Earth Day

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Reign of Christ Sunday, "It's the end of the world as we know it"


A Proper 28 33 BFC 2017
1 Thessalonians 5:1-11
November 26, 2017

          About five years ago, you may remember that there were a number of New-Agey spiritual folk who were worried about the Mayan calendar coming to an end signaling that the end of the world was upon us.  Present Mayan shamans universally came forward to say, “The end of the calendar does not mean that the world will come to an end.  It means that it will be transformed.” 
          Carlos Barrios. a historian, an anthropologist and investigator, after studying with traditional elders for 25 years since the age of 19, became a Mayan Ajq'ij, a ceremonial priest and spiritual guide, Eagle Clan.  Barrios said,

          Anthropologists visit the temple sites and read the inscriptions and make up stories about the Maya, but they do not read the signs correctly. It's just their imagination. Other people write about prophecy in the name of the Maya. They say that the world will end in December 2012. The Mayan elders are angry with this. The world will not end. It will be transformed.  "We are no longer in the World of the Fourth Sun, but we are not yet in the World of the Fifth Sun. This is the time in-between, the time of transition. As we pass through transition there is a colossal, global convergence of environmental destruction, social chaos, war, and ongoing Earth Changes.  He continues: "Humanity will continue, but in a different way. Material structures will change. From this we will have the opportunity to be more human. We are living in the most important era of the Mayan calendars and prophecies. All the prophecies of the world, all the traditions are converging now. There is no time for games. The spiritual ideal of this era is action.[1]

Likewise, Christian scholars have often been caught translating the mythic as otherworldly with no sense of a people, who pine--a God, who longs for justice. 
Christian missionary and theologian, Albert Schweitzer, charted the course for New Testament scholarship for many years by saying that the historical Jesus was largely irrelevant because he was apocalyptic, predicting that the world would come to an end.  Jesus was deluded.  The world did not come to an end.  Schweitzer believed that what Christians needed to follow was the Christ of faith, the teaching and ministry of Jesus developed, discerned, confessed, and described in the continuing work of the Christian Church, to continue with the basic spirit of Jesus and his reverence for life.
          Something was lost in that though.  The radical Jesus that Schweitzer taught and lived became lost in a relativized, homogenized, milque-white-toast Jesus.  I was in seminary as the Jesus Seminar became popular.  The long-awaited response to Schweitzer came as the Jesus Seminar said that not all things attributed to Jesus were Jesus.  In particular, Jesus did not predict the end of the world.  He was not apocalyptic.  He was more of a counter-cultural wisdom-giver.  Those apocalyptic predictions were done by gospel writers over and against the movement’s early enemies as things like the cataclysmic destruction of Jerusalem happened before their eyes.  The scale of destruction—with perhaps millions of Jews killed, with Judea and Galilee laid to waste, and with Jewish communities throughout the Mediterranean attacked must have felt like the end of the world to many Jewish people.[2]
          But then came a rejoinder to what I learned in seminary.  Something grittier and more true to who Jesus was as a Jew.  Other Biblical scholars said, “Wait a minute!  Paul is even more apocalyptic than Jesus.  And all of the Jewish prophets were apocalyptic, but apocalyptic is not God’s truth-teller saying that the end of the world is afoot.  Apocalyptic is akin to the Mayan understanding that means not the end of the world but the end of the world as we know it.  In particular, within Jewish apocalyptic thought, was the great and terrible Day of the Living God as shared in Paul’s letter to the churches in Thessaloniki.  Knowing that a new world would never come without the imploding of the old in violence, warfare, and destruction, Jewish prophets used the Day of the Living God to tell people who gained nothing from imperial power that God was at work, empire was not sustainable, and that what the world was experiencing in the present moment are the labor pains of something new waiting to be born. 
          For Jewish prophets, Jesus, and Paul, talking the end of the world was not about some otherworldly promise.  Here is a Biblical story that should be informative for us.  Paul writes that the official, imperial message shall be, “I will bring you peace and security.”  Know then, Paul writes, know that they are espousing a gospel of destruction.  Throughout Paul’s letter he has been using Roman imperial language in the alternative to say there is something broader and wider than the worship of the Roman Caesar.  Paul uses words we have translated as epiphany and Second Coming which were actually words for the manifestation or arrival of the emperor into a village or a city.  Thessaloniki was thoroughly Roman, a temple built with the inscription to Caesar Augustus, the son of god.  Coinage was minted and transacted in Thessaloniki which proclaimed Julius Caesar god on one side, and on the other side an imprint of his adopted son, Octavian or Augustus.  Lord and Savior were titles used by all the emperors to declare what they coveted most from their populace—loyalty.[3] 
          Loyalty, loyalty.  That term used by the apostle Paul for what has become traditionally translated as faith.[4]  Do we have faith in or give our loyalty and allegiance to whom Jupiter has appointed king and lord and ascending to god in Julius Caesar and the dynasty that followed him?  Or do we give our loyalty and allegiance to Jesus the Christ, Mediterranean Jewish peasant and prophet? 
          Loyalty oaths were common things demanded of the subjected populace by Caesars and their protectors and those who crossed them were hunted down and killed to remind the populace that purity demanded allegiance to one Lord and King and one alone..  Only 13 years before 1 Thessalonians was written, this was the loyalty oath spoken by the people of Aritium in support of the new emperor, Caligiula:

On my conscience, I shall be an enemy of those persons whom I know to be enemies of Gaius Caesar Germanicus, and if anyone imperils or shall imperil him or his safety by arms or by civil war I shall not cease to hunt him down by land and by sea, until he pays the penalty to Caesar in full.  I shall not hold myself or my children dearer than his safety and I shall consider as my enemies those persons who are hostile to him.  If consciously I swear falsely or am proved false may Jupiter Optimus Maximus and the deified Augustus and all the other immortal gods punish me and my children with loss of country, safety, and all my fortune.[5]  

Loss of country, safety, and fortune is a steep price for lack of loyalty.  And if others should show lack of allegiance imperial Caesar, it is my sacred obligation, as a citizen and/or subject of Rome to hunt these non-loyalists down.
          Modern-day Christians are often critical of the language Paul uses.  It’s too “us” and “them”, too “black” and “white”, too polarizing.  Sometimes I wonder if we don’t use that language because our neutrality allows us to maintain Caesar’s easy peace—where wars are fought without reason, troops are killed in places where we didn’t even know we were at war, and every knee shall bow in allegiance to one idol.  W1e may regale the present Caesar in office, but the longest running war in U.S. history, ravaging God’s good earth, violence against people of color, a patriarchy that only demeans and devalues anything other than one solid gender and sexuality, and demonization of the poor and immigrant have been going on long before this person and party. 
          And the apostle Paul makes it clear that this is not just about Caesar.  It’s about a system, a way of continuing to suck on the exhaust pipe of a ’57 Chevy, where we are all lured to inebriation and the imperial dream.  Whispered softly to us day after day is a voice saying, “It’s easier, just drift off.  Stay drunk. Shhhhhhh.   I know you’re anxious.  I know you’re afraid, baby.  Sleep.  Sleep.  There are always tradeoffs.  It will all be ok.  Just trust me and I’ll give you all the peace and security you need.” 
          Paul responds to a cultural drunkenness and dream by counseling vigilance, “Stay awake.  Stay sober.”  So that you may greet the Day of the Living God with joy.  Stay awake.  Stay sober.  So that you may not fear the necessary transformation that is taking place.  Stay vigilant. 
          The great American prophet William Stringfellow preached at the ordination of 71 year-old Anne Garrison back in 1981.  At that ordination he told the gathered congregation that they were ordaining Anne for being a religious person, as if she had achieved perfect attendance at Sunday School for all these years.  Instead, Stringfellow believed, she was being ordained, as all Christians are, to a life of vigilance.  Her ordination was an opening to future vigilance, not a reward for a virtuous past.  Vigilance is our dew line, our early warning system, our watchtower, our way of moving to the watch tower to greet the day when dawn does not even seem possible in the night.  Vigilance is that rapt attention that actively beckons, plans for, and awaits the new day.  Some have their whole lives destroyed when the transformation comes.  Others have been planning for it, making room for it in their hearts and homes, and painfully participating it over and against the wider culture.  The Spirit of God praying in us and through us provides an inner vigilance of Spirit--the Spirit of watchfulness and discernment.”[6] 
          Those children of the light also know when invitations to the night come.  They sometimes make huge sacrifices to not be swept away in the bright, shiny, new and improved invitations to make hate and cruelty fashionable and enlist in its ranks. 

