Earth Day

Showing posts with label Parker Palmer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Parker Palmer. Show all posts

Friday, March 19, 2021

Sermon: B Christmas 2, January 3, 2021, "Breaking out of our blecchy vanilla frames"

 B Christmas 2 SJUCC 2021
Sirach 24:1-12
January 3, 2021

 

         In his book, Don’t Think of an Elephant, University of California at Berkley linguistic professor, George Lakoff, describes what happens when he begins his intro-level linguistics class with an exercise for his students.  He challenges his students to not think of an elephant.  Whatever you do, do not think of an elephant!

Lakoff knows, of course, with that frame, that students will immediately go to visual images of floppy ears and a large trunk, perhaps even a visual picture of Disney’s Dumbo.  Lakoff created a frame—an elephant.  The frame acts like a language box for the students’ thoughts and imaginations.  As Lakoff defines it, “Frames are mental structures that shape the way we see the world.”[1]  For example, once I say the phrase “tax relief”, taxes themselves become a negative, an onerous responsibility, not a way to support public schools, pay our public servants, or support infrastructure.  Using the word “relief” with taxes, reminds us that we need some respite from taxes.

Once a frame is created, Lakoff asserts, we basically create the parameters for thought, discourse, and imagination.  “Reframing is changing the way the public sees the world. It is changing what counts as common sense. Because language activates frames, new language is required for new frames. Thinking differently requires speaking differently.”[2]  

Framing is about using language that not only evokes your worldview and makes clear your values.  Framing and reframing can leave us entrenched in an old way of thinking and being; or, alternatively, help our heart follow our head into a new reality.

           So it is in our faith as well.  Once we create a frame for faith in prayer and devotion, we set about thinking of God and faith and life within that frame.  I might tell you to draw a visual picture of God.  Imagine God and, in so doing, imagine the gifts God wants to give to you.   And many of you, though you would resist and know it not to be true, would picture a grandfatherly-like figure in a white robe, and a long white beard.  These days, based on the frames we have been given, God might look more like Dumbledore or Gandalf.  Those images then dictate how we see ourselves, each other, and our world.  Though we might not agree with that worldview, because we employ a well-worn frame, this visual picture of God works on us.  The frame we draw in our picture or naming for God determines how the rest of our faith shall remain stalled in concrete or, alternatively, ever-flowering and ever-growing.

Gordon Hempton, who refers to himself as an audio ecologist, shares that he likes to challenge assumptions.  One of the major assumptions out there is that scientists, who have studied human hearing, have believed for a long time that our ears evolved to hear the human voice.  Intuitively, it sounds right.  Sounds natural.  Would not human ears be attuned to hear the timbre and meter of the human voice?  But if that were true, Hempton argues, we would be the only species on the planet that evolved so separate and apart from the rest of nature.  

           So Hempton investigated.  Is our ear specifically attuned to other human voices?  What he found is that human nature has a bandwidth of super-sensitive hearing.  Most of human speech falls well below that level.  There is a sound that is a perfect match for the bandwidth of super-sensitive human hearing.  What can we hear for miles and miles, ever so faintly?  Does anybody know?  Birdsong.  Birdsong is the perfect match.  “Birdsong,” Hempton said, “is the primary indicator of habitats prosperous to humans.”[3]  It is once again those kinds of truths that remind us that our God loves diversity and that, as humans, we live in an interdependent world.   To ignore God’s love and passion for diversity is to miss out on the beauty and joy that God intends for us, one of the primary ways we know our own safety and security.

           What Hempton found in his life’s work is that humankind was created and evolved to go outside its own melodies and rhythms to find a life that thrives and prospers.  What if God looks more like nature than like us?  What if beauty and joy and thriving are gifted to us outside frames we might have created?  Just waiting to be found?

           Wow, where did we miss out on all of that?  How did faith become so much about rules and regs and hanging onto  carved-in-concrete realities such that we wring all the beauty and joy out of faith? 

