Earth Day

Showing posts with label David Ewart. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Ewart. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 31, 2022

Sermon, Sixth Sunday of Easter, "Beyond the Gulf Motel--Romantic and Rooted Faith"

C Easter 6 Pilg 2022
John 14:23-29 
May 22, 2022

When I first heard the poem, “Looking for The Gulf Motel” by Richard Blanco, I fell in love with it.  Each time I read it, I hear the deep grief and romantic love for a former time.  It is the loss of not only former time, waxing nostalgic, but also for a father too-soon lost, a longing for that time, a time that reminds someone of their childhood, however imperfect.   The remembrance of this past brings with it memories of care and familial love and a special time on vacation.  These memories come with insider, devotional language, rites, and rituals.  “Looking for the Gulf Motel”:

“Marco Island, Florida

“There should be nothing here I don’t remember . . .

“The Gulf Motel with mermaid lampposts
and ship’s wheel in the lobby should still be
rising out of the sand like a cake decoration.
My brother and I should still be pretending
we don’t know our parents, embarrassing us
as they roll the luggage cart past the front desk
loaded with our scruffy suitcases, two-dozen
loaves of Cuban bread, brown bags bulging
with enough mangos to last the entire week,
our espresso pot, the pressure cooker–and
a pork roast reeking garlic through the lobby.
All because we can’t afford to eat out, not even
on vacation, only two hours from our home
in Miami, but far enough away to be thrilled
by whiter sands on the west coast of Florida,
where I should still be for the first time watching
the sun set instead of rise over the ocean.

“There should be nothing here I don’t remember . . .

“My mother should still be in the kitchenette
of The Gulf Motel, her daisy sandals from Kmart
squeaking across the linoleum, still gorgeous
in her teal swimsuit and amber earrings
stirring a pot of arroz-con-pollo, adding sprinkles
of onion powder and dollops of tomato sauce.
My father should still be in a terrycloth jacket
smoking, clinking a glass of amber whiskey
in the sunset at the Gulf Motel, watching us
dive into the pool, two boys he’ll never see
grow into men who will be proud of him.

“There should be nothing here I don’t remember . . .

“My brother and I should still be playing Parcheesi,
my father should still be alive, slow dancing
with my mother on the sliding-glass balcony
of The Gulf Motel. No music, only the waves
keeping time, a song only their minds hear
ten-thousand nights back to their life in Cuba.
My mother’s face should still be resting against
his bare chest like the moon resting on the sea,
the stars should still be turning around them.

“There should be nothing here I don’t remember . . .

“My brother should still be thirteen, sneaking
rum in the bathroom, sculpting naked women
from sand. I should still be eight years old
dazzled by seashells and how many seconds
I hold my breath underwater–but I’m not.
I am thirty-eight, driving up Collier Boulevard,
looking for The Gulf Motel, for everything
that should still be, but isn’t. I want to blame
the condos, their shadows for ruining the beach
and my past, I want to chase the snowbirds away
with their tacky mansions and yachts, I want
to turn the golf courses back into mangroves,
I want to find The Gulf Motel exactly as it was
and pretend for a moment, nothing lost is lost

           I want to find the Gulf Motel exactly as it was.  My father should still be alive, slow dancing.  Ugh, the pain of that.  The longing of that.  We can hear the loss, written in such romantic, devotional language of an adult reflecting on his 8 year-old memories.    

The Gospel of John is written with similar intent and language.  Many of its verses have been translated so literally that the beautiful, poetic devotional language is lost.  “I am the way, the truth, and the life.  No one comes to the loving Creator but through me.”  That language is not to be understood literally, but out of deep devotion to a way and path with a singular and exclusive will. 

           I have used this example before to talk about when spiritual language is devotional and how, when we take it literally, we miss the point of beautiful, devotional language.  Let me give it another try.  If I had a southern friend who, in reference to two people who were wildly, romantically in love, said “She’s so crazy about that woman, it’s like she hung the moon.” And I said, “Oh, I don’t think his ladder would reach that high.” Imagine the reaction I would get . . . .

For the author of the gospel of John, the language of discipleship is the language of deep devotion.   The Gospel of John is written to people who are forming their faith in the face of tremendous persecution and are pulling on the collective memory of a time and a leader who brought incredible life to communities in rural Galilee.  And that language of devotion is necessary, the Jesus in John believes, to make sure disciples of Jesus hang in there as they see their Jewish sisters and brothers experiencing the tragedy and trauma of torture and death.  Hopefully, romantic, poetic, and devotional language keeps you hanging in there, even remembering that the leader of your movement went through shameful torture and death at the hands of the Romans.

