Earth Day

Monday, July 11, 2016

Sermon for the 15th Sunday in Ordinary Time, July 10, 2017, "The Good __________?"

C Proper 10 15 Ord BFC 2016
Luke 10:25-37
July 10, 2016

            One of my favorite comedians used to be Stephen Wright—he of bushy hair and a bald spot, crooked nose and deadpan delivery.  He would say things like, “I put instant coffee in a microwave oven and went back in time.”  For just a minute, your mind would think, “Is that really possible?”  Then his next joke would be, “I have a to-scale map of the United States at home.  One mile equals one mile.”  He would then help you visualize the map by showing what trouble he had folding it in his living room.
          Wright’s humor was built on taking common expectations and experiences and twisting and turning them until your mind was open to the possibility of a different reality.  One connected through instant coffee, microwaves, and map folding, then ended up in some kind of mental limbo after he delivered the punch line.  In the punch line was something outside of our experience or expectation which asked us to continue the story, expanded the world of the listener, even changed the listener’s perspective on what was possible.
          A priest, a rabbi, and a Buddha walk into a bar.  So begin many of the religious jokes I receive through e-mail.  Just reading the joke’s opening line, expectations are built that suggest a punch line is on the horizon.  Humor is built on these common expectations, often a common set of experiences that then has twists and turns to amuse and sometimes open us up to an entirely different reality.  A priest, a rabbi, and a Buddha walk into a bar.  Three spiritually devout people starting out a joke is such a common experience, such a prototype for the expectation of humor, that the last joke I heard went like this:
          “A priest, a rabbi, and a Buddha walk into a bar.  The bartender asked, ‘What is this, a joke?’”
          Parables serve the same function.  Jesus took a common set of peasant experiences and expectations, told them in such a way that people believed they knew the ending.  Then he would deliver a punch line that would ask the listener to expand their heart and mind, open themselves up to a reality not yet contemplated.
          With many good jokes and parables, we start with our common experience.  We all know how dangerous the Jericho Pass is, a desolate and cave-lade area, perfect for a hiding bandit.  We can imagine robbers preying upon the common Jew, someone just like us, stripping us, beating us, and leaving us half-dead.  Banditry was common.  That person lying half-dead along the road . . . that could be any one of us.
          So along come three people:  a priest, a Levite, and a Judean.  Those were the common three, the telltale triumvirate.  Though the priest and the Levite might, upon seeing this poor Jewish person, pass by on the other side, the person just like us, the Jewish layperson, much like one of Jesus’ listeners, would certainly be the hero, save the day.  Upon seeing this poor Jewish person, the Judean would have compassion and stop to offer aid.[1]
          Jesus delivers the punch line of the parable by replacing expectation with surprise.  Though the hearers might expect one of their own as the hero of the story, Jesus opens up a different reality by making a Samaritan the savior.  For Samaritans and Jews were bitter enemies in first century Rome.  Josephus, the Jewish historian, records that in the year 52 C. E., Galileean Jewish pilgrims were attacked and killed when they crossed the border into Samaria.  In retaliation, Judean guerilla forces raided Samaritan towns, murdered the inhabitants, and burned their homes to the ground.  The Romans quelled the in-fighting by crucifying and beheading a number of leaders on both sides.[2]
          So the punch line of the parable is that a Jewish teacher might even consider putting the word “good” and the person from Samaria in the same sentence.  New Testament scholar, Robert Funk, made this clear when he wrote that Judeans considered Samaritans a “bastard race.”  To call someone a Samaritan, from a Judean perspective, was an insult.[3]
          Over the years we have domesticated the good Samaritan story and made it over into a parable about neighborliness.  Beyond an example of neighborliness, the Good Samaritan story is a parable that opens up our hearts and minds to seeing our enemy as the arbiter of God’s compassion and hospitality.  So though we might find it difficult to imagine ourselves to stopping and helping someone stripped, beaten, and lying half-dead along the road, I believe the story asks even more of us.  The story has us identifying ourselves with the person lying half-dead along the road.  Our mortal enemy is the one who stops, comes to us offering the compassion and hospitality of God.  The story is not about what good we can do, but our ability to see the capacity for God’s blessing and goodness in others.