Whether we be conservative, middle of the road, or progressive, this time of year sometimes seems to be all about starting anew with resolutions that will make us more dour or stodgy or blechy vanilla than we were the previous year.  Blecchy vanilla, it is making its way into the English lexicon.  You just wait. 

 

We look with uncertainty
beyond the old choices for
clear-cut answers
to a softer, more permeable aliveness
which is every moment
at the brink of death;
for something new is being born in us
if we but let it.
We stand at a new doorway,
awaiting that which comes…
daring to be human creatures,
vulnerable to the beauty of existence.
Learning to love.[4]

 

           In that poem by Anne Hillman, hear the joy of not knowing, the risk of transformation, the call to love wildly, and the adventure of learning something new as a Christian pilgrim beginning a new year.  Rather than resolutions, these are the points of discernment to which God is calling us for a new year.  Spiritual teacher, Parker Palmer, reflects Hillman’s poem with these questions for a new year.  Ask yourself:

• How can I let go of my need for fixed answers in favor of aliveness?
• What is my next challenge in daring to be human?
• How can I open myself to the beauty of nature and human nature?
• Who or what do I need to learn to love next? And next? And next?
• What is the new creation that wants to be born in and through me?[5]

          

But here’s the thing.  We come here together in worship today because we say that God is involved.  And too often we think we can experience the joy of not knowing, the risk of transformation, the call to love wildly, and the adventure of learning something new without having our understanding and knowledge of God, the frame in which we have long placed God, reframed or radically changed.  How can we be more fully alive and spiritually growing and keep the understandings of God we have had since we were a small child?

 I remember being on a mission trip and looking in the night sky to see a moon so full and bright, like a moon I had never seen before.  In that moment, I knew that I needed a new image or frame for God that was different than one I had ever had before.  I became certain that God held me and was tracking me and I became aware of gifts that God was holding out to me that I could not possibly have known before.  And I am sure, just sure, that God smiled, She smiled, well-aware that I had grown.  From that point forward, I could never go back to the smaller god I had known before.

  As Roman Catholic sisters and teachers, Janet Schaffran and Pat Kozak state in their book, More Than Words, “An image of God held at the age of five that remains largely unchanged at the age of forty reveals very little about a God of infinite love and response.  It does, however, reveal something tragic about that individual’s lack of growth and inability to experience and reflect upon God’s action in his or her own life.”[6]

           Some time ago, Tracy shared with me a matrix she learned in seminary.  That matrix created an X and Y axis with the Trinitarian names for God (traditionally, “Father, Son, and Holy Spirit”) above the horizontal line and the corresponding names we call the world around us and we call ourselves in relation to God below the horizontal line.  Changes above the horizontal line required corresponding changes below the horizontal line.  For example, if God is Father then we are God’s children.  If God is loving Creator above the line, then below the line might be the “wonderful world” sung about by Louie Armstrong.  What we call and name God reflects upon what we call and name ourselves and our world.   In the same way, what we call and name ourselves and our world, corresponds with what we then call and name God.  If we are the diverse strands of community woven together, then God is the Holy Spirit who calls us together, the Divine Weaver, the One who in weft and warp makes of us one garment.

           In the work I have done as a spiritual director and teacher, one of the first things I ask people to do is to pick two images or metaphors of God.  The first image I ask people to select is a name for God they have used historically, the image or metaphor of God they learned in childhood, most probably an image of comfort and security.  The second image or metaphor I ask them to select is one of aspiration, an image or metaphor for God to which they feel God is leading them or calling them.  Not surprisingly, almost universally, the image of comfort and security people choose has been some version of “Father.”  The images of aspiration, the image or frame to which God is leading or calling us, on the other hand, in my experience, end up being very diverse.  