What we see too often in the evangelical churches, however, is this romantic language taken literally with no understanding of its context.  That language propels people within the evangelical tradition forward with great power, gives them energy for their faith and tradition.  But the other side of that is when Evangelical leaders and churches speak with romantic, devotional, and poetic love about their relationship with God and their church--many times absent of critical thought that might bring balance and grit to faith—their faith takes on the character of a lovesick, adolescent school-boy who does not have the maturity or the experience to know something deeper.  

Many of these leaders and churches are in love with being in love.  Living with our heads swimming in the clouds can be a powerful thing.   But lyrical, romantic words and even deeds cannot alone be the substance of faith and should not leave us in the romantic past.  Our feet must also be rooted in the realities of the world and must be moved to look for how God is moving far out into the future.    

Progressive Christianity brings a needed critical analysis to faith that reminds us that day to day life can be hard and difficult and even gut-wrenching.   Our faith tradition seeks to be rooted in the realities of the world.  But our tradition also needs balance.  Sometimes we fail to interpret our tradition poetically, devotionally, romantically, in a way that gives us energy and a touchstone for power in the future.  We fail to be romantic about the church, but for its past, and therefore make it impossible to go forward without any passion and courage. 

All of that good stuff in the church happened in the past.  So we long for that,  hope for a comeback, without recognizing that the Gulf Motel is no more.  We need to be speaking that romantic language into being for what we do now, for what might happen into the future.  

As people of a progressive faith, shared faith can become so highly critiqued that it just becomes a downer.  As with any real loving relationship, both romantic discourse and honest appraisal are needed to help it go forward.  Our faith should be mediated between head swimming, heart passionate, and feet rooted. 

 The Scripture passage before us today is part of a longer narrative called the farewell discourse.  It is Jesus, knowing the end is near, trying to express the relationship he has with God, he has with the disciples, and, by extension, the relationship the disciples have with God.  The author of John uses romantic, devotional language to figure out the relationship between God, Jesus, and the disciples.  This resurrection appearance is also trying to help the church move on to a time without Jesus to what community life can be in the future. 

On into the next chapter of John’s gospel, Jesus tells the disciples that he is one with God and God is one with him.  He implores the disciples to be one with him by referencing God as the gardener.  Jesus references himself as the vine and the disciples as the branches.  They are to stay joined to Jesus so that they might bear fruit.   Jesus recognizes the organic unity—the interconnected relatedness between God and himself.  He belongs to God and God belongs to him.  As the disciples follow, love, and abide in Jesus, they belong to Jesus and Jesus belongs to them.[1]   

Last week I was honored to be a part of a group that beautified the church with other church members.  So many people participated in the two church rummage sales that raised money for the life of our church.  And this church continues to minister to its community by offering a powerfully different gospel that what one might hear anyone else.  Two of our church members spoke truth to us about white supremacy.  And through February we learned significant dates in Black History.  People walk and raise money for hunger issues locally and halfway around the world, food is boxed for poorer folk in our community, care packages are provided for migrant farm workers, drivers are being organized to get undocumented people to needed appointments, plans are being made to see if we can bring refugees or asylees to this area with Berrien Immigrant Solidarity Network, and children made cupcakes to raise even more money to support the people in Ukraine.  Why would this community of faith want to return to the past when what is happening now and being planned for in the future is so powerful?  We have five young girls who are regularly reading Scripture, speaking prophetic truth, forming their faith every week.  And we hear the voices of our children reminding us that God loves fun and play and goodness.  As rapper DaBaby said, “We need to lace our shoes for all the blessings we are chasing!”  We need to stop seeking out all of our meaning looking for the non-existent Gulf Motel!

Several years ago, I was privileged to hear Rev. Dr. Ivy Beckwith speak.  At the time, she was Faith Formation Team Leader at the national offices of the United Church of Christ.  Rev. Beckwith defined forming faith as teaching our people to “love God and follow and live in the way of Jesus.”[2]  I really loved one of the particular ways she suggested we might help our children form their faith.  She told us to do something radical in front of our children and then tell them we did it because this is what people who love Jesus do. 

Beckwith went on to describe five different characteristics of a faith community that is helping its members to form faith. The first characteristic is that we are aware of how we tell our own story.  We tell our story with intentionality and that story shapes our future vision and action.  That story informs our plan for the future. 

The second characteristic of a faith community that is helping its members form its faith is that it is missional.  We do not do things just to serve the people inside our building but our community is present out in the wider community and the wider world. 

