Earth Day

Sunday, June 21, 2015

Sermon for the Twelfth Sunday in Ordinary Time, June 21, 2015

B Proper 7 BFC 2015
1 Samuel 17:1-49
June 21, 2015

        In Greek, the root word for both “economy” and “ecology” is the word “house,” “home,” or “household.”[1]  Etymologically then, “economy” means the “managing of the household.”  Remember that as we go forward.  “Economy” is the managing of the household.
          Our Biblical creation myth is a derivative of a Mesopotamian myth written sometime earlier than the one we have in Genesis.  The parable of the lost tree of immortality is found in both the Mesopotamian myth and the Biblical myth teaching that humankind’s striving after immortality is a delusion.  In the Biblical story, that impossibility of immortality is replaced by the necessity of conscience.  In the end, that is all human has for its future:  conscience.  
You will forever hear me relate this factoid shared by Biblical scholar John Dominic Crossan.  Contrary to popular teaching, the word “sin” first appears in the Bible not with the story of Adam and Eve but with the story of their two children in Genesis, Chapter 4, humankind’s transition from a role as nomadic shepherd to settled gardener.  In a departure from the Mesopotamian story, the Biblical story is not decided peacefully.  Rather, the word “sin” is introduced and the advent of civilization begins, when Cain kills his brother Abel.  Cain then goes off to build a city and the violence increases exponentially.  God declares that whoever kills Cain will suffer sevenfold vengeance.  Lamech declares that he has killed a young man for wounding him, and whoever kills him will be avenged greater than one who would kill Cain, seventy-seven fold. 
Crossan therefore says, that escalatory, retributive violence is humankind’s original sin, laced within our primal myth as to how we build and keep civilization.  It comes with a warning:  “Sin is lurking at the door.  Its desire is for you; you must master it.”  Genesis, chapter 4, verse 9.  The teaching in the story says that this original sin is innate and unavoidable but a free choice.  It is not a matter of God sanctioning this violence which makes the violence escalate.  Rather, violence escalates due to human consequences.  All humankind has for its future is conscience.
What one tradition in the Bible teaches is, that human civilization does not necessarily need to be built by violence and violence is not necessarily woven into our human nature.[2]  As a Christian, Crossan believes Jesus looked deep into his tradition to counter the idea that retributive, escalatory violence is necessary.  Retributive, escalatory violence is necessary to protect me and my own, to get the jump on you who will harm me, to show my armor and weaponry superior to yours, there is a need to go bigger, to exact more damage so that civilization might be secured and peace might be achieved.  In contrast, Jesus taught:  we belong to each other.
Crossan outlines this whole argument in his most recent book, Is God Violent? How to Read the Christian Bible and Still be a Christian.  Against this normalcy of retributive, escalatory violence in human civilization meted out by those who believe they are doing justice, Crossan believes, is the Radicality of God found in distributive justice.  Two traditions, one Bible.  Which one will carry the day?
For example, the Radicality of God says, “The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine; with me you are but aliens and tenants.” (Leviticus 25:23).  In contrast, the normalcy of violence through civilization building says, “All right, but I can still make loans with land as collateral.  That is not buying and selling but about loaning and foreclosing.”[3]  Hear the violence that happened to so many American families, our family included, in the recent debt and mortgage crisis.  Hear within that the idea that I outlined a couple weeks ago, “The king takes away as a spiritual practice that normalizes the violence of civilization.”
The normalcy of civilization’s violence over and against the Radicality of God is what is at issue in the David and Goliath story.  Shall Israel be shaped by normalizing the violence of civilization or shall it be shaped by the Radicality of God?  In a critique of the sin to go bigger, get the jump, and show my weaponry and armor superior to yours, David pushes aside the armor offered to him by King Saul and goes to meet Goliath in the valley between the two armies. 