           So think on these things.  In this new year, to what image or metaphor of God are you being led or called?  For it may be that in knowing God differently and in diversity, we begin to discern the answer to Parker Palmer’s questions.  What image or metaphor of God would move you out of your comfortable life to one that is alive and what is that life?  (God as Walking Partner, Befriender of the Friendless, or God of Struggle) Out of that image or metaphor, how are you being challenged by God to be more fully human?  (Maybe a God who is Mystery, Daring One, or Breath of the Cosmos) What new beauty in humanity or the created world does the image or metaphor of God open you up to?  (Giver of Gifts, Keeper of Promises, or Flower of My Heart) With this new image or metaphor of God, what new people or place are you now called to love next?  (Immigrant God, Resilient and Homeless Youth) And then next?  (God of My Enemies, Sister to My Soul) And with this new image or metaphor of God, what is now being born in you?  How will you be transformed by it over the course of the year?  (Perhaps God acting as Midwife, Birth Mother, Risk Taker.)

           As Schaffran and Kozak relate, (quote) “[T]he development of positive, life-giving images is vital for adult faith.  This use of the imagination involves openness to being influenced by something or someone outside of ourselves in order to learn life’s meaning, depth, and possibilities.  We will be creating new images of God.  In the process, we are changed.  We grow.  We respond to a God who is revealed in a marvelous variety of ways.  Through these new images of God we find ourselves challenged to live, to love, and to act justly.”[7] (end quote)

           These names, frames, images, and metaphors for God orient us in the universe.  And, too often, what we do not realize, is that when we learn new details of the mystery and breadth of God, gifts we did not know were possible begin to emerge.  The world becomes bigger and brighter.  God’s love expands in ways we could not have thought possible.  We do not think of God as just an elephant.  We become aware that not only a human voice, but a bird’s song may be calling us to a place where we experience prosperous health and life we could not have otherwise imagined possible. 

           Today we read a Scripture passage that is one of the passages the author of the Gospel of John probably referenced to write the 1st Chapter of John.  In the beginning was the Word or Wisdom, and Wisdom, the Divine Architect, the One who seems to be both creature and divine at the beginning of all creation, is definitively female. 

More than any other issue that gets me in trouble in churches is when I use a metaphor or image for God that is profoundly female. 

In a previous church I served, I preached what I thought to be a liturgically beautiful sermon.  God was a Grandmother who left a light on in every section of the house, hoping we would come home.  When we did not, God, as Grandmother, put on her best winter coat and tightened her scarf to go out into the wind and snow to find us.  Someone in the church was so alarmed at this female image, that he campaigned for equal time when a more conservative voice might offer neglected male images to offset one Sunday when I used a female reference.  Every Sunday praying “Our Father.” Many Sundays hearing about Mike’s failed attempts at baseball excellence.  And he was alarmed by one Sunday when I referenced God as Grandmother.  Are we really that afraid of our own growth that we think God needs to be defended by circling the wagons and battening down the hatches of our souls?

           It would seem that one of the reasons we or others who have left the church might experience faith as “blecchy vanilla” much too often is that we consistently make choices for our own lives and our lives together that rhyme with comfort rather than risk.  Perhaps we are entangled in frames that are about what we learned and recited as creed with no thought given to growth, that do not open us to the many gifts and joys and energy God intends for us. 

           In the Scripture read, we learn that Wisdom came forth from the mouth of the Most High and covered the earth like a mist.  She was co-creating the earth and all of its foundations with God at the beginning of time.  What would it mean if we saw the activity of God not intervening in some miraculous events once in a grand while, but like a mist that pervaded all of creation, reflecting and refracting the goodness of God throughout—that the flower petal was a result of the tender finger of God outstretched to us in beauty, that the buffalo might be a sign and symbol God intended for our sustenance and well-being, that you, in all your diverse physical flaws might be known to God as beautiful and treasured . . . as you are? 

I had a colleague in seminary who would say with frequency, “If we knew God as a poor, pregnant refugee woman, we would indeed know why God loves so much.”  What might happen in our lives if we learned that God suffered and struggled in love such that the image or frame we called forward was tender and kind in mercy?  Because God knew what it was to need tenderness and kindness and mercy so desperately?