Third, such a community is intergenerational in its mutual gifting.  Seniors expect to receive as well as give to our children.  Children develop an expectation of giving as well as receiving to seniors.  As noted theologian John Westerhoff has said, we do things “with” children and youth and not “for” children and youth.  We are mutual in sharing our gifts. 

Fourth, the community is trustworthy.  Decisions are made in open and transparent ways and ministry is dependable.  Is leadership predictable and ethical in their decision-making?  Are they actively seeking ways to make sure that bullies do not carry the day in the midst of conflict?  Also, do people arrive on the scene thinking that ministry or events are to happen only to see them delayed or cancelled?   Expected meetings happen with regularity. 

The last thing Rev. Dr. Beckwith considered to be important as a characteristic for a positive faith-forming community, the one that undergirded all of the rest was “belongingness.”   Not only was an atmosphere of belongingness important for the more senior members of the church but also for people who were new arrivals and the people who have not even darkened the door of our church.  Our church sends vibes out into the community that we want, we invite a sense of belongingness.  New arrivals to the congregation knew and sensed that people in the church wanted them to share in decision-making, share power, and be safe as they explored what it means to belong.  One of the more important questions Beckwith asked was, “How are we helping our children, youth, adults, and seniors have relationships with one another?  How are we building relationships across the generations?” 

As you all decide later today whether to retain me as settled pastor of this blessed church, I pray these five characteristics will be important for being a center for spiritual formation in our community.  Jesus told the disciples, in his relationship with God and with them, “Peace, I leave with you.”  That peace is not as the world gives full of hierarchy, winning, and conquering, but a peace which says, “We belong to one another.”  We belong to one another. 

That is the devotional, romantic, critical, gritty, and sometimes messy language I want us to remember as or if we move forward together, not for a romantic past but for a rooted, romantic future.  As God belongs to Christ and Christ belongs to God, so we, as Christ's disciples belong to Christ and to God.  We belong to one another.  This is how God us--as woven together.  And unless we quickly return to this deep, poetic understanding of the universe, we are doomed.

I belong to you.  You belong to me.  We belong to this community.  And it belongs to us.  We belong to God’s good earth.  We belong to God and Christ.  God and Christ belong to us.   I belong to you.  You belong to me. 

We may remember the Gulf Motel.  We may grieve the romantic past that was once the church.  But we do not need to look to it for a church community where memories and blessings are being made, discovered, and experienced every day. 

The reality is, there are powerfully rooted and romantic things happening right now at Pilgrim Congregational United Church of Christ.  They are things that no church, small or large, should be able to accomplish unless Christ’s peace moves with, through, and among them.  Sometimes it happens because children know they are valued and treasured in the midst of us.  And, as a result, we hear those same children laugh, we see them run, and they then speak their truths to us on a regular basis.  Sometimes it happens because we are willing to mourn what we once had knowing that the still-speaking God and the peace-loving Christ have ever more blessings awaiting us. We belong to one another.  Amen. 

 

 



[2] Here are the elements as Beckwith shares them:  1) Move away from “Aesop Fable-ization” of the Bible; 2) Stop segregating the generations; 3) Develop worship found meaningful across generations.  4) Help parents be the spiritual nurturers of their children and develop a Christian family identity; 5) Teach our youth to speak “Christian”; 6) Allow the theological voices of children and youth to be heard; 7) Do church “with” not “for”;

Sunday, February 13, 2022

Sermon, Fifth Sunday after Epiphany, "Jesus assumes your deep spirituality"

C Epiphany 5 Pilg 2022
Luke 5:1-11
February 6, 2022

 

          We know how the big fish stories work.  As we talk about our magical experience out on the water, the catch gets larger, the danger gets more deadly--"The thing almost pulled me into the water with it!"  And the singular fish becomes larger and larger as a way of conveying not only our skill but that we experienced the epic, maybe even good fortune, or to say, "God was with us."  Regardless of catch, fishing stories are often re-told when the nets come up empty or with a small haul.   We exaggerate when times were good. 

Calvin Coolidge used to go fishing in the cold, clear streams of Michigan’s Upper Peninsula.  Once he was asked how many trout there were in his favorite creek, and he replied, ‘about 45,000. I haven't caught them all yet,

but I've intimidated them.’  Fishing lends itself to such stories.”[1]

          It was the great English writer G. K. Chesterton who said, “exaggeration is the definition of art.”[2]  And that is what the gospels are, a form of art, a poetic, rather than a literal, historical accounting of what happened.  They were written for meaning rather than historical accuracy. 