          For a moment, Jesus is trying to suspend the common experiences and reinforced expectations of Jewish peasants.  While Jewish peasants may have expected to hear the good Judean, Jesus is trying to expand the listener’s world, change the listener’s perspective, make the listener imagine something they could not even have, heretofore, imagined.  Jesus told parables to break the expected cycle of violence and poverty experienced by exploited and oppressed Jewish peasants in first century Rome.[4]  That cycle of violence continued as long as Jews and Samaritans saw each other as a “bastard race.”  Jews and Samaritans, exploited and oppressed by Rome, both needed to be able to receive the compassion and hospitality that the other could offer.
          So we are stripped, beaten, and left half-dead along the road, maybe in the alley just behind our building, or on the south side, or maybe just outside of Busby, or a rural, racist community in the hinterlands of Montana?  Maybe Missoula?  How would we fill in the blank?  With what individual or group would we never put the word, “good?”  Maybe it is even an individual or group to whom we have spent our whole life serving, to whom we have donated our time and money.  We are more than willing to give “to them.”  We just bristle at the notion that they might give to us.  We cannot possibly imagine having gifts, compassion and hospitality, offered to us from people we normally serve.
          Some years back, the United Church of Christ identity campaign promoted a poster that had the words Good Samaritan printed out and the word “Samaritan” crossed out.  In its place, the word “Iraqi” was inserted.  Maybe we would take it a step further to use “ISIS” or “Taliban” or “Al-Quaiada” today.  To me, however, that seems a little too easy and a little too far away.  After all, to update this parable, we need two groups that share boundaries, chafe at those boundaries, and might even cross into each other’s territory every so often.
          The challenge is to leave the comfort of seeing this story as a hero’s tale about neighborliness.  The challenge is to have the courage to listen faithfully so that our world might be expanded, our expectations transformed, and our perspective on what is possible changed.  How do we fill in the blank?  The good _____?
          Late at night, a carload of people from Billings First Congregational Church returned from their mission trip.  It was late at night and they were surprised by some people who sought solace from the wind at their back door.  While asking for directions, this group robbed them, destroyed their van, and left them for dead in the back alley.  Now Mike had not finished his sermon at 3:00 a.m. on Sunday morning so he came into the office to make some changes, but he knew something was up and entered by the front door.  The Conference Minister, Rev. Marc Stewart, realizing he had to drop off some promotional material, passed by the church, saw the commotion, and dropped off the material at the front door..  There was another person who came by these lovely Billings First Congregational people, someone we would have never imagined.  And that person was _______?
          To end the cycle of violence we do to each other, the hatred and bitterness we harbor, we need to fill in the blank, figure out the punch line.  And maybe, just maybe if we are open to hearing the parable told again, our world expands, transforms the nature of our relationships, and our perspective remembers that we were all made in the image of God’s love, compassion, and hospitality.  And in so doing, we are open to receiving more love than we ever imagined possible.  Would that it be so.  Amen.




[1] Bernard Brandon Scott, Re-Imagine the World:  An Introduction to the Parables of Jesus (Santa Rosa, California:  Polebridge Press, 2001), pp. 56-63.
[2] http://www.beliefnet.com/story/31/story_3100_1.html, Robert Funk, “What’s Good about the Good Samaritan:  A scholar explains that the Samaritans were actually a hated ethnic class.”
[3] Ibid.
[4] William R. Herzog II, Parables as Subversive Speech:  Jesus as Pedagogue of the Oppressed (Louisville, Kentucky:  Westminster/John Knox Press, 1994), pp. 25-29.  Using the teach of Paulo Freire, Herzog interprets the parables of Jesus in a way that makes the parables gritty and real.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Sermon, Proper 6, "Roman law and order co-opts what it means to be faithful"

  I want to make it clear I would never preach this sermon.  One of my cardinal rules for sermon-giving is that I should never appear as her...