And Goliath is the epitome of armed-to-the-teeth violence—a culture and civilization driven and operating by its value that violence and all of its trappings—triumphs.  Not only is Goliath an impressive physical specimen, we learn that the Philistines are far more technologically advanced than the Israelites.  The Philistines drive chariots, Goliath wears a helmet of bronze, armor of bronze upon his chest and legs, and holds a spear that is an impressive weight of iron.  Goliath walks out into what we have come to proverbially refer to as “No-Man’s Land”, the space between two warring armies.  Scripture literally refers to Goliath as “The Man In Between” or the one who walks into inhuman country.[4]  For, inevitably, as we normalize civilization with our violence, escalate that violence to maintain and keep civilization, this is who we become over the long haul.  We become inhuman. 
The very caution of this story begins way back at the beginning of Israel’s history with its own demand for a king.  The prophet Samuel tells the people of Israel that if they demand a king other than the Living God, it is the nature of kings to take, and take, and take.  In choosing the next king for Israel, the prophet Samuel goes to the sons of Jesse and relates that God does not look on the outward appearance, like other nations may, but upon the heart, the insides, the character, what drives a person from within.  David, as the youngest, is chosen with that very criteria.  It is a reminder that Israel’s king will rule not like all the other kings of other nations, but with the heart of God. 
So who are we?  David or Goliath?
As Rev. Dr. Samuel Wells has said, we are a nation of 300 million people, and we all have one thing in common.  We all like to think that we are the little guy.  We talk about standing up for the little guy.  And in the reading of this story, 99% of us identify with David and not Goliath.  We want the inspiring movie where the little guy wins out over the mighty giant.  But then we spend the rest of our lives amassing our armor to become more like Goliath.  It’s quaint that David, pushed aside Saul’s armor, but look at the degree, look at the job, look at the car, look at the house, look at the country!  We have stockpiled so many spears and helmets and breastplates and swords that we cannot even imagine life with a sling. And then we spend so much money on safety and security devices and procedures, that we can hardly move around in them. 
The story is a caution to human nature which likes its underdog stories but seems to act with the character of Goliath.  And it happens in the Biblical story.  David became Goliath.  David became a bully.  David raped Bathsheba.  David killed her husband.  David became a merciless military power broker.  David became a ruthless acquisitor of pleasure and advantage. David became the overblown beached whale he had begun his career by destroying.[5]  He did it all with a sense that God’s chosen have full license to do as they will, outside the character of God, because they are the ones who maintain civilization’s boundary between what it means to be human and inhuman.
Two weeks ago I also reminded us that we continue to be a country at war.   We order our household through the most escalatory violent means possible—war.  We live in a war economy.  And through two prolific incidents this past week, we were reminded how deeply rooted that economics of violence is in our country.   
With the killing of 9 people gathered for Bible study, including the pastor and State Senator, Clementa Pinckney, at historic Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, South Carolina, we cannot keep pretending the room in our household is absent of racism.  Mother Emanuel AME is a church bubbling with God’s historic work in the liberation from the sin of slavery and the freedom of slaves. Charleston is a place where Denmark Vesey, in the 1820s, a class leader in Mother Emanuel, planned a slave revolt.  That revolt was discovered and Vesey and other leaders of the movement lynched.  From our faith tradition, how can we possibly not see these lynchings of African American folk as the equivalent of the crucifixion of Christ?  Why does that not register in our conscience? 
Pastor and State Senator Pinckney once shared that the military college of South Carolina, The Citadel, once trained its guns on the homes of members of Mother Emanuel Church in case there was another slave revolt.[6] 
We cannot keep pretending the room in our household is absent of racism.  Indeed, when the flag that flies over the capitol building in Charleston is the Confederate flag and the streets are named after Confederate generals, we can assume that the young white man got the message when his room is literally wallpapered with racism.  In the not so distant history, a little over two months ago, in North Charleston, South Carolina, not too far from the place where this recent terrorist attack on nine African-American church members took place, Walter Scott was shot several times in the back as he fled from police on foot, posing no immediate threat.[7]  Eric Liu, former White House speech writer and CNN editorialist wrote,