Today we are witness to one of those big fish stories from the gospels.  Jesus has been out and about, preaching and teaching in the local Galilean faith communities.  He expels demons and heals the sick.  When the crowds try to make him stay, he shares that he has to continue his barnstorming tour proclaiming the good news of the community to those decimated and traumatized by the system.  They now gathered to find life around Jesus—he helps them to imagine life beyond day to day survival.  Jesus calls this ragtag Beloved Community the Empire of God.  He heads south on his barnstorming tour to Judea.  When he returns north to the homeland, he comes upon Lake Gennesaret.   It is not the first time he has met Simon, the fisherman.  Earlier, Jesus has healed Simon’s mother.  This will not be the first time Simon sees the miraculous happen in and through this guy. 

Jesus expects and assumes spirituality.  The air is thick with it.  The earth is abundant with it.  

Fisherfolk should have no reason to expect the activity of God in their midst.  For the Roman politician philosopher Cicero says, “And the most shameful occupations are those which cater to our sensual pleasures: fish-sellers, butchers, cooks, poultry-raisers, and fishermen.”[3] The fishing occupation required certain work habits that lent toward its shameful reputation.  Peter and his lot would fish naked, their bodies smelling like fish.  They would fish at night because there was no way to keep fish fresh in the daytime sun.  Fish were then sold in the morning and eaten that day.  Being away from home and family at night contributed to the low honor status of fisherfolk.  Even more so, in Rome’s extractive and exploitative economy, taxes would have left the vast majority of fisherfolk leasing boats and nets, most of their profits siphoned off with only the very wealthy able to afford a regular diet of fish.[4]  When these smelly, night workers, left their boats and nets to follow Jesus, to be his disciples, they also left that extractive and exploitative economy.

          Jesus calls these low-lifes, these people from a dishonorable profession, and assumes their spirituality, assumes God’s activity in their lives.  Simon protests.  “Go away from me, for I am a sinful man.”  He believes his life’s vocation, his dishonor, must be a result of his sinfulness.  As I have shared in a previous sermon, too often Christian teaching is focused on sin and forgiveness because Jewish prophets had told the people that their sin of violence and injustice would lead them back into slavery, occupation, and oppression.  They were to rightly fear God and God’s judgment.  So conversely, many people saw the suffering in the status quo as something they or their ancestors must have done. Their low status was a signpost of their sin. 

Jesus will have none of it.  Do not fear.  I’m about to teach you to fish differently. 

          And Jesus isn’t interested in doing this as a miracle for miracle’s sake.  He is foreshadowing.  He says to those strapped to this economy there is a new way of fishing that yields abundance.  But you have to leave your wading and do some underwater diving into the deep.  Jesus is not in the entertainment business.  He is in the discipleship business.  The old tools of the trade are left for a way and a path that is vastly different.

          This is the last time Simon, James, and John will fish in this way, the old way.  Jesus is asking them to think differently about what it means to fish and to re-imagine who the fish might be.  As people of faith, Simon seems to believe that they must keep fishing in the same shallow waters and trust that one day God will fill their nets.  Jesus sends them out to the deep, where it is riskier and a little bit more murky.  Jesus asks them to begin thinking who the fish are now, what are the nets.[5]  

Sisters and brothers, siblings and cousins, is this not the challenge we face in each age:  to constantly re-learn who the fish are now and what are the nets?  But that is so hard, right?  Even if we know that the way we are now doing it just leads nowhere.  At least we know the old way.  We know the repetitive, grinding down of our souls, the lack of energy and life where we just assume we are strapped to our past, defined by the wider culture, and not worthy of God’s activity.  And Jesus steps through all that, assumes that you and you and you are places where abundance can be found, that there is a spiritual depth to you.  Jesus says, “Fear not.  Go deep. Follow me.”

Unfortunately, in the present day, our big fish story has been transformed into a “get people into the church story” where we can put the fish in the same barrel and club them into the sameness of submission.   The boat, so often a symbol for the church to later be founded upon Simon “The Rock”, is not meant to be hugging the shore, safe in harbor, like the church so often does, clutching for safety, often performing maintenance tasks, wringing our hands over the nets when the deep calls.  Christ wants us out in the deep where his message and life can be seen in the great world. 

We get often caught on bended knee, declaring our sinfulness, when Jesus doesn’t seem to be preoccupied with our personal sin like we are.  Jesus assumes we are spiritual beings called to deep discipleship.   God does not spend time inventorying our past.  There is too much work to be done.  

