Earth Day

Showing posts with label Dr. Ibram X. Kendi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dr. Ibram X. Kendi. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 23, 2021

Sermon: B Lent 3/Amistad Sunday, March 7, 2021, How long? Not long!

 B Lent 3 UCB 2012
Psalm 107 (OL for Amistad Sunday/BLent4 Scripture)
March 7, 2021 

              When I was in seminary, I regularly lampooned and directed sarcasm at the Bible, suggested that its moral authority meant little to me as a Christian.  I found very little eternal meaning in its pages.

           In the dreaded Middler Orals at Eden Theological Seminary, the seminary student is brought before a panel of three faculty members and quizzed and questioned on every theological issue under the sun.  One of the professors on my panel knew of my disdain for Scripture and sought to bring that forward for the other two faculty members to see.  By that time in seminary, I had decided I was not going to die in a ditch created for me by someone else.  At the time, my seminary was at war with itself, and too often seminary professors took out the differences of opinion they had with each other out on the students.   

           And I was changing in seminary.  I had one of the most gifted New Testament professors, the foremost Gospel of Thomas scholar in the world, who taught us the basics, encouraged critical insight, did not allow us to be lazy with politically opportune translations, and someone who sparkled when we investigated the text.  Like Steve, I began to delight in the work required to do Biblical investigation and find its meaning.  But during Middler Orals, I certainly was not going to display the transition I was going through, believing that would have conveyed theological weakness to at least one of my professors who wanted my Biblical certainty. 

           And Steve, my New Testament Professor, helped me even further when I would call him about a particular text for a sermon—usually late on a Saturday night!  Here I was, calling my New Testament professor out of the blue, and he was taking the time with me to look at the Scripture.  It was like going through a mini-class of Biblical CSI.  I would hear Steve working through his analysis over the phone, looking at the Scripture through four different angles, and delighting in a new perspective or understanding he had found right in that moment.   This was usually followed by me saying, “How am I supposed to preach THAT?”  And Steve would respond, with a smile in his voice, “Mike, my friend, that’s why they pay you the big money!”

           I retained my critical eye for Scripture, but I began to see real life truths that emerged from ancient stories and mythologies.  I began to see Biblical authors working the tradition—passing it on, repeating it to remind people that the story could be heard echoing into a new time, reshaping it and reformulating it for their day.  I saw a deep tradition beginning to reveal itself to me. 

One of those deep, deep stories had to do with the prophets, the truth tellers to power.  Something courageous within the heart of prophets placed them as intermediaries between God and the people. 

The prophets experienced the pain and suffering of God in a very real way.   I think I too often forget to relate that to you as a congregation, but relating the heart of God is done so well by the Biblical prophets.  God’s heart is full of revelry and joy when people live in right relationship with one another.  The prophets relate that God delights in us.  Like a small child, God is gleefully clapping hands, making music, and singing along.  At the same time, when God witnesses us taking advantage of the most vulnerable, the prophets share that God moans and grieves, openly weeping.  God’s heart is broken.  Almost like a young lover who sees her sweetheart in the arms of another, God feels jilted and scorned by such behavior.   So the prophet is given the job of relating God’s busting-at-the-seams joy with the people.  Or God’s disappointment, sorrow, and anger to challenge people in power—to communicate God’s joy or pain.

But the prophet also, as intermediary, must relate the pain of the people to God.  The people wonder, “Is God listening?  Does God care?  Where is God?  Why is God not present when God promised?  Why must our people suffer?  Why must our people go on living in such pain?”  And the prophet is, at first, when called to respond to the pain of the people by God, somewhat reluctant.  But when immersed in the struggle, feeling the pain the people feel, and wondering whether God’s character is to be believed, the prophet snaps, and begins to ask the perennial question:  “How long, O God, how long?  How long must your people suffer in pain and degradation?  How long must they go about suffering the stinging blows of their oppressors?  How long must they live in slavery, prison, and torture while you sit idly by, O God?  Where is your providence and care for us now, O God?  You promised.  And we see no evidence that you are active, alive, and up from your slumber, keeping your promises.  How long, O God, how long?”  The prophet first wants to know if God is woke.

