Earth Day

Sunday, November 22, 2015

Sermon for Year B, Reign of Christ Sunday, November 22, 2015

B Reign of Christ BFC 2015
November 22, 2015
Daniel 7:9-10, 13-14; John 18:33-37

            As those of you who raise children know, once a child likes a book, a recording, or a movie, the whole family gets to hear it and see it not only once but several times over.  So Tracy reminded our family on Facebook this past week of all the long trips in the car when Sophia would request Neil Gaiman’s “Coraline.”  As the first CD was inserted, the rest of us would pull our coats up over our ears as Neil Gaiman quoted that wonderful line from G.K. Chesterton which applies to fairy tale and Bible alike, “Fairy tales are more than true: not because they tell us that dragons exist, but because they tell us that dragons can be beaten.”  At least, it was a wonderful line until I heard it on, I kid you not, twenty straight car trips. 
At every sitting you, as a parent, hear, “Want to listen to that again, Dad?  Want to watch that movie again, Dad?”  Of course, sweetie.  So what our daughter has seen or heard over and over again, the whole family has seen and heard over and over again. 
          As I have related in a previous sermon, one of the movies I still find enjoyable to watch is Toy Story.  For those of you who have never seen Toy Story, the movie is about a community of toys owned by a little boy named Andy.  Whenever humans are absent, much as we might suspect, the toys come to life and fulfill specific functions within their toy “world.”  And again, some of my favorite lines in the movie are delivered by the big, green, plastic dinosaur named “Rex,” short for Tyrannosaurus Rex.  Representing the most fearsome of all dinosaurs, this toy Rex is a rather neurotic fellow who can’t seem to find a bark or bite to go along with his T-Rex reputation.
          I think Rex’s two best lines in Toy Story are:  “I don’t like confrontations!” and “Great!  Now I have guilt!”
          These lines sound very reminiscent of my life lived as the oldest of four children, feeling like I had failed my parents whenever I was not the perfect child—which happened every day.  Maybe that is why I like Rex so much.  At one time in my life, I identified strongly with trying to please people so much that I avoided all conflict.  I also grew up with tremendous guilt if I believed I was responsible for anyone feeling bad.  If not within ourselves or within our history, we probably all know someone like Rex.
          Tracy suggested that is why the writers of Toy Story made the neurotic Rex a dinosaur.  Those creatures and communities which spend their time trying to avoid conflict, confrontation, and guilt, well, they end up extinct. 
          In serving local churches for close to twenty-five years now, these lines also sound like life lived in many churches.  We think we are doing well and healthy if there is no conflict, confrontation, or guilt.  We absolutely hate to make a decision that would make someone feel bad.  In fact, many of the local churches I have served have gone out of their way to be unhealthy so that they could avoid that conflict, confrontation, or guilt.  We allow good, solid, and healthy ideas and programs to be hijacked so that one person or a small group of people will not feel bad.
          In contrast, good fairy tales have necessary conflict to reveal goodness and strength of character.  The story does not start out with “And they lived happily ever after” because then we would not be entreated to read the story over and over and over again. 
So too the whole of each gospel seems to be about conflict.  The central conflict in the book of Daniel and the gospel of John is set before us in the Scripture lessons for today.  Each Scripture lesson represents the clash of two worlds.  In Daniel, it is the clash between empires and their sovereigns over and against the Ancient of Days and the Human One. 
In the gospel of John, in first century Rome, Pontius Pilate, a sub-governor of Judea was constantly in conflict with the Jewish people.  Pilate survived as long as he did because he took care of those conflicts as quickly as possible.  He ruled with an iron fist—crushing rebellions without mercy, executing anyone or any movement that exhibited the least bit of resistance to Roman rule.  In contrast to how the gospels portray Pilate, the historians Philo and Josephus wrote of Pilate’s gratuitous cruelty and brutal way of handling even unarmed crowds.[1]
          The author of John’s gospel has the conversation between Jesus and Pilate go the way of all conversations found within its pages.  Nicodemus, the woman at the well, and now Pilate engage Jesus with an assumption that the world is as it is because God has ordained it to be so.  Jesus has a different assumption.  Jesus engages their world, puts his world in direct conflict with theirs, and seeks transformation of their world.