With that wisdom, that is my question for all of you, not worrying or being anxious about your past, our personal sin or our past:  What are the deep places to which God is calling to us?  Maybe full of risk?  Maybe a little murky?  Maybe places of chaos and a little unsafe?  I want to give you a minute to think about that.  Please do that thinking about where you yourself are called.  But also, where are we as a church called to the deep?  If Jesus assumes that God is already at work to create our own big fish story, where, with whom, and how might that be?  How does that happen?  Take a minute to think about it and then I’ll ask you for your reflections. 

Who or what are the fish we are trying to pull in?  What nets are we using or do we need to use?

(Pause to ask)

We are called to the deep because Jesus always assumes that God is active in your life even when you feel like your nets are empty.  Jesus assumes your own spirituality and calls you individual, and us, as a community to discipleship.  Who cares about your stinky b.o. or your night time reputation.  You.  We.  Are called.  To the deep.   Praise God.  Amen



[1] Grant Gallup, “Epiphany 5C,” Homily Grits, https://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~lcrew/homilygrits/msg00007.html.

[2] Gilbert Keith Chesterton, The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton, Vol. 15: Chesterton on Dickens (San Francisco:  Ignatius Press), p. 48.

[3] KC Hanson, “The Galileean Fishing Economy and the Jesus Tradition,” Biblical Theology Bulletin 27 (1997) 99-111, Quoting Cicero, On Duties 1.42, http://www.kchanson.com/ARTICLES/fishing.html

[4] Bruce Malina and Richard Rohrbaugh, Social Science Commentary on the Synoptic Gospels (Minneapolis, Augsburg Fortress, 2003), p. 353.

Sunday, September 1, 2019

Twenty-second Sunday in Ordinary Time, September 1, "Sitting at the table of God"


C Proper 17 22 Ord BFC 2019
Luke 14:1, 7-14
September 1, 2019

Maybe your grade school playground had a bully like mine did. Maybe it wasn't even a bully so much as a few eighth-graders who enjoyed their physical superiority by interrupting any form of play or fun that up and coming fourth-graders could muster. Even to this day, I remember the rage I felt because the football or kickball or basketball we had checked out from the gym had been taken by an eighth-grader for the upteenth time. What right, I remember thinking, did those eighth-graders have to do this? What right to take away what was checked out by a fourth-grader?

It was the time to turn the tables.

It was the day I erupted. We had been the victims for far too long.  I had had enough. Injustice had persisted for far too long on the Metamora Community Consolidated Grade School playground. It was time for fourth-grader wrath. Steve Scrhamm, tall and lanky eighth-grader that he was, had taken our football again. He stood there, smug, tossing the football from hand to hand, smiling at the lot of us. In a full display of “can't take it any more” stupidity, I decided to act. With no teacher or administrator to be found to correct these injustices, it was time for the masses to rise. “Sic semper tyrannis est.” Crying and screaming all at the same time, I launched myself at Steve Schramm's left leg and pulled and tugged and beat as hard as I could.

I must have bewildered him so completely, or my attack was the equivalent of a single gnat on the leg of a huge beast, such that Steve stood there and took the punishment from my tiny, little fists—whapping and whapping against his left leg. That is, until I bit him, and he promptly kicked me to the side. But I remember what I was thinking as I whapped and hung on for dear life. I remember thinking over and over again, “Wait till I'm in eighth-grade. Wait till I'm in eighth-grade, and then we'll see who runs the playground and how it is run.”

These were not the early signs of ordained Christian ministry in the cards. Au contraire! I even hate to complete the thought of “Wait till I'm in eighth-grade.” For what I was thinking, was not some benevolent change in the system and structure in the playground. I was looking forward to my turn, when I was at the head of the table.  “Wait till I'm in eighth-grade, I'm the king of the hill, I get to be the big cheese, I get to snatch any basketball or kickball or football I want. I'll be in power, and I'll get to interrupt play time, tease and make fun, and steal all those footballs from fourth-graders.”

Now that may not be the most Christian sentiment, but I do believe it is a very human one that survives with us long into adulthood. When we are on the outside looking in, part of the crowd that is not in power, instead of imagining a day when we will create a different kind of playground, it seems to be human nature for us to dream of the day when we will get to do exactly what has been done to us.  And we have been fed a line, that we are the victims, the dispossessed.  

It is almost like a revenge fantasy, where we have the expectations that those dispossessed will rise up and do to others what has been done to them.  This is a violent game we play day after day, deciding who is victim so that we might justify our violence to gain our rightful place at the table.  