Franz Jägerstätter, Austrian peasant and conscientious objector, was beheaded by the National Security State known as the 3rd Reich on August 9, 1943, for refusing induction into the German army. While in prison, his chaplains, military officers and attorneys tried to persuade him against his conscience to accept induction.  He could not be swayed, and "described a dream he had had in 1938 in which crowds of people were struggling to board a shiny new train. At some point he heard a voice announce, ' This train is bound for hell.' It occurred to him afterward that this train was a symbol of the Nazi movement.  Surely, he concluded, one should not board such a train; surely, having discovered its destination, one ought to jump off such a train before it reach its goal, even though it might cost one's life."[7] His dream speaks to us now:

Jump . . .  Off . . .  This . . . Train.   We too, are called by Paul, to be the children of light, the children of the new Day that is dawning, and patron saints of conscientious objectors to the neo-fascism that has been bending knees and swearing allegiance to the night stallions of war and military mayhem.    "You are all children of light and children of the day; we are not of the night. . . for those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who are drunk get drunk at night."  The nation is drunk. 
Paul’s prescription is that of an "Intervention" by people who know their loyalty and allegiance outside of what is pounded into us, whispered into our ear, day after day.  These children of the light are vigilant about extricating themselves from the anxiety and fear, the stupor created by war.  The Church is called to be an Intervention Team to put a final NO to the world's drunken binge of self-destruction, and a joyous YES to embracing the sobriety of solidarity with the poor, who are the future of humankind, in a non-violent, non-consumptive world.[8]   Children of light, jump off the train, join hands, so that we may forever encourage each other in staying awake and staying sober.  On this Sunday, the Christian Church is to proclaim, not Caesar but Christ.   And Christ, Christ said not the Roman Empire but God’s Empire.  And Christ did not point to himself, but said the Empire of God is like a weed, like a shepherd, like a woman, like a wedding banquet.    Jump off the train.  The banquet awaits.  Amen. 


[2] James Carroll, Christ Actually:  The Son of God for the Secular Age (New York:  Viking, 2014), p. 46.
[3] J. R. Harrison, “Paul and the imperial gospel at Thessaloniki,” Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 25 no. 1 Sept. 2002, pp. 78ff.
[4] The word pistis (pistis) means loyalty or allegiance to sovereign or dynastic rule.  Matthew W. Bates, Salvation by Allegiance Alone:  Rethinking Faith, Works, and the Gospel of Jesus the King (Grand Rapids, MI:  Baker Academic, 2017), p. 79. 
[5] Harrison, “Paul and the imperial,” p. 80, Quoting CIL II172
[6] Grant Gallup, “November 13, 2005,” Homily Grits, http://rci.rutgers.edu/~lcrew/homilygrits04_05/msg00077.html. 
[7] Ibid, quoting "Franz Jägerstätter, Conscientious Objector, Martyr (1907-1943", in All Saints: Daily Reflections on Saints, Prophets, and Witnesses for Our Time.  Robert Ellsberg. New York: Crossroad Publishing Co.1997
[8] Ibid.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Sermon, Proper 6, "Roman law and order co-opts what it means to be faithful"

  I want to make it clear I would never preach this sermon.  One of my cardinal rules for sermon-giving is that I should never appear as her...