          “My kingdom is not from this world,” Jesus is often translated as saying in this Scripture from John today.  Traditionally, we have read such Scripture passages as Jesus speaking about some otherworldly, spiritual plane.  “My kingdom is not from this earthly world,” is how we often hear this Scripture interpreted.
          Throughout the gospel of John, the Greek word kosmos has been often translated as “world.”  Within its context, however, the Greek word kosmos is probably better translated as “system,” or “order,” or “a way we do things around here.”[2]
          Using this definition, Jesus is saying, “My kingdom is distinct from this system, from this order, from this way of doing things.”  Pilate participated in, was beholden to, and commanded a world or system of domination.  Who knows whether Pilate even recognized any other ways of doing things besides his own?  Maybe he thought that was the way the world turned.  Brute and raw force against brute and raw force; Pilate, as the ambassador of the State, keeping peace against the insurgents by quashing rebellion; Rome, establishing law and order, over and against the terrorists, the barbarians, and the heathens.  Would Pilate even understand Jesus’s world or way of doing things, rooted in mutuality and healing, compassion and mercy?
          “My world is not your world, Pilate.  My system is not your system.”  This Scripture is not Jesus being anti- or other-worldly.  Rather, Jesus is being anti-establishment.[3]
          It is those historical people within the United Church of Christ, those Congregationalists during the 19th Century who would not allow one to be a part of their communion if that person owned slaves.  The Fugitive Slave Law declared that anyone who aided or abetted runaway slaves would be breaking federal law and fined and/or imprisoned.  Congregationalists built “Safe Houses” to hide runaway slaves, believing the gospel called them to do things in a different way.    Their system, their way of doing things was not the way of the domination system which surrounded them.  It is those Evangelical Germans who recognized that German immigrants and refugees did not have health care when they came to this “new world” and formed a Deaconess movement to provide health care and healing for those without resource.  Their system, their way of doing things, did not correspond with a too often brutal existence.  It is those Confessing Church Christians in Germany who would hide and not surrender their Jewish neighbors seeking refuge and safe haven.  Their system, their way of doing things, did not correspond with the ethnocentrism, violence, and death of Nazi Germany.  It is churches like this one who found a way to surround and support refugees from Hungary like Vilma Reich who now speaks with delight about what great neighbors she has in the gay couple just across the street.  Their system, their way of doing things was not the way of the domination system which surrounded them.  By their very lives, our faith ancestors proclaimed a different world. 
          In the same manner, Daniel does not believe what it means to be “human” corresponds with the unbridled power, arrogance, and violence of empire.  He does small, everyday practices that show he does not participate in that world.  His everyday kosher practice, as a vegetarian, defines him as different as empire.  And every day, three times a day, Daniel turns his face toward Jerusalem and prays.  That is why Daniel is thrown in the lion’s den, because Daniel’s prayers represent a loyalty and source of power not found in the Babylonian Empire and its king
Jesus does not recognize Pilate’s way of doing things as authoritative for his life.  Jesus comes from a different world . . . a different system.  Every day he does small practices of building community by sharing bread, tending to the ill and infirm, and enjoining others to see “their neighbor” as bigger and broader than many of his listeners could imagine.  Every day the early church practiced a radical hospitality and community practice to welcome the stranger, share what they had in common, and blur lines of ethnicity to say that they were not one and the same as the domination system surrounding them.
          The good news of this passage is that the domination system which surrounds us is not the way of doing things in God’s kingdom.  So if there are ways the system, as it runs presently, runs and grinds against us, then maybe we need a new system.  If there are ways the system devalues life, fails to include us into community, and does not allow rest for us, maybe we need a new system.  If there are ways the system tells us we will never measure up, we are good for nothing, or we really don’t matter, maybe we need a new system.   If there are ways the system tells us that we should be afraid of people who are not like us, then we need a new system.