           What is that image of aspiration, that metaphor, that name for God to which you are being called or led?  Maybe it is not something you know for certain but something that allows you to unravel with life’s questions.  Perhaps it is like the great poet, Rainer Marie Rilke wrote in 1903, counseling a young friend:

I want to beg you, as much as I can, dear Sir, to be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and to try to love the questions themselves like locked rooms and like books that are written in a very foreign tongue.  Do not seek now seek the answers, which cannot be given you because you would not be able to live them.  And the point is, to live everything.  Live the questions now.  Perhaps you will then gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answer.[8] 

 

God is not an elephant and cannot solely be defined by the frame of Father.  We would do best, to live into the joy and the adventure and risk of a new year by listening for the almost imperceptible sound of a birdsong that might lead us to a new place where we might grow and prosper and live into life’s answers.  God has far more intended for us than we could imagine.  Ah, but we have to imagine outside the childhood frames and boxes that a living faith outgrows so that we might receive the new and extravagant gifts God intends for us. 

For the new year, I also had Lily, our new Office Administrator, send ahead a coloring page with New Year’s frames that you might decorate and beautify and answer these three questions: 

Question 1:  What name for God do I use that brings me a sense of comfort and peace to guide me throughout 2021?

 

Question 2:  What name for God do I use that will call me to growth and a deeper love in 2021?

 

Question 3:  What name for God will I use in 2021 that will move me to action?  

 

I invite you to post that coloring page, however you beautify it, with those answers in the frames, somewhere prominently in your home.  Maybe place it on your night stand near your bed?  Or you could use a magnet to attach it to your fridge?  Wherever you place it, make it a location that helps you to reflect on your relationship with God on a daily basis.  As you reflect, you will become more aware of God's presence bringing peace, calling you to growth, and move you to action.   As your pastor, my prayer is that these frames will help you to have a faith that is ever-flowering and ever-growing.  May it be so.  Amen. 



[1] George Lakoff, Don’t Think of an Elephant:  Know Your Values and Frame the Debate (White River Junction, Vermont:  Chelsea Publishing, 2004), p. xv.

[2] Ibid.

[3] “Interview with Gordon Hempton,” On Being with Krista Tippett, December 25, 2014.  http://onbeing.org/program/gordon-hempton-the-last-quiet-places-silence-and-the-presence-of-everything/transcript/7149#main_content. 

[4]Anne Hillman, “Life Prayer,” A Pilgrim’s Journey to the Great Better http://heartsteps.org/2014/life-prayer-2/.

[5] Parker Palmer, “Five Questions for Crossing the Threshhold,” On Being with Krista Tippett, December 31, 2014, http://onbeing.org/blog/five-questions-for-crossing-the-threshold/7167.

[6] Janet Schaffran and Pat Kozak, More Than Words:  Prayer and Ritual for Inclusive Communities  (Oak Park, IL:  Meyer Stone Books, 1986), p. 12.

[7] Ibid, p. 13.

[8] Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet, Worpswede, near Belgium, July 16, 1903.  http://www.carrothers.com/rilke4.htm

 

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Sermon, Second Sunday after Epiphany, Remembering Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., January 18, 2015