Finally, returning from a God who listens, attends to, and answers prayer, the prophet communicates God’s hope against hope in the midst of despair.  The prophet seeing with God’s eyes has more clarity than most, and envisions the coming new day.    The prophet returns from prayer newly aware how they and their people are responsible for joining together with God in making a new creation.  And so the prophet begins to describe the contours of the new creation so that the vivid detail might goad us into collaborating with God to bring it about.  The prophet communicates that God is active and ready to act as God has done of old. 

March 25, 1965, Montgomery, Alabama.

 

I come to say to you this afternoon, however difficult the moment, however frustrating the hour, it will not be long,  Because "truth crushed to earth will rise again."

 

How long? Not long, because "no lie can live forever."

How long? Not long, because "you shall reap what you sow."

How long? Not long:

Truth forever on the scaffold,

Wrong forever on the throne,

Yet that scaffold sways the future,

And, behind the dim unknown,

Standeth God within the shadow,

Keeping watch above God’s own.

 

How long? Not long, because the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.

How long? Not long,  because:

Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord; God is trampling out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored;

God has loosed the fateful lightning of his terrible swift sword;

God’s truth is marching on.

 

God has sounded forth the trumpet that shall never call retreat;

God is sifting out the hearts of all before the judgment seat.

O, be swift, my soul, to answer God! Be jubilant my feet!

Our God is marching on.

Glory, hallelujah!  Glory, hallelujah!

Glory, hallelujah! Glory, hallelujah!

God’s truth is marching on.[1]

 

The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.  This quote from Dr. King is the sentiment expressed in our psalm for today.   But . . . we acknowledge, as Ta-Nehisi Coates said, the arc did not bend for so many of the people enslaved on the Middle Passage, African-American communities segregated, lynched, or set on fire, Trayvon Martin, or Tamir Rice, or Sandra Bland, Breonna Taylor, or George Foster.   

It was Ibrahim X. Kendi, the director of the Boston University Center for Antiracist Research, where he’s the Andrew W. Mellon professor in the humanities, who, in remembering the longer arc of history, reminded us that when African American people have exercised their right to vote, have exercised their right to hold office, or have exercised their right to be free, they have experienced a consistent push back of white supremacist mob violence over the course of 400 years.   Professor Kendi points to what the super wealthy have done to all of us—the disinheritance they have created, the pressure they have put on our economic system to be like rats racing around for the fewer and fewer resources.   And many of us white folk who have suffered, even more so during pandemic, had their anger educated that the source of their suffering was not corporate elites but those Latinx invaders, those Black anarchists, or even antifa protesting in Portland.  You didn’t lose an election, they were educated to believe, you had it stolen from you by African American voters in Atlanta, and Philadelphia, and Detroit.  When that is repeated and hammered day after day, why wouldn’t they believe it?  Professor Kendi asked in referencing the capitol insurrection “What did you think they were going to do?”[2]

As people of faith in a largely white church, we must take up the task of confrontational education and protest so that the white supremacy abounding in this country is met and stemmed by an other-hearted people who remember the courage of their faith ancestors and hold the purveyors of violence accountable and will not stop until all God’s children see themselves as sisters and brothers, siblings and cousins.  We must rise to that task

Dr. King and that Psalmnist are not about optimism.  They are about a hope against hope.  There is no evidence but for God’s character that a people ground in suffering is not God’s plan and purpose.   Psalm 107 reminds us that God’s purposes are being worked out.  God is active and moving.  Providence is knowing that God is active and moving on our behalf, particularly as we found ourselves enslaved, broken, or economically destitute.

But hear these words very carefully.  They are not spoken from a place of power and privilege.  For when these same words are spoken from places of power and privilege, they become justification for genocide and slaughter.  God does not trample out the vintage where the grapes of wrath are stored to declare supremacy for one people over another.  No!  That wrath is to rightfully restore those who have had their own humanity taken from them, left broken and hurting along the road of life, so that they might know God is their advocate to restore and redeem them to human community.

That it is not in God’s character to leave us in desolate places, hungry and thirsting.  So where we see people redeemed from such troubles in the world, we know that God is at work. 

Even those who end up in prison and hard labor from their own actions and rebellion against God, when they cried to God, it was not in God’s character to leave them in chains and behind bars.  Where we see people freed from their chains and brought forth into the light of day, we know enough to say that God is at work.  