The author of Luke has the habit of grouping healings with teaching.  The sickness or the condition coming before Jesus embodies the presenting problem in the wider world.  In the ancient world, the physical condition of “dropsy,” a swelling of the soft tissue due to excess water, represented the spiritual problem of avarice or greed.  It was said that the person suffering from “dropsy” had a need to drink more and more water without ever being sated.  Dropsy was like a greedy person could never accumulate enough wealth or possessions.  The Roman philosopher Cicero said: “Diogenes used to liken greedy men to those suffering from dropsy.”   

The healing of the spiritual condition, a form of affluenza, is then what Jesus addresses in his teaching.  Eating together is an intimate and communal act.  In the ancient world, eating defined social position and status.  Dining at the home of a Pharisee on the Sabbath, the social stakes are heightened as all eyes are on Jesus to see what he brings to the table.   Jesus heals the physical condition for the man with dropsy.  He then instructs how the spiritual, societal question shall be healed.   As we hear his teaching, we should remember that Jesus’s contemporary listeners are not the usual poor and dispossessed.  He is speaking to those people who have climbed the ladder of the Jewish religious aristocracy.

Jesus does not counsel that social status should be wholly abandoned.  Instead, he advises that for healing, one should consciously and deliberately live beneath presumed social status, to not thirst after social status or higher honor.  To displace oneself to a lower seat is a way of bringing back social health and well-being.  When Jesus tells the host who he should invite to a dinner party, he tells him: “Invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind.”  For readers of the gospel of Luke, these groups should be a memory cue.  They are a reminder of Jesus’s original mission statement when he first begins his public ministry, standing in the synagogue and reflecting on the scroll of Isaiah:  “The Spirit of the Living God is upon me.  For God has anointed me to bring good news to the poor, proclaim release to the captives, recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free, and to proclaim the Year of God’s Amnesty.”   This is a cue that Jesus is speaking into being, enacting a different way of life, a life that has the ability to end the violence of affluenza, that will bring about a spiritual health.  

And the reason Jesus gives for this way of life?   Is that the Divine Host . . . this is the way God acts in the world.  And so as we act in this way, we come into the home and being and practice of God.  It is God’s good wish, God’s deep desire, that our chasing after status and affluence, on the playground or at the dinner table, in the board room or among the nations, the violence and sickness of affluenza, come to an end.  

Today we shared in the holiest of meals, a practice that remembers the many meals Jesus shared on this good earth in a way that was counter to the sickness and death found in the wider world.  We ate this meal to steel our courage, enliven our hope, and say that we would once again recognize that as God asks us to take a seat at the front of the table, we are willing to live in some discomfort, and we waive our hand to say, “No, no, I am afraid you don’t understand.  I am confident in the good gifts you intend for me, Gracious One.  I defer.  Rather, this person who is poor or beaten down by the world should sit next to you.  It is only right and well.” 

And in that moment, when we enact the mission statement of Jesus, God smiles, smiles broadly, and says, “In my house, this place, you shall always have a home.”  And in that moment, we share in God’s joy.  Amen.  

Monday, June 10, 2019

Seventh Sunday after Epiphany, February 24, 2019, "Unmasking a violent system"


C Epiphany 7 2019 BFC
Luke 6:27-38
February 24, 2019
         
          One of the great mythological questions asked in each age is, “What does it mean to be human?”  To even state the question that way is to somehow put all of creation under our feet and suggest that the rest of God’s creation is somehow less than, not as important, as a tool for our welfare and benefit.  I have found myself bristling when those well-intentioned about our Conference church camp, Camp Mimanagish, have asked, with all good intent, “How might we use Camp Mimanagish and be good stewards of this gift rather than seeing intrinsic value in the goodness of the pine and moose, water and rock?”  To ask, “How might we be in relationship with Camp Mimanagish?  What might we learn from it and what does the Boulder River sing to us?”  Those are significantly different questions.  One set of the questions says the camp is valued but disposable outside of human relationship.  The other questions suggest that this earth has intrinsic value outside of human reach. 
Returning to the question, “What does it mean to be human?”  We have historically disguised the question to suggest that some of us are more human than others in a hierarchy of being that some are not worthy, disposable, and some are of intrinsic value to God. 
George Lakoff, retired linguistic professor at UC-Berkley, regularly repeats the conservative moral hierarchy to help understand why there is such social, political, and economic polarization in this day and age.  People who are progressive in the social, political, and economic spheres cannot possibly understand conservative people unless they see this moral hierarchy at work.  Lakoff relates that hierarchy as follows:

• God above Man
• Man above Nature
• The Disciplined (Strong) above the Undisciplined (Weak)
• The Rich above the Poor
• Employers above Employees
• Adults above Children
• Western culture above other cultures
• America above other countries
• Men above Women
• Whites above Nonwhites
• Christians above non-Christians
• Straights above Gays[1]