B Epiphany 2 BFC 2015
I Samuel 3-4:1
January 18, 2015

Generally, Christian spirituality holds aloft two overarching values:  balance and freedom.  Their definitions overlap such that one cannot be defined without the other.  Balance is the freedom to not be blown about by every breeze, get caught up in the flow of every tide, moved by the profit margin, or enmeshed in every fashionable political or Hollywood intrigue.  Freedom is the balance to speak and live our lives in a way that honors our highest values in keeping with the Heart of God.  When one is free, our choices move from black and white to a rainbow of colors we did not think possible—creativity and life breaks forth in the grayest of places.  I think freedom is best defined in a quote from Dr. Cornel West who regularly says, “If your success is defined as being well-adjusted to injustice and well-adapted to indifference, then we don’t want successful leaders. We want great leaders who love the people enough and respect the people enough to be unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.”[1] 
In the Biblical tradition, this is who a prophet is:  a great leader willing to bear the truth to the board room and the voting booth, to city hall and the supermarket, to preach tough news to the principalities of power and good news to the poor and oppressed.  The prophet does not speak on behalf of a singular individual but on behalf of the wider community, nation, and world.  
Today we read one of my most beloved Scripture verses, I Samuel, Chapter 3, through Chapter 4, verse 1.  It is a Scripture passage intended as a template for all prophets.  God speaks, the Word of the Living God calls, and the prophet shows themselves to be worthy by merely saying, “Here I am.”  It is an echo of the call and response between Moses and God in Exodus, Chapter 3, when God says, “Here I Am” as a way of relating God’s own character to Moses.  God self-defines as the one who shows up, is present, and makes known that there is work to be done.  Moses, in return, shows himself to be a God-bearer, a truth-bearer, a prophet by saying, “Here I am,” when God speaks and calls.  In the same manner, Mary of Nazareth, in the Gospel of Luke, shows herself to be a prophet when God speaks and calls and she says, “Here I am.”  In our passage for today, the young boy, Samuel, shows himself to be a God-bearer, a prophet by saying, “Here I am.”  Here I am.  I will show up.  I will be present.  There is work to be done. 
One of the reasons I love this passage from I Samuel is how it relates the mythic and poetic nature of Scripture.  When we confine Scripture to petty moralisms and simple logic, we miss the broad sweep of a poet’s heart.  This passage has these beautifully mythic lines which unpack into wider realities. 
To compare in modern culture, there are these great movie quotes which are mythic in nature, right?  They set the stage, open or close a story in such a way that broad narratives are painted bigger than the literal words themselves.  If a picture is worth a thousand words, a good story told through movies spans generations.  "Of all the gin joints, in all the towns, in all the world, she walks into mine.”  An iconic line that opens the movie, “Casablanca.” Or the ending of “Gone With the Wind”, when Rhett has finally had enough and says, “Frankly, my dear, I don’t give a damn.” 
“There’s no crying in baseball!” from a “A League of Their Own” to convey the strength of women found in both toughness and vulnerability.   Or from one of the best movies of 2014, “The Imitation Game”:  “Sometimes it is the people no one imagines anything of, who do the things no one can imagine.”  Indeed, the young boy Samuel, who works like an altar boy for the priest Eli who is the God-bearer no one can imagine.  Eli, the priest, his sons,  those pastor’s kids, meanwhile, have grown fat on the offerings the community has brought to them, keeping the best parts for themselves—a clear violation of the covenant which asks that the best and first parts be first offered to God who then returns it to the community for their welfare and benefit.  Eli’s sons were to be the most likely God-bearers we could imagine.  But the story doesn’t go that way.
There are these wonderfully mythic lines which open and close our Biblical story for today.  They are verses which remind us that this story is found in all ages and places.  The passage opens with, “And the word of the Living God was precious in those days, visions were not widespread.”  The passage ends with, “And the word of Samuel was for all of Israel . . .”  Not for priests and kings of position and power, not for the sons of priests who take advantage of their birthright and inheritance, not for any, chosen few.  The word of Samuel was for all of Israel. 
