out of this life, even so?  We did.  For in this story, that tells us of the ancestors of Jesus, the family of faith, we know we are beloved.  And we are seen.  Amen.



[1] “Dean James Ryan’s 5 Essential Questions in Life,” Harvard Graduate School of Education, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bW0NguMGIbE&ab_channel=HarvardGraduateSchoolofEducation

[2] Raymond Carver, “Late fragment,” A New Path to the Waterfall, Atlantic Monthly Press, 1990.

Sermon, Year A, First Sunday of Advent, "We are the tellers of the tale"

Advent A1 ColPaul 2025

Isaiah 1:10-28; Matthew 3:1-12; Psalm 94

November 30, 2025

 

           In chapter 1 of the great prophet Isaiah, God entreats us, “Come now, let us argue it out,” says the Holy One, “though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be like snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall become like wool.  Come now, let us argue it out.”  Never has a singular passage made it so clear that what God wants . . . is relationship with us.  Isaiah, the prophet, believes that God has a case against the people, but enjoining the people, God wants to hear their side of the story.  “Tell me, so I understand,” God seems to be saying, “help me figure out how you could have gotten it so wrong.  Don’t hold back.  Don’t pull punches.  If you have something to say, make your case.”

           Some scholars believe that the first chapter of Isaiah is the prologue for all of the latter prophets, prophets like Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel, all who spoke from the Eighth Century B.C.E. forward.[1]  All of these prophets understood judgment and hope as the two sides of one coin.  This same understanding is part of the gospel text we have with John the Baptist preaching repentance to the people in the Jordan River.  Repentance is not about hell-fire and damnation.  Repentance is about purification leading to a different set of values, a different way of being in the world that shows we have chosen a different path. 

           There is no hope in the old path.  Reform is impossible.  A new way needs to be made.

           These prophets hear the same old, tired message from the people in protest, “But we are the chosen people.  We are the people of Judah and Jerusalem.  We are the people who regularly go to church and do our religious duty.  We are the ancestors of Abraham and Sarah.”  To the prophet, these are empty titles which do not recognize what God truly desires—to protect the weakest in their communities, the widows and the orphans, by doing justice.  And the prophet shrugs as if to say, “Stop being so defensive, so self-protective and join with me, join the collective pilgrimage, in creating the new way that transforms.”

You will hear it from me time and again because I believe it is worth repeating. There are several places in Scripture where God refuses the people’s worship because they continue to do injustice.  But nowhere in the Bible, absolutely nowhere, does God refuse the people’s justice because of the imperfect way they pray, or sing hymns, or do worship.  It is one of the most common themes throughout these Latter Prophets:  God refuses the people’s worship because of their unwillingness or inability to do justice. 

Isaiah clearly states in this passage that God will not accept the worship practices, religious observances or festivals, because of their violence and injustice.  Isaiah literally says, “Their hands are full of blood.”

John the Baptist, much like the Hebrews walking in the wilderness, does not depend on the Roman meal for his food.  He practices repentance.  He eats locusts and wild honey as a way of showing his independence from Rome and dependence on God.  John screams along Jordan’s shore, that the axe is being laid to the root of the tree, because the whole system is sick and diseased.  No good or real fruit can come from running the world in this way.  In this judgment, asking for people to show their repentance, this is our hope against hope.  We recognize that we cannot re-make the world without God and God will not re-make the world without us.

As we begin this Advent season, we remember early followers of Christ who believed God was acting to continue the story of salvation during a dreadful time in human history.  They created a narrative that ran counter to the violence and death and injustice and night they found all around them.  Dawn was breaking and they knew they were to pay attention to the breaking of that dawn.  They were practicing repentance.

One of my all-time favorite people to read for sermon preparation was Rev. Grant Gallup.  Rutgers University gave him a portal, a webspace, to express his incredible heart and wisdom.  He died way back in 2009 and then Rutgers slowly removed his web presence.  I miss his words so much.  Rev. Gallup was someone who was a gay Episcopalean priest who served the poor in Chicago, felt a loneliness and aimlessness there and so moved to Nicaragua.   Rev. Gallup said of early Christians:

Our believing ancestors thought of themselves as the subjects of their own history, for they were The Story and they were the tellers of the tale.  They were wide awake dreamers of wonderful dreams, in a world of nightmares, and they were awake to tell the dreams.  They brought light into a world of shadows.  They brought hope into a world that had lost its hope and lost its way.  They had been told by the God who visited them in Jesus that they were Light in the world.