There is a sickness in our society, as Senator Rand Paul said, that is about violence and mental illness. But there is a deeper sickness -- race hatred -- which is "weaponized" by such easy access to guns. And underlying that is a deeper sickness still: the American penchant for avoiding the past and its meaning.[8]

What we continue to do is normalize the violence done against people of color in our country pretending that what we do is protect and hedge against the inhuman Goliaths who seek to bring down civilization.  The survivors of the young man’s massacre at Mother Emanuel A.M.E. said that he responded to pleas to stop by saying, “No, you've raped our women, and you are taking over the country . . . I have to do what I have to do."[9]  That is iconic racist rhetoric stated as a person who believes he has to get the jump, escalate violence, weaponize and arm his people, to protect against the coming barbarians.[10]  Did he read it in a book?  Was it taught to him by his parents?  Did he belong to a wider group that repeated that so much it was part of his bloodstream?  Or was it just that thick in the culture?
In the media, we protect that notion of civilization by stating that young white men are mentally ill and young black men are thugs.  We know who the real Goliaths are—the inhuman giants and beasts.  So we rob the common, deprive, lynch, circle the wagons, to protect the civilization we know out of fear that inhuman creatures will rob us of our “culture.”  We institutionalize our violence and point out any violence in response to our violence as barbaric. 
I listened as Fox News’ Sean Hannity tried to do his level best on Thursday to talk about the violence in Charleston, South Carolina, and somehow differentiate violence from racism.  It was an impossible task and he ducked and bobbed and wove around the points made by his guests because racism is in and of itself, not prejudice, but institutionalized violence.
Though our church has a beautiful, wonderful history to be told, we should also be honest, as people of faith who are forever being born anew, about how this area of the world was settled by many of our ancestors:  the bodies split open, the children ripped from their families and “civilized” in our schools and churches, and the land confiscated and ravaged.   Layer upon layer of our history has normalized violence against our Native American sisters and brothers and labelled it as bringing civilization in the form of severing almost every connection they might have to meaning.  And we belong to each other.
Canadian doctor Gabor Maté, a specialist in addiction, stress, and childhood development, has made an amazing discovery as to the causes of addiction.  It is not as liberals assume, a disease taking place in a chemically hijacked brain, or as conservatives assume, the result of too much hedonistic partying.  Rather, addiction is about the loss of connection.  Addicts have often led terribly difficult lives, in their early childhood, perhaps very lonely and sometimes brutally abused, many times highly stressed.  They develop a “hungry ghost” persona, always seeking to fill their empty bellies from something on the outside.[11]   So imagine what it would mean if whole communities of people were severed from connection and meaning, how addiction rates for a whole people would soar.  What is need, at the root are policies and programs that build community, create opportunities for early childhood development and well-being, and provide for early health.  Those forms of connection are the best antidotes against later addiction. 
But we seem to be addicted to severing connections to keep the barbarians at bay, a form of institutionalized violence, in this continuing economy of war, so that we might keep “civilization” as we know it. 
The other prolific incident was the release of the papal encyclical on climate change.  Again, remember that ecology comes from that same root word as economy, the ordering of the household.  And Pope Francis makes it clear that economic growth and technology will not save us from the coming devastation to our household.  Our armor will not protect us.  We order our household, create an economy, that runs against the wisdom of the household, our ecology.  Rather, our present policies amount to a war on not only the environment but a war on the poor of the world.  What does Pope Francis recommend, broadly? A turn from our individualism to a building of community to care for the diverse color of the coral reefs as well as a connection with the poorest of our sisters and brothers.  Ecologist Bill McKibben hopes this will be a return to a rethinking of what it means to be human.[12]  The very function of violence and war is to view our opponent as inhuman so that we might justify inhuman acts and behaviors.  We are at war with each other and at war with God’s creation to maintain “our civilization.”  We must turn from our addiction to this war economy.
Today we baptized Lucas Robert Page.  We baptized him with the earliest baptismal formula of the Christian Church:  “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female in Christ Jesus.”  No ethnic difference, political or social standing, gender identification shall keep us separate, apart, or unconnected from one another.  We promise to live into this reality on his behalf, to build community and connection, so that he might live in a world not dependent on a war economy.  We want him to know his full humanity among a Christian community that is coming into its full humanity.  We want him to know:  we belong to each other across ethnicity, social standing, or gender identity.  We belong to each other.
At the time of Paul, Jews and Greeks hated one another and took turns slaughtering each other during the social events within the Roman Empire.  Christians . . . Christians sought to imagine a different world, a world shaped by the economy, community, connection, and Radicality of God. 
Today we said we will engage with Lucas Robert Page to welcome the Radicality of God.  We will engage this war economy to welcome something wholly different.  We will engage and re-connect with the earth and our Native American and African American sisters and brothers to so that this institutionalized violence we call civilization might come to an end.  No more circling the wagons.
Indigenous activist, Audrey Siegl, standing up bravely with her ceremonial drum, the heartbeat of all creation, raised in protest to Shell’s monster oil rig, this week, said, “When we unite, become one and move with open minds and hearts, we are unstoppable. When we connect and stand as an indivisible and determined force for good, we can only succeed."[13] 
Today we baptized Lucas Robert Page.  May we live out that radical baptismal formula by engaging our African-American and Native American sisters and brothers anew, living out the creed of St. Francis’ Canticle of the Sun.  We belong to each other.  May we, as Billings First Church, both historically and prophetically, welcome Lucas into the Radicality, the economy, the household of God.   Amen. 