Finally, there is that mythic line within this story which holds me transfixed as I try to decipher its poetic meaning:  “And Samuel grew up, and the Living God was with him, and did not let any of his words fall to the ground.”  What does that mean?  Does that mean that Samuel’s words lasted and endured, had substance and were solid, or as Tracy suggested to me, were heard and received by the whole community.  For words that fall to the ground are ones that do not find purchase in the hearts and minds of those who hear them.   And God did not let any of Samuel’s words fall to the ground because people listened and were moved to action by them.  Is it that?  Or is it because Samuel spoke with an authority born out of the wildness and freedom given to him by God?  Or is it merely that Samuel’s words did not fall to the ground because they were spoken by God through the young boy, Samuel?
When does God come and speak to us mere mortals?  How do we know?  When is it known that the Living God speaks, is heard, and the words do not fall to the ground?  Absent a voice from the heavens, a cataclysmic lightning strike, or a dove sent to circle overhead, how do we know when God speaks?  How do we know any of us know that we are called by the Living God to do the work that is before us?  How do we know that any one of us is called? 
That word, “call” is one used much too often at seminary to describe the work of people in ordained ministry.  Does it require a halo or a special gleam?  A kind of look?  I know I do not have it. 
Some years ago, while I was in vacation in New Mexico, I decided to take a walk outside the hotel where we were staying just outside the campus of the University of New Mexico.  There they were, like I have seen on many a college campus.  A group of young men from Campus Crusade for Christ were stopping people at each street corner to ask whether passersby had received Jesus Christ as our personal Lord and Savior.  The little voice inside my head just kept saying, “Leave me alone, leave me alone, just please leave me alone.” 
I thought my prayers to the Almighty were answered when a co-ed walking down the opposite corner seemed to attract the attention of the “saved” young men.  They gravitated to her.  Unfortunately for me, she made it abundantly clear she wanted nothing to do with their salvation.  One of the guys gave up and turned his attention toward me.  “Have you received Jesus Christ as your personal Lord and Savior?”  Casually, and in stride, I said, “Thanks, but I’m already a Christian pastor.”  The guy stopped in his tracks, and he said , with a harrumph, “Yeah, right.” 
So . . . very clearly, I have to work on my earthly glow, that sign that heaven has anointed and called me to preach the good news.  Because it sure ain’t evident to many folk.  How do we know that the Word of God comes to some guy walking on the sidewalk in New Mexico, the most famous television preacher, a young boy who has been dedicated by his mother to the service of the Living God?  I think one clue is found in the beautiful words at the end of the passage read today:  “And the word of Samuel was for all of Israel.” 
Many of us have heard the story of Rosa Parks.  As a secretary for the NAACP, a person with some gravitas in the Civil Rights struggle, Rosa Parks was considered an ideal candidate to begin the Montgomery bus boycott by refusing to give up her seat in what were considered the “white sections.”  But nine months before Rosa Parks, a 15-year old girl named Claudette Colvin had refused to give up her seat.  The older Parks befriended the Claudette, learned from Claudette’s example, and the African-American community in Montgomery, Alabama, began a spiritual practice of fasting that was key in the struggle for racial justice. 
On March 2, 1955, 15 year-old Claudette Colvin refused to stand up and give up her seat to a white woman.  By her recollection, she could not get up.  There were people inspiring her courage.  Colvin remembers:
 My head was just too full of black history, you know, the oppression that we went through. It felt like Sojourner Truth was on one side pushing me down, and Harriet Tubman was on the other side of me pushing me down. I couldn't get up.[2]

