Responses to
Violent Christendom 5
Proverbs 5:3-8; Proverbs 31:30-31; Ruth 3:3-4; Jonah 4:11
October 22, 2017
Throughout this fall I have been preaching on
our necessary responses to the Religious Right, what I refer to as Violent
Christendom. I believe that evangelical
and fundamentalist Christianity, though diverse in its many incarnations, has
largely made a deal with the devil to secure power and wealth while refusing to
be critical of its violent, arrogant, racist, and misogynistic core. To illustrate, way back in February of this
year, Pastor John Pavlovitz tweeted out a
response to President’s Trump’s Muslim ban, “Equality means believing that a child living
5,000 miles away is a precious as the one sleeping in your nursery right
now.”[1] The tweet was shared by neo-Nazi Richard
Spencer and Pavlovitz was greeted with all kinds of vulgarity and threat. Pavlovitz shared that Amy, a Conservative
white Christian mom responded to his tweet by writing, “If you have children, I
feel sorry for them.”[2] Pavlovitz’s call to love thy neighbor is
greeted with Amy’s call to family values.
Evangelical and fundamentalist Christianity
has been co-opted by the very imperial narrative that was the foil for Jesus of
Nazareth’s life, teaching, and ministry.
For that reason, I have argued that we must break out of the frames
provided by the father strict disciplinarian model espoused by people like Dr.
James Dobson and Focus on the Family. We
must remember that the faith taught and lived out by Jesus is not about having
all the answers but having the humility of a Socratic faith—a faith based on
salient questions and always on a road of uncertainty. Finally, two weeks ago I suggested that all
of those difficult conversations with family members and friends around the
upcoming holiday season should be punctuated with not the name of Jesus but the
content of his life, teaching, and ministry—particularly his faith in a
non-violent God and his focus on the economically poor.
In all of those
conversations, one of the regular things I hear from people who try to engage
their fundamentalist family and friends is the dreaded Bible quotes. The blood drains out of our face as we
realize we will never have that kind of Biblical acumen. What
should we do? My first response is . . .
don’t. That is their frame, they have
learned a circular Biblical worldview, and you will never win within that
frame. Reason, experience, historical
Christian witness (like Dr. King, Julian of Norwich, or St. Francis of Assissi)
all provide other discernment tools for how Christian life is to be lived. You can merely say, “Yeah, I have used
reason, or experience, or lives of other Christian saints to help me learn how
to live faithfully. I think they are
just as important as Bible.” And you
would be right.
But if you are going to go
there with Bible, here is another faithful response. The Bible is incredibly diverse. Within the Bible are all kinds of factual
contradictions: historical
contradictions in the order of kings, different accounts of Jesus’s
resurrection, and even Biblical teaching that is intentionally contradictive.
The Scripture Ron read for
this morning provided perfect examples. Hebrew
Scripture scholar, Timothy J. Sandoval shares how the book of Proverbs speaks
in a recurring way about two different women.
One was the strange or foreign woman.
With explicit sexual language, young men are warned about the foreign
woman whose lips drip with the words of seduction. She will lead you to foreign gods, godless
idols, and destruction. The patriarch
also speaks of woman wisdom or the woman of worth. She is the ideal Jewish woman who can bring
home the bacon and fry it up in a pan. The
kind of woman described in Proverbs 31 reminds me of my favorite song by the
band Cake, “Short Skirt, Long Jacket.”
With fingernails that shine like justice
And a voice that is dark like tinted glass
She is fast, thorough, and sharp as a tack
She's touring the facilities and picking up slack
I want a girl with a short skirt and a long, long jacket[3]
And a voice that is dark like tinted glass
She is fast, thorough, and sharp as a tack
She's touring the facilities and picking up slack
I want a girl with a short skirt and a long, long jacket[3]
This is a woman of worth and virtue, not like
those strange and foreign woman who live outside of Israel. Right?
So, Proverbs seems to say, if you want life to go well for you, young
man, do not marry any of those foreign women.
Intentionally,
right after the book of Proverbs, is the book of Ruth. Naomi and her husband leave Israel in the
middle of a famine to the country of Moab.
There in Moab, their sons take foreign women, Moabite women, for their
wives. When Naomi’s husband and sons all
die, she decides to head back to Israel without any of the power necessary to
make it in a patriarchal culture—a man connected to you. She encourages her daughters-in-law to remain
in Moab. They are young enough to
remarry. But Ruth, Ruth, that foreign or
strange woman, acts more like woman wisdom, a woman of worth, and refuses to
leave the side of her mother-in-law in steadfast love. Ruth returns with Naomi back to Israel and
supports her and will not leave her side.
Ruth is sent by her mother-in-law to the bed of Boaz, a relative who
could redeem Naomi, by taking Ruth as his bride. There is no other way to say it. Ruth is sent by Naomi to seduce Naomi’s
relative, Boaz. The book of Ruth ends
with the strange and foreign woman giving birth to a son who will be an ancestor
to King David. Ruth is therefore
included in Matthew’s genealogy of Jesus.
Ok,
is the Bible a warning against strange or foreign women? Or is the Bible a critique of teaching
against those who warn against strange or foreign women? Yes.
The Bible is diverse. Throughout Scripture are these warnings
against foreign idolaters. Throughout
Scripture is the teaching that God cares about the salvation of those outside
the nation of Israel.
The
book of Jonah is one of those stories that flips the Jewish story. The Jewish story is that God calls the
prophet and the prophet responds by faithfully saying, however reluctantly,
“Here I am!” In this story, however,
Jonah is asked to go the mortal enemies of the Jewish people, the Ninevites, to
preach for their repentance. Jonah wants
nothing to do with this. He runs
away. The sea, thought to be outside
God’s control and love, is used by God to get Jonah back on track. The sea monster, thought to be a tool of
God’s judgment in story and song, became a creature of God’s mercy, swallowing
Jonah and then spitting him up on the beach on the way to Nineveh. Ok, is God an enemy of those who have
historically oppressed Israel? Or does
God seek to extend mercy to them?
Yes.
The
Bible is an ancient book filled with diverse and sometimes contradictory
teaching. Too often progressive
Christians have thrown the whole thing out because we cannot understand it like
our evangelical and fundamentalist sisters and brothers do. But within its pages, when engaged
critically, are mythologies, stories, songs, and teachings that can help us
discern how to move through this age.
The Bible is a tool. What I want to
encourage all of us to do, as we engage in those holiday conversations, is not
to get wrapped up in believing that, if you do not know Bible like someone else
does, it makes you any less of a Christian.
For, at our core, we are all spiritual beings. And there are many authentic paths. But if you do engage, you can easily say,
“You know, the Bible is a diverse book with diverse teachings, sometimes
contradictory in nature. I know you
think you have it down pat. But the fact
that you think the Bible only says one thing, means you really don’t know. While I, I think faith is living with that
ambiguity and diversity and discerning, as I grow, the wonderful words of life
found in its pages.” May it be so. Amen.
[1]
John Pavlovitz, “Conservative Christianity and White Supremacy’s Scary
Kinship,” Stuff That Needs to Be Said, February
7, 2017. https://johnpavlovitz.com/2017/02/07/the-scary-kinship-of-christian-nationalism-and-white-supremacy/.
[2]
Ibid.
No comments:
Post a Comment