Some people are caught in their own sinful ways and find themselves caught up in destructive ways of being and close to death’s door, and they wake up from their nightmare and call to God, and it is in God’s character to forgive and heal.  So where we see people delivered from their own paths of self-destruction and healed, we know for certain to say God is at work. 

Repeating over and over again, as a mantra, Psalm 107 tells us that where the oppressed are liberated, the hungry are filled, creation is renewed, the needy raised up, and the politically powerful brought low, God’s purposes are being worked out.  It is not so much that God does these things through His power but rather through Her persistence and endurance, acting in love along that long moral arc so that right relationships are built in our personal lives, in our families, in our schools, in our community institutions, in the systems and structures of our government, and throughout our world. 

It is in the nature of God’s character, that God’s providence is found in His persistence and not in Her power.    That is the claim of Psalm 107, that God wills and wants our liberation from anything that would destroy us, even if what would destroy us is self-inflicted, so that we might experience joy. 

Can we possibly hear the good news that God wills and wants and works hard at delivering us from what would enslave us from the outside and what would enslave us from the inside as well?

This is what those Congregationalists believed, one of the historical denominations that came together to form our beloved United Church of Christ, against all odds, when slavery was still the norm in our country and a group of would-be-slaves revolted, took over the ship, La Amistad, and turned the ship back toward Africa during the day.  At night, the Cubans who had formerly been steering the ship, reversed course until the zigzagging ship landed in Long Island.  The Africans were jailed and charged with piracy and murder.    Congregationalist Lewis Tappan headed up the Amistad Committee, that was the precursor to our present-day United Church of Christ Global Ministries Board.   It is the courageous history in Jackson of abolitionist papers like the American Freeman and the Sentinel and Jackson’s history in the Underground Railroad.

In God’s great providence, not in power over, but in persistence and endurance, this church has been part of the long moral arc that bends toward justice.  

And I think that continues to be.  That Biblical story I have come to love so well, the prophet who cries to God, “How long, O God, how long?” is repeated in age after age.  Let us as a church in matters of justice, continue to join with those in our local community and throughout our world, to say for another year, “How long?  Not long.” for we know God’s providence and purpose are being worked out through St. John’s United Church of Christ.   We communicate through our many and varied ministries and missions that the arc of the moral universe is long and that we believe God intends joy for the people in our church community, for those in Jackson, in Michigan, and for all of God’s creation.  How long?  Not long. 

The Bible teaches that persistently and with endurance, God’s Truth is marching on.  And we are marching in the light of that same God.  Glory.  Hallelujah.  Glory!  Hallelujah!  And thanks be to God.  Amen.



[1] http://www.mlkonline.net/ourgod.html .  I have edited the speech to make language for the speech divinity gender neutral and language for humanity inclusive and expansive.  lThe video of this portion of Dr. King’s speech can be found at:  www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAYITODNvlM 

[2] “Ibram X. Kendi & Keisha Blain on Impeachment, White Supremacist Violence & Holding Trump Accountable,” Democracy Now!  February 10, 2021, https://www.democracynow.org/2021/2/10/ibram_x_kendi_keisha_blain_impeachment,

Thursday, October 8, 2020

What did the Vice-Presidential Debate Tell Us? Activism is working.

I have not heard it covered yet. Maybe somebody can point to a journalist who covered it. As I watched CNN’s post-debate coverage, the largely white panel did not bring it up. African-American panelist, Van Jones, did some virtue signaling by referencing the “first-time” status of Senator Kamala Harris. African-American analyst, Abby Phillip, who brings some needed youth and brilliance to CNN, did not bring it up.

What I am referencing is the one question that had Senator Harris lift her gaze off any script or pre-recorded talking point. She began to talk forcefully and confidently about race. Think about that. No. I mean . . . really think about that.

In some of the pre-debate coverage, many of the panelists talked about Senator Harris needing to “thread the eye of the needle.” In other words, because she was a confident African-American/Asian woman, she would need to be careful about her tone and style rather than any substance she would put forward. Panelists admitted that because patriarchy is real and active, Republican leadership and their surrogates would take any opportunity (or non-opportunity — let’s face it, they would have done so if she would have conceded every Pence point) to label Senator Harris an “insufferable, lying bitch (taken from an actual surrogate tweet).” What the panelists went back and forth about was whether Senator Harris would say something or do something that would contribute to the inevitable patriarchal bullshit.