          The call of this Scripture passage is for us to engage the world, or the system as it is, with the love and compassion of God, to transform systems and structures so that they may be life-giving, community building, and Sabbath taking.  The call of this Scripture passage is for us to engage the world, or the system as it is, so that we will know there is enough grace to hold us, that we are precious and cherished by God, and that all of us hold some gift that makes us the Body of Christ entire.
          Now I need to be honest in sharing . . .  that if we don’t like confrontations, or seek to avoid conflict, or are preoccupied with our own guilt, this transformation will not take place.  Too often we have been taught or find ourselves teaching that everybody is supposed to be “nice.”  Conflict and confrontation have historically been understood as a manifestation of original sin.[4]  So we will not only have to come into conflict with the powers and principalities of our day (the Pilates of our time), but we will also have to begin seeing conflict as a healthy part of our life lived together as a community of faith.  As the conflict of worlds and systems did in Jesus’s conversations with Nicodemus and the woman at the well in John’s gospel, so we embrace conflict and confrontation as healthy, we then hold out the possibility for transformation.  Nicodemus and the woman at the well begin with  a conflict of worlds and transform to become part of Jesus’ movement.
          In Walter Wink’s book, Engaging the Powers, he writes, “I consider conflict to be an inevitable consequence of human freedom, and thus would expect it even in the reign of God.  Conflict is thus not an expression of human sin, but of the inevitable rub between a variety of interpretations of good.”[5]  And I believe that variety of interpretations holds out the possibility we all might be transformed by one another.
          The only way, however, we will be able to engage the world, the systems and the structures as they are, and continue in that struggle, is if we have at least one foot in that different world or system.  We must, as Ghandi said, we must be the change we want to see in the world.  For if we are that change, if we live in that alternative system, we have the opportunity to receive the goodness and the life that way of being offers.  We will need that goodness, that bread from heaven, to walk in the wilderness of the way the world is.  We will need everyday practices, however small they are, that remind us we are not part of a domination system.
          I also believe very strongly that the strength we need to be in conflict, to confront the world as it is, to challenge the system and rage against the machine, requires others to walk with us.  That is why we are all here.  Church is the radical notion that we can transform the world because others accompany us in mutual love and support.
          So I exhort you, dear sisters and brothers, to not just become another cog in the machine, a part of the system.  The call is before us to engage the world as it is, to confront the evil which lashes out seeking domination, and, as we do so, to begin walking in another world.  The Bible is often true not because it tells us that evil systems and structures exist in the world.  The Bible is true because it tells us that evil systems and structures can be overcome—by a community of people who are not afraid of engaging the ensuing conflict, have values in another way of being, practice daily stepping outside the domination system, and partner with God to transform the world. 
Evil systems, like dragons, can be beaten.  Let us begin.
People get ready
For the train to Jordan
Picking up passengers
From coast to coast
Faith is the key
Open the doors and board them
There's room for all
among the loved the most
     


Amen. 



[2] Walter Wink, Engaging the Powers:  Discernment and Resistance in a World of Domination (Minneapolis:  Fortress Press, 1992), pp. 51-59.
[3] John H. Elliott, 1 Peter:  Estrangement and Community (Chicago:  Franciscan Herald Press, 1979), p. 52, as quoted in Wink, Engaging, p. 52.
[4] George Weigel, Tranquillitas Ordinis (Oxford:  Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 329, as referenced in Wink, Engaging, p. 385, n. 25.
[5] Wink, Engaging, p. 385, n. 25.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Sermon, Proper 6, "Roman law and order co-opts what it means to be faithful"

  I want to make it clear I would never preach this sermon.  One of my cardinal rules for sermon-giving is that I should never appear as her...