Article printed in Billings Gazette in Faith and Values Section, July 16, 2016
As we
entered into the Scriptural study for this summer, the Revised Common
Lectionary led us through Paul’s letter to the Galatians. In the central part of this letter, one of
Paul’s earliest writings, we find one of the earliest baptismal creeds, “There
is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female in the service of
Jesus Christ.” Think, for a moment, how
radical that creed is in Paul’s time.
Paul acknowledges the wide diversity found underneath the boot of the
Roman Empire and then suggests that this diversity becomes one in mission and
ministry with Christ. At a time of
strong patriarchy, gender and sexuality are not cause for excluding people from
the table of Christ. At a time of
disparate social and economic status, one’s place in the hierarchy is not a
reason for excluding people from the table of Christ.
Even
more radical, to suggest that Jews and Greeks in Paul’s time might break bread
together seemed impossible. Jews and Greeks were mortal, violent enemies at the
time of Paul. Greeks massacred Jews and
burned down their synagogues during a circus in Antioch. In turn, Jews slaughtered Greeks. So to get people together at the table of
Christ regardless of religious, ethnic, or cultural identity would have been
truly a miracle—world-transforming.
What
Paul sees is a Roman culture of law and order that is based on aspiring status,
hierarchy, and privilege. Roman law and
order established peace through military might
and economic domination. Roman peace was maintained by Rome and its Caesar’s “power over” other peoples. So Rome had a vested interested in deciding who was Roman and who was barbarian, who was in and who was out, who was welcome to the table and who was not. As a Jew, Paul also suggests that too often Roman law and order had co-opted and conflated Jewish Law to move Jewish Law from values of “neighborliness” and “power with” and “solidarity” to spiritual practices and a way of life that closely mirrored the values of Rome and its Caesars.
and economic domination. Roman peace was maintained by Rome and its Caesar’s “power over” other peoples. So Rome had a vested interested in deciding who was Roman and who was barbarian, who was in and who was out, who was welcome to the table and who was not. As a Jew, Paul also suggests that too often Roman law and order had co-opted and conflated Jewish Law to move Jewish Law from values of “neighborliness” and “power with” and “solidarity” to spiritual practices and a way of life that closely mirrored the values of Rome and its Caesars.
Rome
regularly defined its enemies through art and
architecture (the newspaper of the ancient world) by referencing the conquered and the vanquished as the wild and unruly barbarians over and against the law-abiding and peace-giving sons of god known as Rome and its Caesars. In that art and architecture, Roman State violence and massacre is justified to keep the peace. Roman general Manlius Vulso justified the massacre or enslavement of 40,000 Galatians by calling them “the enemies of Rome.” In his victory speech, the Galatians were regularly referenced as “terrorists.” In fact, Rome art, architecture, and literature often labelled the Galatians as the people of terror and chaos. Beware the people who call a whole group of people names: savages, barbarians, terrorists, or thugs. Such name-calling of others is often a prelude to the justification of State power to do violence and death against those we call “other.”
architecture (the newspaper of the ancient world) by referencing the conquered and the vanquished as the wild and unruly barbarians over and against the law-abiding and peace-giving sons of god known as Rome and its Caesars. In that art and architecture, Roman State violence and massacre is justified to keep the peace. Roman general Manlius Vulso justified the massacre or enslavement of 40,000 Galatians by calling them “the enemies of Rome.” In his victory speech, the Galatians were regularly referenced as “terrorists.” In fact, Rome art, architecture, and literature often labelled the Galatians as the people of terror and chaos. Beware the people who call a whole group of people names: savages, barbarians, terrorists, or thugs. Such name-calling of others is often a prelude to the justification of State power to do violence and death against those we call “other.”
As I
survey the current state of affairs in religion and faith, I believe that
baptismal creed is still just as radical as it was in the First Century. Paul believed authentic Jewish faith should
be found in values of “neighborliness”, “solidarity”, and “power with”
others. Christians are to be baptized
into that faith. I would argue that too
often Rome now co-opts Christian faith to make it one focused on law and order,
who is in and out (both at table and for eternity), and “power over.”
We can
hardly pick up the newspaper without some headline about Christians who seek to
exclude based on race, ethnicity, culture, religion, socio-economic status,
gender, or sexual identity. The Roman
gospel is a seductive gospel. For as
Christians imitate the Roman gospel, values of neighborliness are trumped in
favor of success, wealth, and “power over” others. “Do you not see how faithful we are,”
co-opted Christians are heard proclaiming, “for God has given us such success
and wealth!” Paul saw how easy it was to co-opt the world-transforming news of
Christ’s baptism. This is the reason
Paul preached “Christ crucified.” Christ
is the consummate conquered and vanquished “other” whose baptism undercuts the
empire’s “power over” gospel.
No comments:
Post a Comment