That is what made Senator Harris’s strong and powerful statements about racial injustice in this country even more poignant. She spoke directly to the family about their pain. She talked about the need for changed policy and procedure. She moved from the question about Breonna Taylor and pointed a line directly to George Floyd and said, “an American man was tortured and killed under the knee of an armed, uniformed police officer.” Then she immediately turned to protest! She even mentioned that she was part of those protests. On a national stage, a candidate for vice-president spoke about police torturing and killing an African-American man.

What happened next was even more stark. Vice-President Pence did not try to re-frame Black pain. He conceded it. He sympathized with it. Though what was also missing was the fact that President Trump did not speak to family members like Senator Harris had, Vice-President Pence even conceded peaceful protest to talk about riots. After all of that observation of racism, where he painted himself into a corner, Vice-President Pence then used a non-sequitur to say there is no systemic racism in our country. Wait a minute. You just talked about the tremendous tragedy of Breonna Taylor and George Floyd.

This is what activism has done in our country. Senator Kamala Harris, an African-American woman herself, was allowed to paint the frames for the debate. Without the work of activism, right-leaning politicians have regularly suggested that African-American leaders are racist for reminding us of African-American pain. Think about what happened when President Obama rightly observed the arresting of an African-American man for trying to get into his own house!

In this debate, Vice-President Mike Pence conceded that pain. He did so because activism has opened up a space, a path that made the way for Senator Harris. And she courageously stepped into it. African-American pain was observed in such a way that racism in our country was undeniable. Vice-President Pence sounded hollow and partisan trying to say that systemic racism is not present in our country.

Image for post

Transformation needs to be celebrated. Otherwise, we do not have the necessary energy and spiritual muscle to get back out into the street again. When we train our bodies, we recognize that muscles necessarily break down to rebuild to handle further stress. That does not happen though without celebration of milestones along the way and rest. I think some of us are getting exhausted with the idea that things are not changing. What the vice-presidential debate related in graphic ways is that our nation’s narrative has been changed by activism.

Think about the prolific ways professional athletes have walked into the open space created by activists and become activists themselves. NFL and NBA owners now concede open displays of antiracism.

Image for post

Even creation seems to be joining in! Ibram Kendi noticed that the fly appeared on Vice-President Pence’s head when he began denying racism in our country. Flies and shit. You make the correlation.

No, the NFL still cannot find its way to employ Colin Kaepernick or Eric Reid. The arc of justice, seemingly, does not bend for them. But as Dr. Kendi has written, “Being antiracist is not a destination but a journey — one that takes deliberate, consistent work. It’s work to transform oneself and society.”

For one moment on that journey last night, Senator Harris confidently and courageously walked into a space created by the deliberate, consistent work of activists. Celebrate. Observe. Discern. Act.

Friday, September 11, 2020

Book Report: Ibram X. Kendi, Stamped from the Beginning: The Definitive History of Racist Ideas in America

 In the New York Times series, "1619," Matthew Desmond makes it clear just how important slavery was to the United States economy.  "[A]t the height of slavery," Desmond says, "the combined value of enslaved workers exceeded that of all the railroads and all the factories in the nation." (Episode 2:  The Economy that Slavery Built, 1619, The New York Times, August 30, 2019,  https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/30/podcasts/1619-slavery-cotton-capitalism.html?showTranscript=1) Slavery moved the United States economy from a fledgling nation to a money-making powerhouse.  

Our country's prosperity was built on a brutal economy that was too big to fail.  When cotton farmers experienced a crippling economic downturn, banks were right there to loan them money and prop up the system of slavery.  This is the point Dr. Kendi makes in his incredible book.  Slavery and racism were intentional choices made to increase profits and promote a whole system that constructed and maintained "race."  In turn, United States policy and practice made Black people non human beings.  Taught, codified, mythologized, and even celebrated, some huge African-American pillars of Black history "housed" this oppression and death by suggesting that African culture and Black people  were "less than" and would need to evolve before their total freedom could be given.

My family knows me to be the most unnerving movie critic to relate how movies are the storytellers and myth makers for our age.  Not so much I guess.  One after another, Kendi shared plainly how movies that became iconic for our nation were a retelling of our racist narrative.  How could I not see "King Kong" or "Planet of the Apes" as part of that narrative?  Under Kendi's pen, I saw it clearly.