 . . . God saves us not as a pinchpenny saves coins but as a mother saves her child from danger and delivers it to safety and health and maturity and responsibility . . . [2] 

 

I love that line.  “God saves us not as a pinchpenny saves coins, but as a mother saves her child from danger and delivers that child to safety and health and maturity and responsibility.”  God does not save us to continue the same violence and death and injustice and night.  God saves us to be the fruit of a different tree.  God saves us to be people who bring health and maturity and responsibility to our community and our world.  We are to be the actors not the acted upon, the subjects of salvation not the objects done-in by the violence, death, injustice, and night that surrounds us.  We cannot save the world without God, and God will not save the world without us.

           (start soft and pick up anger as you go) Too often, in the church, we have acted too courteously when God has asked us to be lovingly confrontational, too polite when God has asked us to protest in truth, too respectable when God has asked us to be resolute in seeking out justice for the most vulnerable among us.  “Come, let us argue it out!” God says, the Holy God who desires not platitudes or a fake politeness, but a real relationship with us.

           The late Rev. Dr. Peter Gomes, at one time the Plummer Professor of Christian Morals and Pusey Minister in The Memorial Church at Harvard University, spoke at the United Church of Christ General Synod for our 50th Anniversary, in Hartford, Connecticut almost 20 years ago.  Speaking as an American Baptist in the mist of New England Congregational heritage, (a heritage that is part of First Congregational United Church of Christ in Coloma), Rev. Dr. Gomes showed his appreciation for the United Church of Christ, saying that we have led out on every important social movement in this republic.  But, he said, one of the greatest things we could do in our own time is “to overturn the climate of low expectations” in mainline churches.  People in communities like Coloma/Bainbridge and Watervliet have very respectable expectations of local UCC churches, and it is our job to turn these respectable expectations upside down. 

           He went on.  We give the occasional heifer (referring to the Heifer Project), have the funeral for the respectable person, every once in while marry the person not so respected.  “Here is a chance,” Gomes said with a smile, “for a great church to behave badly.”

           As the late Congressperson John Lewis said, and I’m sure many of us can quote it, after his sit-in on the Congressional floor to protest the lack of collegial courage around gun violence, “Sometimes you have to find a way to get in the way.  Or get in trouble.  Good trouble.  Necessary trouble.”[3]

           What do we think of that wild-eyed prophet calling for repentance out by the Jordan River, eating bugs and wild honey for lunch?  Do we think he cared more about individual respectability or the world’s salvation?

           Is it possible in a United Church of Christ Church, that our best days are ahead of us?  Many mainline churches have a habit of acting like their heydays are all in the past.  As in, “Oh, you should have been here back then.”

           Gomes ended his speech by wondering aloud whether all the history of the United Church of Christ was leading up till now, a time for us to act with conviction and character . . . with a hope that God is still acting and speaking.  What Rev. Dr. Gomes wanted to know is, “Are we still listening?”

           “Dare it be said,” he challenged, “dare it be said, that the last 50 years (back then the whole of our life as a denomination), the last 50 years were mere prologue for what is to happen, for whatever role you were meant to play?  Dare it be said that your founders simply began what it falls to you to carry on and complete?”[4]

           Dare it be said that all of those people who began the First Congregational United Church of Christ of Coloma/St. Paul’s United Church of Christ, that they simply began this incredible project that now falls on us to carry on and complete?  As we look at the violence, injustice, night, and death that surround us in this time, a time not unlike the time of Christ, we may be the Light of the world, the subjects of our own history.  So here we are, sisters and brothers, siblings and cousins, members and friends of the First Congregational United Church of Christ of Coloma/St. Paul’s United Church of Christ.  Here we are.  This is our story and we are the tellers of the tale.  Amen.



[1] J Clinton McCann, “Commentary on First Alternate Reading—Lectionary for August 8, 2010”  WorkingPreacker.org, http://www.workingpreacher.org/preaching.aspx?lect_date=8/8/2010 .

[2] Grant Gallup, “First Sunday of Advent A,” Homily Grits, http://rci.rutgers.edu/~lcrew/homilygrits04_05/msg00020.html.

[3] “Interview with Congressperson John Lewis,” The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, September 1, 2016.

[4] Rev. Dr. Peter Gomes, Synod in the City, United Church of Christ General Synod, Hartford, CT, June 26, 2007.

Sermon, Year A, Third Sunday of Advent, "Invitation to a Science Fiction Project" or "What are we willing to walk a long time for?"

  A Advent 3 AL Col Paul 2025 Matthew 2:1-12 December 21, 2025   Former Detroit author and activist, Adrienne Maree Brown, has written: ...