This hierarchy suggests that all those beneath another are not as “human” or not as worthy as others so that if I should treat one as less-deserving down the hierarchical ladder, why would anyone object?  Either explicitly or just by repeating this as a cultural norm, is this not the personal, economic, and governmental history of our country?  I recognize that this moral hierarchy unfortunately moves through me and dictates some of the worst part of me.  As I watch the full force of the United States government, Democrat and Republican, begin the ramping up to affirm American exceptionalism, I recognize that we are not only seeking justification to invade another sovereign country, almost sure to happen now, but also affirming this moral hierarchy as not just conservative.
          The poisonous, evil Doctrine of Discovery which allowed Europeans to dispossess Native peoples of their land used this moral hierarchy.  It was Governor Harvey of Virginia who said that “savages” had no claim or right to the land any more than “wild beasts” in the forest.[2]  Governor Winthrop of the Massachusetts Colony invoked the very Bible passage I use to say that God has given the land to the community for its welfare and benefit.  Winthrop had an addendum.   He stated that the Natives of New England had not used the land as any European might so the land was available for the taking.[3]  With such an understanding, what is now known as southern and central Illinois, the birthplace of yours truly, was taken from the great Illinois people, because they weren’t really using it in the grand, ole European way.
          Who is human?  Who is worthy of the full rights and privileges of the personal or household, the business place or the courtroom, the government or equal?  If I take a nonviolent knee to protest police brutality or racism as a pro football player of color or as Ole Miss basketball players did yesterday[4], is that more human than an NFL owner breaking the law at least twice through solicitation of prostitution?  Which is more Patriot-ic?  Which is more human?
          At the time of Jesus, the moral hierarchy was even more stratified.  Jesus seeks to upend that hierarchy in teaching we have from the Gospel of Luke we have for today using a shared source that was also before the author of the Gospel of Matthew.  First, Jesus cuts through the idea that anyone’s moral hierarchy is better.  “See that enemy over there?” Jesus says.  “You know, the one you would like to move further down the ladder to place yourself over the top of?” 
          “Yeah?  Don’t they suck, Jesus?”  And Jesus says, “Love them.”
          “Whaaaaaaaaat, dude?”
          “Yeah, love them.  Do good by them.  Treat them justly, honorably, rightly.  Bless them.  Speak well of them.  Confer God’s blessing on them.  Praise them when you see them do right.  Pray for them.  Lift them up to God on their behalf.  Find common cause and solidarity with them.”[5] 
          “Duuuuuuude.” 
          “Yes,” Jesus teaches, “you are to show whole-hearted, unreserved, unconditional desire for the well-being of another.  And stop this transactional relationship thing that makes somebody beholden to you or to create people ‘owing’ you.  Give because people need it not to obligate or indebt.”
          “Duude.”
          “(shaking head), Yes.”
          Jesus does not allow our enemies to become another part of the moral hierarchy.  He does not allow violence to come to them because they somehow deserve it, are less than, or are not worthy of our respect, praise, or prayer.  And in upending the moral hierarchy, Jesus makes it clear to all in hearing distance that we are to be made and re-made in the image of a nonviolent, benevolent God.  
          But Jesus is not calling us to be a doormat.  Oh no.  In this teaching, expanded upon more in the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus uses three common scenes of disproportionate power in the ancient world:  the household with master and slave, the courtroom, with wealthy against indebted peasant, and the one not included in Luke, the Roman centurion and the Jew. 
          If I am facing you, as Master to slave, I will not hit you with the unclean hand, the left hand.  I will use my right hand to hit you on the right cheek.  We are not in a fight.  I am using the back of my hand to indicate you are not my equal, not human like I am.  It is a slap of insult.  If I use my open hand or my right fist to hit you on the left cheek, I would be indicating that I see you as my equal.  I insult you, tell everyone that you are “less than”, by backhanding you on the right cheek.  You now turn your left cheek to me.  You offer me an impossible dilemma.  If I strike you with my left hand, the left hand being unclean, I bring shame upon myself.  If I strike you with an open-handed right, I indicate you are my equal.  You are indicating that you are my equal, inviting me to treat you as such.  It is a sign of resistance to the moral hierarchy.  I, as the one seeking to make sure you know your place in the honor and shame code, am now caught in a moral quandary. 