For a young girl, Colvin was also politically active.  She had high aspirations to be President one day and was a member of the NAACP Youth Council.  Her classmate, Annie Larkins, remembers Colvin, in refusing to give up her seat, shouting over and over again, “It’s my constitutional right.”  Said Larkins, “She had decided on that day that she was not going to move.”[3] 
          Claudette Colvin stood on the shoulders of Sojourner Truth and Harriet Tubman.  Rosa Parks stood on the shoulders of 15-year old Claudette Colvin.   
Not unlike the early 60s when Mississippi was a state sweltering with injustice or Alabama was a state with a governor whose lips were dripping with words of “interposition” and “nullification”, on this week when we become painfully more aware of the violence, of racial injustice, the movie “Selma” makes its way into our theaters, and we celebrate the birth of a leader and prophet from another generation, we might term these days in our country as a time when the words of the Living God are precious and visions not widespread.  In such a time, leaders and prophets are needed who are unbought, unbound, unafraid, and unintimidated to tell the truth.
And more and more spiritual leaders are saying that the particular enterprise needed at this time is none other than non-violent actions which will build democracy.  In book after book, magazine after magazine, in blog after blog of those people I read as spiritual mentors, Cornel West and Tavis Smiley, Sister Joan Chittister and Chris Hedges, Amy Goodman, Frances Moore Lappe, and Rita Nakashima Brock, democracy is a way that we remember that God’s word is for all of God’s people. 
Quaker spiritual leader, Parker Palmer, wrote a book in 2011, Healing the Heart of Democracy.  In that book, Palmer offers five habits of the heart that will help sustain democracy.  Palmer suggests that these five habits can be summarized in two words:  chutzpah and humility.  Within those habits, Palmer reminds us that it took a village to raise Rosa Parks and it took a community to translate her act into social change.  There is much complexity in the world today, and Palmer believes that this complexity can only be held by community.[4]  More importantly, and perhaps illustrated by Palmer’s example of Rosa Parks, is that this community can only be defined by intergenerational community.  Rosa Parks happens because of Claudette Colvin.  Claudette Colvin happens because of Sojourner Truth and Harriet Tubman. 
My heart grows weary and sad when I realize that the one place where intergenerational community should flourish, the mainline Christian church, has become a place where the music, stories, and power is largely reserved for a singular age and a singular generation.  As mainline churches, particularly Congregational churches, those people and places that used to be hothouses for the town meeting and democratic process . . . as those people and places now isolate the age groups, they become less and less the institutions and movements which could be the grass roots initiatives to sustain democracy. 
Our children and our youth never hear the stories of their ancestors inspiring them to courageous speech and action.  How is it that we have so many incredible stories in this congregation of prophetic power when so many of you said, “Here I am!” to the call God gave to you, and our children and youth do not know them?  And your words fall to the ground because no young person ever receives them into their heart.
And the words and actions of 15 year-old Claudette Colvin and the young boy Samuel fall to the ground because nobody is listening.  How is that I hear stories of my daughter saying, “Here I am!”, standing in solidarity with a young woman coming out to her parents or painting her nails to stand in solidarity with a person struggling with their sexual identity who committed suicide, and yet, my church family does not know.  I am sure that Sophia is just the example I know while I am willing to bet there are so many others.  And with the resources for becoming vibrant and new and inspired by the word of God right in the midst of us, we are all losing.  We all are losing.  The word of the Living God is given to the prophet for the whole community, nation, and world. 
We are spending time looking for that Word in people who are no longer here while I am certain that if we talked to each other and listened to each other across generations, we would hear the Word of the Living God once again. 
God . . . calls.   And in return, we are asked to be present, to show up, and know that there is work to be done.   May we have the courage to speak and also the courage to listen so that none of the words of the Living God fall to the ground.  Amen. 




[1] I have tried to source this quote from Dr. West but have been unable to find it.  I have heard him say it several different times so I feel confident using it.  I apologize for not being able to source it.  A part of the quote can be found here, Adam Serwer, “All the President’s Frenemies,” The American Prospect, September 21, 2011.  http://prospect.org/article/all-presidents-frenemies.
[2] Margot Adler, “Before Rosa Parks, There Was Claudette Colvin,” NPR, March 15, 2009.  http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101719889
[3]Amanda Dawkins, "'Unsung hero' of boycott paved way for Parks," The Huntsville Times, p. 6B, February 7, 2005.
[4] “The Inner Life of Rebellion, Interview with Parker Palmer and Courtney Martin,” OnBeing with Krista Tippett, January 8, 2015.  http://onbeing.org/program/transcript/7194#main_content.  “Five Habits of the Heart That Make Democracy Possible Study Guide,” p. 2.  http://www.couragerenewal.org/PDFs/Five-Habits-of-the-Heart.pdf.   

Sermon, Year A, Christmas Eve, "Playing our part in the Christmas story resistance"

  A Christmas Eve Col/Paul 2025 Matthew 1-3 December 24, 2025              My Advent spiritual guides this year have been two writer...