Kendi states that racism was borne out of self-interest.  It must come to an end out of self-interest.  I know that reality all too well.  My racism with the Native community was transformed and continues to be transformed as I realized the goodness that flowed to me as Native people, with all of their vices and virtues, moved on me.  That so many Native people consider me a friend when I know the history . . . I break into tears.  I cannot comprehend that.  My personal racism is broken recognizing how bringing an end to it benefits me as a whole.  I wish I could say I was more courageous.  

This text is so daunting that it took me several days to even contemplate writing this book report.  Kendi is relentless in maintaining focus so that we cannot avert our eyes from our country's long history of maintaining Black people as non humans.  I certainly knew of the critique of one of my heroes, Abraham Lincoln.  Kendi makes it clear that Lincoln certainly did not see Black people as equals.  

He also, however, takes on Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.   Kendi devoted a whole section to W. E. B. Du Bois, recognizing that as one of the wisdom-givers of Black people in the United States, he really was not an anti-racist until much later in his life.   I found myself blinking at the critical eye he leveled at Du Bois.  At the same time, that unflinching criticism (for good or ill) gave Kendi's prose an integrity that was in keeping with one of his main categories.

He was not telling us the story of "the extraordinary Negro."  He did not want us to think that racism will disappear if we just show any number of African American people who were beyond reproach.  The primary drive of anti-racism is to give African-American people a space where they might be known as full human beings--capable of great virtue and great vice.  He also related the intersectionality of gender and its interplay with racism.  He praised Ida B. Wells as an anti-racist who did not get the platform she deserved.  He also lifted up Zora Neale Hurston and my favorite novel, Their Eyes Were Watching God.  Kendi praised the book because it showed Black people as human beings--making mistakes, seeing beauty, and, I would say, finding love, sensuality, and heartache along the way.  

Though his categories may not be original to him, he has now lifted those categories in a way that will make them primary in the lexicon of racial discourse.  My only negative critique of the text was that although things like "moral suasion" have not created and will not create the necessary transformation around race, I believe we need to bring everything to the table to create the transformation.  I do think moral suasion has had some effect.  

Kendi is right though.  Race is defined by power.  So we will need, as he asserts, anti-racist people in power over a long period of time to create ongoing policy and practice that are anti-racist.  We have too long had virtue signaling toward race while keeping policy and practice in place.  Or leaders who seek to reach "middle ground" when one of the positions is that Black people are human beings.  There is no other side.  Black people are human beings.  Black lives matter.  

Kendi wants us to end racial discrimination in policy and practice.  We have the power to make that transformation.  Much like Abraham Lincoln ended slavery to save the Union, Kendi writes, we must now end racism out of our own self-interest.  I pray we are ready.  

I have just finished three different texts that discuss what it means to be a human being.  We need an incredible intersectional movement that seats people in power and demands of people in power that there is no compromise on that definition.  Jacob Blake's father kept repeating to us, "He's a human being!  He's a human being!"  He knows what so much State violence against the Black community means.  That it happens and we either ignore or sanction that violence means we do not understand Black people as human beings.  

Faith communities must make that a singular focus as they make meaning, critique power, and seek to do justice.  We must come to grips with that necessarily political endeavor.  And then rights must be extended to creation--animals, rivers, land--as subjects (acting on us) who are in relationship with us.  The Supreme Court made corporations human beings.   All they were doing was ratifying policies and practices we have long held in this country over and against peoples and planet.

Some of you know how angry I was at RBG for not affording asylum seekers equal protection under the law (in other words, they are not human beings).

Kendi keeps us focused in a text that is over 500 pages.  That is the power of this book.  My greatest prayer is that white folk will use this text to hold their own focus and work toward Kendi's counsel.

There are more poetic and certainly will be better histories told of race in our country.  Kendi's plain prose, however, has cultivated categories that will be the standards for time forward.  He has a lens that doesn't try to be groundbreaking so much as straightforward, truth-telling, and insistent.  As I read, I could almost recognize the voice of Dr. Kendi behind me, saying, "See?  Is it plain to you now?  This is inescapable."




Sermon, Year A, Second Sunday of Advent, "The Begats Matter"

  A Advent 2 Pilg AL 2022 Matthew 1:1-17 December 4, 2022 (Trigger warning:  Within this sermon are allusions to sexual violence.)      ...