          Similarly, we are now in the court room.  Peasants would not have used the courts to pursue justice.  This is someone who has means, showing his privilege, his ability to take the basic needs of a peasant.  The ancient world was a two-garment world—cloak or coat and shirt.  In your debt to me, after I have taken your crops, your land, your possessions, you now have nothing left but your garments.  and you are unable to pay.  I now insult you by taking your coat.  Shame is leveled on you as I enforce the moral hierarchy of rich over poor.  But a wry smile creases your face.  You know that in the ancient world, to see another person naked, brings shame not on the naked person but on the person seeing the nakedness.  I take your coat.  You now take off your shirt and my eyes grow wide as you give that to me as well.  The shame I intended for you, you now hand over to me in an unmasking of an evil and unjust system—I with one arm holding your coat and one arm holding your shirt.  Shame is brought upon me as I view your nakedness.  You are now no longer an object I dictate to.  You are a subject who has turned the tables on the moral hierarchy and unmasked the injustice of the court room.
          Finally, within the Roman Empire, centurions could impress conquered peoples to walk one mile with their heavy pack.  It is a way that the centurions can remind everyone who is in charge and whose schedule matters.  Roman civil law dictated that if centurions were to impress someone to walk more than one mile, a heavy penalty could be levied on them.  Imagine this.  As Jesus says it.  They now imagine a Jewish peasant walking that extra mile while the Roman centurion, trails them,  pleads with them to give the pack back, begging to get the pack back.  It is a way of saying that you will not rob me of my humanity.  You will not enforce a violent, moral hierarchy that robs me of what it means to be human.   It is saying that God sees me as quite different than you might see it.  And I will use all my humor, wisdom, resistance, and civil disobedience to say, “I am a beloved Child of God, not worthy of your abuse, your exploitation, or your occupation and persecution.  I am a beloved Child of God.  I am not a doormat. (beating chest)   I . . . am . . . a beloved . . . Child . . . of God!”
          Now we should remember.  We might be able to do this once or twice.  And then those who see themselves further up the moral hierarchy will figure out a response to reinforce the cultural norm.  That means we will have to be creative, engaged, and experimental to know how we will continue to unmask the violence of the system and remember our humanity.   
          Jesus has not asked us to employ violence to counter the violence of the system.  He has not asked us to be doormats.  He is teaching a third way.  What Jesus holds open is the possibility that the Master, the creditor, and the centurion might become transformed by our action and become just too.  Evil can be opposed without being mirrored.[6] 
          Sisters and brothers, siblings and cousins, it is time that we seek to put an end to these moral hierarchies through resistance to evil in creative, confrontational, nonviolent ways.  This is the third way of Jesus.  We must do that in a way that also sees the animals and trees as sisters and brothers but also our enemy who is not beneath us.  Rather, we must also say that we are not doormats to express the beauty, the courage, the divinity that moves in and around us, between us and underneath our feet.  God seeks to smudge us that we all might know ourselves as Beloved Children of God. 
How do we offer this creative, nonviolent confrontation to bring an NDO to Billings?  How do we offer this creative, nonviolent confrontation so that the scourge of violence against Native people comes to an end?  How do we creatively cut the purse strings to a pharma/soporific/addiction culture loosens its evil grip on our loved ones?  Let us begin the revolution of a nonviolent, creative third way, and tear down the walls of a moral hierarchy that are absolutely empty of meaning in God’s eyes.  Beloved children of God:  Love.  Turn the other cheek.  Give them your shirt.  Walk the extra mile.  Repeat.  Then creatively unmask and repeat again.  Amen. 


[1] George Lakoff, “The Conservative Moral Hierarchy,” July 1, 2017, https://georgelakoff.com/2017/07/01/two-questions-about-trump-and-republicans-that-stump-progressives/.
[2]Eric Kades, “History and Interpretation of the Great Case of Johnson v. M’Intosh,” Law and History Review, Spring 2001, p. 72.
[3] Ibid
[4] “Eight Ole Miss players kneel during anthem in response to Confederacy rally,” ESPN, February 23, 2019.  http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/26063456/eight-ole-miss-players-kneel-anthem-response-confederacy-rally.  You know, the place with a mascot of a southern plantation owner.
[5] David Ewart, “Year C, Epiphany 7, February 24, 2019, Luke 6:27-38,” Holy Textures. 
[6] Walter Wink, The Powers That Be:  Theology for a New Millennium (New York:  Doubleday, 1998), pp. 98-111.  Wink’s incredible description of this can be found here:  https://cpt.org/files/BN%20-%20Jesus%27%20Third%20Way.pdf.

Sermon, Year A, Second Sunday of Advent, "We need a story that saves us"

A Advent 2 ColPaul AL 2025 Matthew 1:1-17 December 7, 2025           I wanted to offer a trigger warning this morning knowing that we...