[1] oikos (oikos) is the Greek word.  For a more detailed discussion of how these words develop from Greek to English see Letty Russell’s book, Household of Freedom:  Authority in Feminist Theology  (Annie Kinkead Warfield Lectures, 1986).  See also, M. Douglas Meeks, God the Economist:  The Doctrine of God and Political Economy  (Minneapolis:  Fortress Press, 1989). 
[2] John Dominic Crossan, “The Character of the Covenantal God: Toward a Christian Theology of the Christian Bible,”  Transforming Christian Theology:  Shaping the Future of the Church, June 18, 2013, Lecture 1. 
[3] John Dominic Crossan, “Christianity’s Criterion:  Historical Jesus Christ or Biblical Jesus Christ,” Transforming Christian Theology:  Shaping the Future of the Church, June 20, 2013, Lecture 4.
[4] Everett Fox, Give Us a King!:  Samuel, Saul, and David (New York:  Schocken Books, 1999).
[5] Samuel Wells, “Five Smooth Stones,” Faith and Leadership:  Where Christian Leaders Reflect, Connect, and Learn.  http://www.faithandleadership.com/sermons/five-smooth-stones?page=0,0, May 14, 2010, Duke University Chapel, Duke University Baccalaureate. 

[6]Massacre at South Carolina’s Emanuel AME an Attack on Historic Landmark of African-American Freedom,” Democracy Now!  June 19, 2015.  http://www.democracynow.org/2015/6/19/massacre_at_south_carolinas_emanuel_ame.

[7] Lawrence Brown, “This is American terrorism: White supremacy’s brutal, centuries-long campaign of violence,” Salon, June 19, 2015. http://www.salon.com/2015/06/19/this_is_american_terrorism_white_supremacys_brutal_centuries_long_campaign_of_violence/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=socialflow.

[8] Eric Liu, “Race Hatred Is a Deep Sickness in American Society,” CNN, June 18, 2015.  http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/18/opinions/liu-charleston-shooting/index.html

[9] Greg Botelho and Ed Payne, “Charleston church shooting: Suspect confesses, says he sought race war,” CNN http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/19/us/charleston-church-shooting-main/index.html

[10] James H. Cone relates what an iconic statement it is in his book, written four years ago, The Cross and the Lynching Tree (Maryknoll, NY:  Orbis Books, 2011)

[11] Johann Hari, “The Likely Cause of Addiction Has Been Discovered and It Is Not What You Think,” HuffPost Politics, January 20, 2015, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-real-cause-of-addicti_b_6506936.html.  See also “Dr. Gabor Maté on the Stress-Disease Connection, Addiction and the Destruction of American Childhood,” Democracy Now!  December 25, 2012.  http://www.democracynow.org/2012/12/25/dr_gabor_mat_on_the_stress


[12] Bill McKibben, “The Cry of the Earth,” The New York Review of Books, June 18, 2015.  http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2015/jun/18/pope-francis-encyclical-cry-of-earth/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Sermon, Year C, Proper 14, "To know we are loved, then to risk something great"

  C Proper 14 19 Ord Pilg 2022 Luke 12:32-40 August 7, 2022              As I shared two weeks ago, it is the oft-repeated phrase in Luke ...